I completely see your point, and I agree with your perspective. Collecting is such a personal experience, and the way we connect with pieces like the EW321 is entirely individual. Comparing it to reimagined classics like the Bronco or Mustang is spot on—these modern versions celebrate the spirit of the originals while offering updated features that make them more enjoyable for today’s owners like myself hence the doubts 😂
That said, from an investment perspective, vintage pieces often hold or increase their value more significantly over time, especially well-preserved examples of iconic models. For collectors focused on long-term value, a vintage EW in excellent condition might be the wiser choice. But collecting isn’t always about the financial side—it’s also about the joy and connection you feel with the piece.
To call the modern EW321 “fake” really doesn’t feel fair. It’s more of a tribute, designed for collectors who love the heritage but also appreciate modern quality. Thanks for sharing your perspective; it’s a great reminder of what makes this hobby so special!
I don’t agree with this assessment at all, this view is shared across other non-Omega forums. 90% of my collection is vintage, owning an EW321 is in no shape or form feel fake. Does the Bronco feel fake as a remake? Does the Mustang feel fake? It’s all relative. For me, owning a vintage EW in ’Good’ condition was unattainable. Most vintage EW don’t age well, dials have tons of issues and lume plots are prone to discoloration and are unattractive. The vintage EW I owned only lasted 6 months in my collection, I had no interest in keeping it. I could have spent considerably more at the time to get one in better condition, however I couldn’t justify it. In the other hand, I have loved owning my ‘65, ‘68, ‘69 and ‘71 Speedmasters mostly b/c I spent half the $$ as a vintage EW for a far better condition watch. So, when the EW 321 was announced, I put my name on the list on the first day. When I eventually got the call, I couldn’t believe how beautiful the watch looked and didn’t hesitate for a moment to purchase it from the AD. To say it’s a fake is a bit of a hyperbole. My 2 cents....
I completely see your point, and I agree with your perspective. Collecting is such a personal experience, and the way we connect with pieces like the EW321 is entirely individual. Comparing it to reimagined classics like the Bronco or Mustang is spot on—these modern versions celebrate the spirit of the originals while offering updated features that make them more enjoyable for today’s owners.
Vintage watches, like the original EW321, certainly have their allure, but they also come with challenges—aging dials, lume issues, and the difficulty of finding one in great condition. For many collectors, this can make vintage ownership feel less satisfying or even out of reach. The modern EW321 provides a perfect solution. It honors the original design while being reliable, beautifully crafted, and ready to wear without worry.
That said, from an investment perspective, vintage pieces often hold or increase their value more significantly over time, especially well-preserved examples of iconic models. For collectors focused on long-term value, a vintage EW in excellent condition might be the wiser choice. But collecting isn’t always about the financial side—it’s also about the joy and connection you feel with the piece.
To call the modern EW321 “fake” really doesn’t feel fair. It’s more of a tribute, designed for collectors who love the heritage but also appreciate modern quality. Your story about falling in love with the EW321 the moment you saw it says it all—it’s about what makes you happy in your collection. At the end of the day, collecting is about joy, not about following someone else’s rules. Thanks for sharing your perspective; it’s a great reminder of what makes this hobby so special!
