No, they are not all built this way. A traditional sub seconds movements doesn't have a center seconds wheel at all.
This allows Rolex to use this movement for other watches with central seconds, so saves them having to develop both styles of movements.
Exactly. It’s not the thickness that’s necessarily a problem but they gotta introduce some lines somehow and break up that hockey puck looking case. I almost think they do it intentionally to force us to move onto Rolex.
M Matty1How does this compare to the omega sub seconds in the AT?
Personally, I think the thickness itself is also a problem. If lower-tier brands can make GMTs that come in under 14mm (or even 13mm), what are Tudor and Omega doing? It's clearly not limited to brands like Rolex, so why is Omega behind the curve?
If the Longines Zulu leaks are true, the fact that they can make a 39mm, 13.5mm thick true GMT should be embarassing to Omega. They're getting shown up by a cheaper Swatch Group brand. Here's hoping OmegaSteel allows them to get a co-axial GMT movement into a 42mm Seamaster this year.
I do wonder if they'll have anything to respond to the fact that the Rolex group appears to be positioning Tudor as the primary competitor to Omega with the aim of certifying all of its watches to the METAS standard. A lot of people are going to see that parity as Omega being closer to Tudor than Rolex.
Evidently, neither of them can make a sporty GMT that's less than 14mm thick. So they have that in common. I guess to get something like that, you gotta get to the tippy top echelon. Like Longines. Or Certina.
Hi
Surely this height is related to how waterproof the watch is? It’s like trying to compare a 200hp engine to a 300hp version.
FWIW, I think the new Ingeniuer design from IWC is a serious contender for best new watch so far in 2023. I’m partial to the black dial. Fantastic looking watch. Keeping to the Genta roots but also clearly distinct. Also: 120-hour power reserve.
Wonder if it’s going to be impossible to get like a Royal Oak or Nautilus…
Hi
Surely this height is related to how waterproof the watch is? It’s like trying to compare a 200hp engine to a 300hp version.
No, they are not all built this way. A traditional sub seconds movements doesn't have a center seconds wheel at all.
This allows Rolex to use this movement for other watches with central seconds, so saves them having to develop both styles of movements.
Same idea - both for the sub-seconds AT, and the Seamaster 1948.
The main difference is that these are based off already existing movements (89800 and 8800 respectively) where this is a new Rolex movement. It's odd that they would pick a sub-seconds watch to debut this in.
The giant straight /slab sides... hideous