I also couldn't wrap my head why to do this to an almost new watch, so I came up with a possible scenario:
- Since the crystal was changed to the not original one, while originally this model also had hesalit, it probably means that it was not done to change appearance (because it wouldn't change a look that much) but because of the need (the previous glass was broken).
- Going further, if the glass was broken and it was replaced to not the original one, it means that the fix was done with as low budget as possible. So the whole thing probably was not initiated as a passion project, but because of broken parts in the watch.
- I think it makes sense to assume that it was some kind of blow to the front of the watch. In the effect of which, glass, bezel and hands were broken. It's possible that maybe this brushing of the step of the dial was also in the small part an effect of the accident, but to "fix" the appearance it was brushed entirely by hand.
- I wouldn't be surprised if the blow was more to the 3 o'clock side, as small hand there is replaced and that maybe hour and minute hand were also on this side and that's why they had to be replaced and chrono second hand was only stripped of paint.
- Another thing is dark lume plots, my guess here is that the lume was partially removed and what was left was made dirty by black pigment from the dial (from brushing the step). It's visible that somebody was touching the minute track while doing this as painted minute markers are also faded.
I just can't accept the idea that somebody did this deliberately and while doing mod/fix he took the cheapest (almost random) elements that he could find. In my opinion, it was more about using the lowest amount of money to make that usable (and in some way acceptable visually - like brushing manually the whole "step" around, instead of leaving part of it brushed) so he can sell it, instead of paying extra money to get it fixed properly.