- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 5
What do you think of this Omega Seamaster 300 Big Triangle?
- Posts
- 3,742
- Likes
- 6,362
hoipolloi
·Looks ok to me.
- Posts
- 762
- Likes
- 809
masteroftime
·Looks correct and the bezel is rather nice. The big question is whether you like the dial/hands. These come in so many shades of patina, aged, and water damaged. There are plenty with some type of dial wear and relatively few that are crisp and all original. Likewise, price plays a big role. Before buying any sm300, just make sure you like it.
- Posts
- 1,553
- Likes
- 1,976
Fatcat
·Not the worse one, complete and legit go for it
- Posts
- 13,211
- Likes
- 22,975
Davidt
·Overall it looks correct and in decent shape, but the lume colour would put me off.
- Posts
- 311
- Likes
- 185
lucian23
·I think the price also will be very important in the decsion to buy this model. From what i remeber i seen this model on some local website and the seller ask for a few (several) K 😀
- Posts
- 290
- Likes
- 210
Knudsen1971
·Looking all original, black date window, I would expect manufactured in 1969 earliest, serial number 27mil.+
- Posts
- 2,953
- Likes
- 6,132
Fallout Boy
·Dial needs a check with UVlight. Hour hand (at least) is imo relumed.Tritium should be olive-green .I can not see, if the case is polished.....(sides)
- Posts
- 290
- Likes
- 210
Knudsen1971
·In my honest oppinion it is not relumed at all. I have seen many ways how tritium filled paint ages. As tritiumm is powder added to a paint (lacqer) and can age in many ways depending on the conditions (sun, damp,used lubricants etc). And even it was relumed, was done in the past with tritium, UV wont help in decision I think.
- Posts
- 2,953
- Likes
- 6,132
Fallout Boy
·@Knudsen 1971 My SM 300 BT
yours?
yours?
- Posts
- 290
- Likes
- 210
Knudsen1971
·You want to see my BT, or all? 😀 OK, lets start with NOV66 BT
Your watch is interresting, as I have never seen BT dial with batton hands, but aged evenly, what is your SN please?
Your watch is interresting, as I have never seen BT dial with batton hands, but aged evenly, what is your SN please?
- Posts
- 2,953
- Likes
- 6,132
Fallout Boy
·looks like new 😀 dial and bezel!
27.116.xxx 1968
(the idexes and hands of my SM are olive 😉 )
27.116.xxx 1968
(the idexes and hands of my SM are olive 😉 )
- Posts
- 290
- Likes
- 210
Knudsen1971
·SN 27116xxx is a NOV1969 btw...so the hands does not match? Do you have EoA for it?
- Posts
- 2,953
- Likes
- 6,132
Fallout Boy
·Hands OK, I found several other versions over years.
- Posts
- 290
- Likes
- 210
Knudsen1971
·Ahh, thanx, it is US cal550, that make a sense then.
The hands it`s a bit mystrery, as last seen batton hands on 165.024 I know about is from NOV 66. An unicorn you have there! And my guess is, thah you have Naiad crown on it 😀
The hands it`s a bit mystrery, as last seen batton hands on 165.024 I know about is from NOV 66. An unicorn you have there! And my guess is, thah you have Naiad crown on it 😀
Edited:
- Posts
- 8,514
- Likes
- 60,869
TexOmega
·Ahh, thanx, it is US cal550, that make a sense then.
The hands it`s a bit mystrery, as last seen batton hands on 165.024 I know about is from NOV 66. An unicorn you have there! And my guess is, thah you have Naiad crown on it 😀
Now you've seen one more, Naiad crown, too
Jan 1967 cal 550 Ref 165024 (no dot)
