Dan S
·Well, this one has a late clasp (@Dan S, could you share what year of production the clasp is? Should say on the inside part), but the bracelet + endlinks aren't correct - unless Certina started using a different supplier at some point.
It's a very cool watch, @Dan S 👍
Looks like it has had its luminous material removed at some point, which is exceedingly common on these. On the 3-6-9-12 markers there should be a raised lume inlay, which is very often either missing or replaced. My theory is that the heavy application was very fragile (perhaps more sensitive to moisture?) and therefore was removed/replaced entirely during services.
It's a "T" dial which is a bit less common than those without the T (my observations only), but what this T stands for no-one seems to know. A few times I've seen the model for sale as "DS T". If you could share your serial number (if still visible), it would be great 😀
Actually, I may have posted prematurely on this one ... got a little carried away. The watch is not running well and I'm not certain I am going to keep it.
Anyway, you are right on the money with your observations. Even without your knowledge of clasps and bracelets, I can tell that the bracelet is not original; the endlinks are not quite right. I noticed that once I had the watch in hand. I can't find a year of production, but the inside of the clasp is marked GEMEX. With UV excitation, I can see minute traces of lume inside the inner recesses of the raised markers, but it has definitely been deliberately removed. I think there were also dots marking each hour at some point, but most gone now. A shame, really. The serial looks to be 5,125,xxx.








