Which Vintage Submariner?

Posts
295
Likes
759
I have been looking and researching, and beginning to think that my best bet might be a non-matte dial 16800, with some patina. I think there is more choice out there, at a level within my budget, and unmolested, with full set.
I have seen a few others that I would value an opinion on - and will try and post some pictures later.

i personally would hold out for a matte 16800 if your budget is 4-5k GBP. you can find one; even if you need to stretch a bit, it will be worth it in the long run. they are true transitionals. they were only made for a few years, many had matte dials replaced with WG surround dials during service, etc etc. it is a much better place to put your money than a later 16800, imo. take your time, they arent going to increase in value 50% overnight.
 
Posts
107
Likes
92
I keep being drawn back to this one.
Its a 168000. No box or papers.
The colour looks interesting.
The price is OK - a bit high I think - something like £4,600, but maybe theres some movement.
I am concerned that the colour may have been added artificially (would someone do that?)
Also, there is some small corrosion on the second hand. And some stains on some lumes.
The seller says it probably did have some water inside it, but the case is apparently clean.
Also, on the dial there are these small dots.
What do you think - should I move on and hold out - or is it an exciting watch worth pursuing? View attachment 423129 View attachment 423133
Edited:
 
Posts
107
Likes
92
i personally would hold out for a matte 16800 if your budget is 4-5k GBP. you can find one; even if you need to stretch a bit, it will be worth it in the long run. they are true transitionals. they were only made for a few years, many had matte dials replaced with WG surround dials during service, etc etc. it is a much better place to put your money than a later 16800, imo. take your time, they arent going to increase in value 50% overnight.
The 16800 matte is the watch I first picked out as what I would like, but they just don't seem to come up with the full set, matching hands, pearl and lume, polished sympathetically at a reasonable price. I did see one (over my real budget - but like you say, I would stretch a bit if the perfect watch appeared), but then found out the case had been replaced.
If you really think one thats right will come along, then I will hold on, after all, its not like I need one right now (but I feel like I do!!)
I think your advice is spot on, but its tempting when you see others, and I was shown some pictures the other day of a non-matte 16800, but with nice colour, full set, all original etc - and if the price is right, its really tempting.
 
Posts
295
Likes
759
The 16800 matte is the watch I first picked out as what I would like, but they just don't seem to come up with the full set, matching hands, pearl and lume, polished sympathetically at a reasonable price. I did see one (over my real budget - but like you say, I would stretch a bit if the perfect watch appeared), but then found out the case had been replaced.
If you really think one thats right will come along, then I will hold on, after all, its not like I need one right now (but I feel like I do!!)
I think your advice is spot on, but its tempting when you see others, and I was shown some pictures the other day of a non-matte 16800, but with nice colour, full set, all original etc - and if the price is right, its really tempting.

i think if a full set is a must-have, then, yes, you prob are not going to get one in your price range. the corrosion on the hands is extremely common for these references. it is much less noticeable in person. i wouldnt let that stop you from buying a nicely patina'd watch at a nice price. but they are out there. here is one that sold 2 weeks ago. it sold almost immediately but it was a steal at this price.

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/rolex-submariner-16800-1984-matte-dial-4487031.html
 
Posts
107
Likes
92
This isn't a bad price for a 168000. Any more pics? What's the state of the bracelet?

These are rare and unusual references and clean up nicely. Not quite vintage but certainly modern classics. I'm enjoying mine...
 
Posts
1,368
Likes
835
i think if a full set is a must-have, then, yes, you prob are not going to get one in your price range. the corrosion on the hands is extremely common for these references. it is much less noticeable in person. i wouldnt let that stop you from buying a nicely patina'd watch at a nice price. but they are out there. here is one that sold 2 weeks ago. it sold almost immediately but it was a steal at this price.

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/rolex-submariner-16800-1984-matte-dial-4487031.html

wow obo too! that went quick
 
Posts
344
Likes
434
It's a reasonable example but I think the asking price is a little strong...

Re-luming with degraded tritium is pretty common. I'm not expert enough to say if that's happened here.

The dial "dots" are curious. I'd guess it's the laquer degrading, along with the tritium.

The sapphire edge looks chipped but to be expected and not expensive to fix.

The bezel insert looks chipped under the lume pip. You'll either love the character or want to get it fixed.

Any pics of the "168000" between the lugs? You want to make sure that extra zero doesn't look funky.

Is the watch close enough to go see in person?
 
Posts
344
Likes
434
Also, how can you tell if a watch has been re-cased?
There is a serial number on the case AND on the movement.

Only Rolex have the records to know which case originally shipped with which movement.
 
Posts
344
Likes
434
There is a serial number on the case AND on the movement.

Only Rolex have the records to know which case originally shipped with which movement.

And come to thing about it, I recall reading about something called a "Service Case" which has a special serial number prefix (I want to say an "S"?). If your case is truly, horribly mangled, a Rolex service center can re-case the movement.
 
Posts
107
Likes
92
Thanks morningtundra,
I think the case is fine, and I did look, and it is engraved 168000.
I haven't looked inside, but if I get serious on it, they will show me.
I am just concerned about the colour not being genuine.
 
Posts
295
Likes
759
A Rolex service case serial begins with "44" (I have also heard "47" cases are service as well). If the serial begins with "44," run from the watch. Regarding the lume, Im not a expert on WG dials. Id post a dial close-up on VRF and/or TRF though before you get serious about the watch.

