Why are fixed clasp bracelets so popular

Posts
457
Likes
151
Recently I tried different bracelets on some vintage Seiko watches and my personal conclusion is that chain/mesh(also called Milanese) is very comfy and much handier than a fixed length clasp bracelet.

I also like the 70/80s sliding clasps, still massive but adjustable.

My daily abuse diver is on a fixed one and in hot weather, it's a really tight fit while if it's cold it gets loose. Tbh the people at my local Seiko service center told me it's normal. So sometimes I adjust the clasp position myself but it's annoying and a tool is needed, so I can't do it on the fly.

As for leather straps, they do look nice, but go bad after a while and collect sweat, so I am starting to wonder if I should go full sliding/milanese. The other reason is I don't want to scratch the medallions on KS/GS, but this can be remedied with a replacement transparent caseback.

That being said, one needs a few leather ones for those genuine overpriced Seiko buckles(KS/GS) 😁
 
Posts
2,502
Likes
3,515
I never thought they were "that popular", But that may or may not just be me.
 
Posts
767
Likes
2,171
There is another factor at play and that is the weight of the watch. If the watch is lightweight, you can get away with wearing it a bit looser on the wrist without it slipping. A heavy watch and especially a heavy bracelet is more problematic because you will have to wear it tighter to keep it from slipping. For example, my IWC MK12 has a heavy bracelet and a pretty heavy head compared to say a datejust with a plexi crystal and a bracelet with hollow links.

I wish someone would invent a link for the 78360 etc Rolex oyster bracelet that is spring loaded, would come in handy on the bigger sports watches.
Edited: