- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
Vintage Omega on ebay - re-dial all?
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
x0x0
·Also that's a bit odd?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/275221151109?hash=item4014757d85:g:XxYAAOSwVpJiJOHG
The OMEGA not in the right place?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/275221151109?hash=item4014757d85:g:XxYAAOSwVpJiJOHG
The OMEGA not in the right place?
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,792
SkunkPrince
·I see two, the 246 and the 600. Everything else appears correct to me.
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
x0x0
·I see two, the 246 and the 600. Everything else appears correct to me.
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,792
SkunkPrince
·X x0x0really? even though the cross in on the text?
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,792
SkunkPrince
·Yes, Omega never used DELUXE and No.. 246 on a dial.
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
x0x0
·Oh perhaps I misunderstood you. Yes, the crosshairs intersect the text. That's how they all are.
- Posts
- 11,656
- Likes
- 20,371
Davidt
·1, 2, 3 and 6 are certainly redials. I don’t know about the rest as they’re out of my comfort zone.
Two in particular is so wrong it’s ridiculous
Two in particular is so wrong it’s ridiculous
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,792
SkunkPrince
·X x0x0I saw many cross that doesn't touch the text, so either can be correct historically?
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
x0x0
·The ones that don't are likely refinished.
That's mine, what do you think?
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,792
SkunkPrince
·X x0x0Woah, I didn't know that.
That's mine, what do you think?
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
x0x0
·Probably, though they did a pretty good job. It wouldn't bother me too much if I liked it.
- Posts
- 11,656
- Likes
- 20,371
- Posts
- 11,656
- Likes
- 20,371
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
- Posts
- 11,656
- Likes
- 20,371
Davidt
·X x0x0I mean, the main thing that screams at me its a redail it's the orange lume (? is that what it is?) that too bright imo, am I right?
Its just a terrible, poor quality, miss-matched, fantasy mess.
No SM600 dial belongs in this case.
This style of dial is a commonly used template for redials.
The quality of the print is poor.
- Posts
- 11,656
- Likes
- 20,371
Davidt
·X x0x0I see, how can you tell what's the year of the watch just by looking at it? Interesting
It’s more the reference/dial style. Ie yours looks like a 136.011? The ‘Technic’ version of this dial only appeared on the watch mid/late 60’s and the broken crosshair is correct.
An earlier Constellation on the other hand should have an unbroken crosshair.