If the 16800 matte is out of the running and you are set on the 168000, might I be able to persaude you to consider a 16700? Also a transitional watch. the last GMT Master. tritium dial (though they also came in luminova later in the run) means patina, sapphire crystal and they sell at a slight discount to the 16710. I think they are undervalued and make a great daily wearer. They were made for a relatively short time. They were sold alongside the 710 but didnt sell nearly as well bc they dont have a independent GMT hand, so were made in much much fewer numbers even though they were produced until 1999. They only came with a pepsi bezel from the factory but you can swap the pepsi for a black GMT bezel easily if you want a Sub look.
 
Posts
344
Likes
434
A Rolex service case serial begins with "44" (I have also heard "47" cases are service as well). If the serial begins with "44," run from the watch. Regarding the lume, Im not a expert on WG dials. Id post a dial close-up on VRF and/or TRF though before you get serious about the watch.

If the 16800 matte is out of the running and you are set on the 168000, might I be able to persaude you to consider a 16700? Also a transitional watch. the last GMT Master. tritium dial (though they also came in luminova later in the run) means patina, sapphire crystal and they sell at a slight discount to the 16710. I think they are undervalued and make a great daily wearer. They were made for a relatively short time. They were sold alongside the 710 but didnt sell nearly as well bc they dont have a independent GMT hand, so were made in much much fewer numbers even though they were produced until 1999. They only came with a pepsi bezel from the factory but you can swap the pepsi for a black GMT bezel easily if you want a Sub look.
I agree this is also a seriously nice watch changing hands for reasonable money.
 
Posts
107
Likes
92
Thanks - but too many options, and having started down the Sub path, I must stick to that or I will get more confused than I am already!!
Also, I have enjoyed the research, and now need to see it through.

Given I have a 1971 moon watch, and the sub will be my next, maybe a 16700, will join the list once I have raised enough funds to start looking again.

The 16800 Matte is not out of the running, I just dont think I will feel find one I feel happy with. Price wise they seem to be well over £5,000, and thats without a box or papers. But if one turned up that I liked, even a bit over budget, I would jump at it.

So the 16800 non matte seems a lot easier to find, and I am more likely to find a really good example full set at a fair price.
And thats why the 168000 seems interesting to me, because it looks the same as the 16800, but rarer - and I have seen one with a full set, but its overseas, and I am not sure I can face the hassle.

A dealer has a nice 16800 coming in, in September. Full set, pictures look nice, good patina, and unmolested (apparently), so I may just wait and get that if its right.

And just to throw a spanner in the works, I saw this yesterday, which the dealer said was a 2000 watch, but to me looks like it might be a 5513 L series as the glass was plexiglass, but I am not happy with the hands, and the price was £6000.View attachment 424131 View attachment 424131
 
Posts
598
Likes
5,472
Thanks - but too many options, and having started down the Sub path, I must stick to that or I will get more confused than I am already!!
Also, I have enjoyed the research, and now need to see it through.

Given I have a 1971 moon watch, and the sub will be my next, maybe a 16700, will join the list once I have raised enough funds to start looking again.

The 16800 Matte is not out of the running, I just dont think I will feel find one I feel happy with. Price wise they seem to be well over £5,000, and thats without a box or papers. But if one turned up that I liked, even a bit over budget, I would jump at it.

So the 16800 non matte seems a lot easier to find, and I am more likely to find a really good example full set at a fair price.
And thats why the 168000 seems interesting to me, because it looks the same as the 16800, but rarer - and I have seen one with a full set, but its overseas, and I am not sure I can face the hassle.

A dealer has a nice 16800 coming in, in September. Full set, pictures look nice, good patina, and unmolested (apparently), so I may just wait and get that if its right.

And just to throw a spanner in the works, I saw this yesterday, which the dealer said was a 2000 watch, but to me looks like it might be a 5513 L series as the glass was plexiglass, but I am not happy with the hands, and the price was £6000.View attachment 424131 View attachment 424131

@Gbp 6000 ($7800) for that 5513, I think its fair to say the seller very hopeful.
Reading through this thread, there are many who have given you some really good insights and advice. Take your time to decide which variant it is you really want and then focus your attention on sourcing the one that has all of the attributes that appeal most to you.

The 16800 is a great watch. For a while they were very reasonable priced. It seems that is changing fast. A quick look around TRF at the few on offer and you will find a fullset gloss dial from 1984 being offered at $7495 and a someone thinks they have a matte dial full set that they can get $12500 for. HQ Milton (Jacek) has two currently (neither with B&P) at around the $9000 mark.

Just to give you an idea on how the prices are moving, I could not give this "all original" away for more than $6300, late last year.




Over the weekend I was discussing this one, with a watch buddy, posted on Instagram by Analogshift, It's specs and year comparable to the one above. My understanding was that the asking was around $8000, watch only.



While I understand your desire to own a nice Submariner there were a few subtle hints at a GMT as an option. While they are going up in price rapidly too, they do give you the option of 2 legitimate bracelets and three different insert options.

Whichever way you decided to go, take your time and enhjoy the hunt. Theres a lot of learning and fun to be had along the way!
 
Posts
107
Likes
92
Thanks for the thoughts - shame I wasn't in the market late last year!! Your one looks exactly like the kind of watch I would like to own.
I think I will be going with a 16800 Gloss full set (or maybe a 168000), as both feel a bit more realistic in price.
I have also seen an early 2 line full set 14060, which is also tempting.
I think the GMT is going to have to sit on the back bench for now, its not really what I was after.
Funnily enough - the look of the one you posted from Marshalls looks nice too - but a bit too steep on the price. Do you think its a good one?