What omega is this

Posts
4
Likes
0
My dad gave me this omega watch before he passed. It looks like a mash up between a de Ville, and a constellation someone please help . Thanks you for time and consideration
Ps the band isn't from the original Watch but it is omega
 
Posts
1,873
Likes
2,543
Hi and sorry for your loss!

This watch is likely to be a reference 166.0209 powered by a 1020 mechanical movement from the first half of the 1970ies

Seems to be worn intensively considering the case condition.

If you search for the reference number online you will get more information.

All the best!
 
Posts
4
Likes
0
Hi and sorry for your loss!

This watch is likely to be a reference 166.0209 powered by a 1020 mechanical movement from the first half of the 1970ies

Seems to be worn intensively considering the case condition.

If you search for the reference number online you will get more information.

All the best!
Thank you so much!! For the info and your time . I searched with the reference number you gave me and it looks pretty similar . However, the only issue I see is that the face of my watch is in cursive and says "de ville" . I don't see that in any other watch . Is it fake ?
 
Posts
1,873
Likes
2,543
Well....

I'm not very familiar with the reference and 70s Omegas at all

My initial thoughts about the 'De Ville' wirting were the same: that looks pretty strange.

After some reserach I found at least one similar dial design:



https://www.showcasecouriers.com/pr...e-day-date-166-0209-steel-gold-1972-automatic

What I also found was a confusing number of dial variations for the this reference number, so "who knows?"

70ies dress watches are not very in demand so making fake dials for those watches seems pretty useless

What is wrong with your watch are the hands, they are not original to your watch.

Hope that helps!
 
Posts
251
Likes
268
I have a similar question, though looking at all the photos, I find it to be incredibly inconsistent. I saw quite a few "Seamaster", "Seamaster Automatic" and "Seamaster Deville". I suspect that over the years they changed the inscription on the dial quite a few times. These dress watches aren't 'valuable' or popular enough seemingly for anyone to have done the effort to catalog them all.

Apparently it was ~1967 (https://www.swisswatchexpo.com/thewatchclub/2017/05/07/the-history-of-the-omega-de-ville/) And (https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/chronicle/1967-the-de-ville-is-born) that "De ville" as a label was split off of "Seamaster" and would have been around on its own.

So in general: Particularly based on the consistant inconsistency online with these, and the one that Passover found, I don't have a reason to believe that it is a fake/repaint/etc.

It seems like a gorgeous watch that your dad cared for enough to give to you, so it is one you should wear proudly! Get a good sympathetic service (meaning, one where history is preserved when possible), and wear it and think of your dad.
 
Posts
4
Likes
0
Well....

I'm not very familiar with the reference and 70s Omegas at all

My initial thoughts about the 'De Ville' wirting were the same: that looks pretty strange.

After some reserach I found at least one similar dial design:



https://www.showcasecouriers.com/pr...e-day-date-166-0209-steel-gold-1972-automatic

What I also found was a confusing number of dial variations for the this reference number, so "who knows?"

70ies dress watches are not very in demand so making fake dials for those watches seems pretty useless

What is wrong with your watch are the hands, they are not original to your watch.

Hope that helps!
Thank you so much . This helps we quite a lot
 
Posts
4
Likes
0
I have a similar question, though looking at all the photos, I find it to be incredibly inconsistent. I saw quite a few "Seamaster", "Seamaster Automatic" and "Seamaster Deville". I suspect that over the years they changed the inscription on the dial quite a few times. These dress watches aren't 'valuable' or popular enough seemingly for anyone to have done the effort to catalog them all.

Apparently it was ~1967 (https://www.swisswatchexpo.com/thewatchclub/2017/05/07/the-history-of-the-omega-de-ville/) And (https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/chronicle/1967-the-de-ville-is-born) that "De ville" as a label was split off of "Seamaster" and would have been around on its own.

So in general: Particularly based on the consistant inconsistency online with these, and the one that Passover found, I don't have a reason to believe that it is a fake/repaint/etc.

It seems like a gorgeous watch that your dad cared for enough to give to you, so it is one you should wear proudly! Get a good sympathetic service (meaning, one where history is preserved when possible), and wear it and think of your dad.
Thank you so much for your kind words and your time. I wear it only on special occasion and take great care of it . I intend on passing on to my kid ☺️