Watchco Seamaster 300 depth rating?

Posts
208
Likes
80
Was the 1960s Seamaster 300 only rated to 200m? If so, why was it called the "300?"

Has anyone pressure tested the 165.024 or the Watchco 166.0324 at 300m?
 
Posts
11,959
Likes
20,788
Isn’t it because testing equipment at the time could only test to 200m but Omega were confident it could go deeper?

that might just be internet hearsay though
 
Posts
6,523
Likes
26,480
@Archer , do you by chance have any test results and/or insight on pressure test capabilities?
 
Posts
1,189
Likes
2,231
I think Archer tested my SM300 build to 300m. Or I asked him to and he did what was right, set me straight, and tested to what was appropriate for the watch. It was so long ago and really basic 100m resistance is all you need for pretty much everything you can humanly do with a watch.
 
Posts
255
Likes
185
Found two sources of info, hence both a bit different:
https://www.gearpatrol.com/watches/a40082973/omega-seamaster/
https://www.omegaseamaster300.com/
What is for sure is, that the Seamaster 300 was just a model name.
I wonder if it could pass the test with the naiad system crown, as the screw down crown was added later to fulfill the MoD requirements.
I have 2 watchco builds, one Naiad and one screw down crown, but both were tested just to 100m.
But me thinks the sdc version would pass the 300m wr test without any problem.
https://www.gearpatrol.com/watches/a40082973/omega-seamaster/
 
Posts
208
Likes
80
Here's what's interesting about the "300" being just a model name theory: The Seamaster 120 was rated to 120 meters per the vintage ads!

The Seamaster 300 as pictured with the earlier Niad crown was rated a 200 meters. So why didn't Omega call the 300 instead the Seamaster 200?

Does anyone know when the screw down crown was first fitted on the 300? Was it during the production run? Or was it a service bulletin update that occurred after the watch was discontinued? Has anyone tried pressure testing the Niad and SCD at 300 meters?

 
Posts
1,189
Likes
2,231
Was there a contemporary competitor with a "xxxxx 200"?
 
Posts
2,527
Likes
3,391
Found two sources of info, hence both a bit different:
https://www.gearpatrol.com/watches/a40082973/omega-seamaster/
https://www.omegaseamaster300.com/
What is for sure is, that the Seamaster 300 was just a model name.
I wonder if it could pass the test with the naiad system crown, as the screw down crown was added later to fulfill the MoD requirements.
I have 2 watchco builds, one Naiad and one screw down crown, but both were tested just to 100m.
But me thinks the sdc version would pass the 300m wr test without any problem.

From my understanding, the problem with the naid crown was not at high pressures, but at lower pressures near the surface. It worked assuming an external pressure pushing it in to make a tight seal. That worked fine at the 200m pressure test, but often failed when swimming!

hence the switch to a screw down. It was production, I think introduced in 1967 or 1968. My 1966 reference had a naid crown and I never took it near the water!
 
Posts
208
Likes
80
From my understanding, the problem with the naid crown was not at high pressures, but at lower pressures near the surface. It worked assuming an external pressure pushing it in to make a tight seal. That worked fine at the 200m pressure test, but often failed when swimming!

hence the switch to a screw down. It was production, I think introduced in 1967 or 1968. My 1966 reference had a naid crown and I never took it near the water!

Riddle me this: What year was the Niad crown introduced on the Seamaster 300? And if the screw down crown update wasn't made until 1967 or 1968, how many years was the Niad crown installed on the 300?

What I'm getting at here is how could the 300 go so many years in production with a faulty crown before being fixed?
 
Posts
2,527
Likes
3,391
Riddle me this: What year was the Niad crown introduced on the Seamaster 300? And if the screw down crown update wasn't made until 1967 or 1968, how many years was the Niad crown installed on the 300?

What I'm getting at here is how could the 300 go so many years in production with a faulty crown before being fixed?

Naid was from 1957 on as far as I know.
 
Posts
208
Likes
80
Did Omega ever offer an antimagnetic movement dust cover for the Seamaster 300?
 
Posts
255
Likes
185
Thanks Archer. Do you know what year the screw down crown was phased in on the Seamaster 300?
As discussed in dedicated topic, to my database, the SD crow was available since 9/1969 to the public
Did Omega ever offer an antimagnetic movement dust cover for the Seamaster 300?
No. You don`t need dust cover in WR watches.
 
Posts
255
Likes
185
From my understanding, the problem with the naid crown was not at high pressures, but at lower pressures near the surface. It worked assuming an external pressure pushing it in to make a tight seal. That worked fine at the 200m pressure test, but often failed when swimming!

hence the switch to a screw down. It was production, I think introduced in 1967 or 1968. My 1966 reference had a naid crown and I never took it near the water!
Fully agree, it worked in theory, but in reality, the system was not ideal.
Although I have one SM300, which belonged to well know diver with hundreds of hours spent underwater and the movement is still pristine - tritium of course is deteriorated. But it was regulaly serviced watch.
 
Posts
255
Likes
185
Here's what's interesting about the "300" being just a model name theory: The Seamaster 120 was rated to 120 meters per the vintage ads!

The Seamaster 300 as pictured with the earlier Niad crown was rated a 200 meters. So why didn't Omega call the 300 instead the Seamaster 200?

Does anyone know when the screw down crown was first fitted on the 300? Was it during the production run? Or was it a service bulletin update that occurred after the watch was discontinued? Has anyone tried pressure testing the Niad and SCD at 300 meters?

More and more I`m into it it seems, that in the 60ties there was no way for Omega, how to massively test the watch to 30ATM, hence the guarantee the WR only to 200m.
And why they did not switch earlier? I think, that the issue with Naiad was not as terrible, as it may seems today. I think they silently changed the crown system, when having watch for service with water leak...
 
Posts
208
Likes
80
When was the Seamaster 300 officially discontinued by Omega? 1969, 1970, 1971?