- Posts
- 45
- Likes
- 13
x0x0
·Its just a terrible, poor quality, miss-matched, fantasy mess.
No SM600 dial belongs in this case.
This style of dial is a commonly used template for redials.
The quality of the print is poor.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Its just a terrible, poor quality, miss-matched, fantasy mess.
No SM600 dial belongs in this case.
This style of dial is a commonly used template for redials.
The quality of the print is poor.
It’s more the reference/dial style. Ie yours looks like a 136.011? The ‘Technic’ version of this dial only appeared on the watch mid/late 60’s and the broken crosshair is correct.
An earlier Constellation on the other hand should have an unbroken crosshair.
3,4, and 7 are the only ones I'd posit are legit dials.
To me its always very interesting to see people at the start of their search into Vintage Omegas posting threads like this. One day you will look back and laugh that you could even partially consider some of these as even close to real. Here's a checklist I made for myself after paying the noob tax to ensure I would never again. I ensure to do all these steps before even considering to buy:
1. Knowing the reference number
2. Searching it up on Google and looking at other examples
3. Comparing the listing closely to the other examples
Warnings:
1. If its too good to be true, it probably is.
2. I'd honestly say 95%+ of Black Dialed Vintage Omegas are redialed, especially on ebay. Nice black vintage omegas do not go for cheap, especially if they are glossy dialed.
Not at the price he wants for it. Maybe $400 if I was *really* in love with that particular dial and saw no other way to get my hands on it.