There is no reason to have it swapped into a tre tacche, because of that nice coin edge case and the overall condition. Provided that this actual
case and the dial are original belonging to each other. Is there an indicator if this is so?
Just to keep this bumped
Just sold at a local UK auction house for £2800 + fees.
movement numbered 5860946, case numbered 20644 174
I was the underbidder, didnt have the funds to keep going. I think we might see this dial on a Tre-Tacche some time soon.
that’s 3584 GBP if you assume about 28% in overall fees. That’s 3972 euros at today’s rate- 4472 dollars.
I strongly believe this one is a redial though I’m not an expert. There are certain inconsistencies on this one.
You should know this is 29-30mm dial...Too large!...The Tretacche needs a 27-28mm dial.
Not too large for a 33mm tre tacche, as shown in the first posts of this thread.
Reviving this thread to get some thoughts on this example I'm considering for purchase. Case and 12.68z movement serials match. Extract dates to 1935 in Italy and lists ref 2326 which is consistent with this style case, as far as I know. My hesitation is with the dial - the text and print configuration. It's a close match to the dial earlier on in this thread but the subdial, minute track, and text are not. I also searched the ads and catalogs I have and have come close but no match yet. I'd really appreciate some feedback from the more experienced here. The applied sector dial is a grail for me, but don't want to make a foolish mistake.
On the first view the "Longines" looks different from others, not correct in my eyes, also the subdial print.
Not an applied sector dial, but probably soon coming to a tre tacche near you— as @Radiumpassion once said so aptly.
