Vintage Elgin folks - what say ye?

Posts
870
Likes
1,573
As some of you know I'm on a sort of 'pause' in my collecting while dealing with a shipping issue, but never hurts to look, right? 馃檮

Came across this Elgin with interesting detail on the case - at least a style I haven't seen before. The dial seems very clean for the era - 1920s as per seller - but possibly original. Then again, I'm not a vintage Elgin expert, so I offer it for opinions here:



Thanks for any input! ...And for helping keep me from being bored out of my mind!

*Edit: The dial at first struck me as off-alignment, but then I noticed the angle of the photo - no straight-on shot.
Edited:
 
Posts
4,340
Likes
10,277
1929.
The problem with older gold filled watches is the loss on the corners. Quite a bit missing at 7:00. Dial looks to be re-finished (very common). Don't worry about the misalignment. Older watches have some play in the case/movement and can be easily adjusted to square up.
Cool watch. Probably pretty small, though.
 
Posts
870
Likes
1,573
1929.
The problem with older gold filled watches is the loss on the corners. Quite a bit missing at 7:00. Dial looks to be re-finished (very common). Don't worry about the misalignment. Older watches have some play in the case/movement and can be easily adjusted to square up.
Cool watch. Probably pretty small, though.

Thanks - I mostly collect 60s-present; mind lending advice on the 'tells' for a dial refinish like this? I figured it had at least some 'work done' in such a long life, but fully admit I'm still learning what to look for on pre-war pieces especially. 馃榾

And oh, 29mm by 35mm w/16mm lugs, according to the seller, so definitely not huge but not atrociously tiny, either.
 
Posts
1,957
Likes
25,748
1929.
The problem with older gold filled watches is the loss on the corners. Quite a bit missing at 7:00. Dial looks to be re-finished (very common). Don't worry about the misalignment. Older watches have some play in the case/movement and can be easily adjusted to square up.
Cool watch. Probably pretty small, though.
You might be right about case wear at 7:00, then again it might be reflection and the level to which the photo has been magnified. I have a few dozen watches that showed similar "wear" in auction photos but turned out to be just fine in reality. Watches of this vintage are always a gamble unless the photos are of "professional" quality.
 
Posts
15,481
Likes
45,852
Looks like green gold. Sort of Art Deco, as well. Sharp. But the dial looks too good on a watch that has had enough use to wear through the gold filled layer.
 
Posts
870
Likes
1,573
Looks like green gold. Sort of Art Deco, as well. Sharp. But the dial looks too good on a watch that has had enough use to wear through the gold filled layer.

That was, and basically still remains, my original impression. Something suggests re-dial/restored dial to me, but I can't put a finger on what exactly aside from the cleanliness of the dial to the wear on the case ratio, even accounting for some reflection glare.
 
Posts
2,327
Likes
2,542
Looks like a redial to me but some watches that old or older can have ceramic glazed dials that look fresh from the factory a century later.
This doesn't look ceramic though.