Vintage Ed White vs. Modern 321 – Second Thoughts?

Posts
158
Likes
105
Well, you weren't wrong there, Alex. People who spent $20k and more for average examples 4-5 years ago may be even more unhappy about the depreciation than us vintage Rolex owners! 😝
Anyone worried about depreciation isn't a collector, rather a trader or gambler and, for them, "unhappy" should be a familiar emotion.

Collectors, due to their long-term perspective, are generally quite happy with their collections and excited about the new additions.

Neither is better, just depends on which disposition one prefers.
 
Posts
20,238
Likes
46,923
Anyone worried about depreciation isn't a collector, rather a trader or gambler and, for them, "unhappy" should be a familiar emotion.

Collectors, due to their long-term perspective, are generally quite happy with their collections and excited about the new additions.

Neither is better, just depends on which disposition one prefers.
Not sure how many watches you own, or how much you have into them, but that's a bit simplistic in my view. Most collectors buy and sell all the time, so price matters.

And I can tell you from firsthand experience, that collectors get a little sad when they buy something for $20k, and then see it selling for $12k a few years later. It's hard not to think about what you could have done with that extra $8k.
 
Posts
8
Likes
13
Collecting watches makes you sometimes choose bad options. Considering the Ed. White with modern 321 buying an original straight lugs model in average condition is not a good idea.
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
Most collectors buy and sell all the time ... collectors get a little sad when they buy something for $20k, and then see it selling for $12k a few years later.
One might argue a trader who thinks of themselves as a collector is either a compromised trader, or a compromised collector.

That is, one can reasonably argue an expert collector is certain about each new collected piece and the price of adding that piece now; a compromised collector isn't sure and trades the mistakes. That is, either the piece & price are right for your collection today or they're not.

Similarly, an expert trader enjoys the emotional chase, but realizes there's a price for chasing.
Edited:
 
Posts
20,238
Likes
46,923
One might argue a trader who thinks of themselves as a collector is either a compromised trader, or a compromised collector.

That is, one can reasonably argue an expert collector is certain about each new collected piece and the price of adding that piece now; a compromised collector isn't sure and trades the mistakes. That is, either the piece & price are right for your collection today or they're not.

Similarly, an expert trader enjoys the emotional chase, but realizes there's a price for chasing.
I have no idea what this gibberish is supposed to mean, but you are obviously the expert about collecting. In theory, at least. ::facepalm1::
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
I have no idea what this gibberish is supposed to mean, but you are obviously the expert about collecting. In theory, at least. ::facepalm1::
It was meant to inspire discussion, but since it hasn't, we can conclude I'm definitely not the expert there! 🤙
 
Posts
24
Likes
19
One might argue a trader who thinks of themselves as a collector is either a compromised trader, or a compromised collector.

That is, one can reasonably argue an expert collector is certain about each new collected piece and the price of adding that piece now; a compromised collector isn't sure and trades the mistakes. That is, either the piece & price are right for your collection today or they're not.

Similarly, an expert trader enjoys the emotional chase, but realizes there's a price for chasing.
Collecting and trading can intersect, but to me they stem from different core mindsets. While a collector doesn’t need to justify every acquisition purely through potential financial gain, collecting can and often should be viewed as a form of investment. The emotional value and personal satisfaction of owning a piece can coexist with the understanding that certain collectibles hold or appreciate in value over time.

A well-informed collector can approach their passion with the same strategic mindset as a trader, ensuring that their choices not only align with their vision but also make financial sense. There's no rule that says collecting must involve losing money 🤔...on the contrary, the best collections are often those that balance personal passion with market insight, resulting in a portfolio that’s both meaningful and financially sound.

In this way, collecting becomes a deeply personal investment, offering both the joy of ownership and the potential for long-term value. A collector doesn’t have to flip or trade pieces to profit, but also don’t need to disregard the financial aspects of their acquisitions. Collecting smartly ensures that the pursuit remains both fulfilling and sustainable.
 
Posts
29,582
Likes
35,568
I’d actually go the modern Ed White as it’s a genuine pain getting a good vintage one, which you would then be somewhat afraid of getting banged up. The modern one also has a vastly superior bracelet which is a big positive, I only ever wore my straight lug Speedys with a strap since the flat-links are not a great bracelet for anything more than photos imo.
 
Posts
212
Likes
210
For me personally, spending thousands on a vintage watch is almost asking for trouble. There's so many pitfalls you can fall into, in terms of making sure it's all genuine and original, and in good condition. I don't have the expertise to be sure enough of what I'm buying to do it. Having said that, if I was confident enough in my knowledge of vintage speedmasters I'd probably go vintage, but I like the assurance of buying a new, modern watch.
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
Collecting and trading can intersect, but to me they stem from different core mindsets ... ensuring that their choices not only align with their vision but also make financial sense.
Interesting points ... though is the last part redundant?

That is, collecting is emotional and NEVER makes financial sense because there's never a rational reason to have the thing in the first place. e.g., unless your intention is investing / trading, there's no rational reason to buy & hold ("collect") a $5k+ time device.

The minute one allows "but I could always re-sell it for profit" or "it's worth more than I paid!" into the equation, as pleasing as that is, now they've compromised the collector emotions with the dopa hits of investing / trading, and once they do that they're not collecting.

The exception to those definitions might be someone who uses trading to fund collecting pieces they'd rather not or can't pay for, ie trades up to the big prize.

For example, they want to buy & hold forever ("collect") a Grönefeld so they use market data & instinct to buy a used Sinn and begin trading up with market trends until they can afford the new Grönefeld.

The pure collector might say, "my time if most valuable as a rocket scientist, so I'll use my income from that to fund my Grönefeld collection"

TLDR: "financial sense" for a pure collector might be "the price is right today to add that piece to my permanent collection & my kids can worry about market values after I'm gone since once I acquire it I don't care any more."

(note: this is purely fun discussion intended to make us all go hmm, nothing else)
 
Posts
27,359
Likes
69,758
One might argue a trader who thinks of themselves as a collector is either a compromised trader, or a compromised collector.

That is, one can reasonably argue an expert collector is certain about each new collected piece and the price of adding that piece now; a compromised collector isn't sure and trades the mistakes. That is, either the piece & price are right for your collection today or they're not.

Similarly, an expert trader enjoys the emotional chase, but realizes there's a price for chasing.
This is a very simplistic and binary view. Collectors buy and sell often, and in a great deal of those instances it's buying a better example of the watch and selling on the lesser example you had. Regardless if you are a trader or collector, if you are actively buying or selling watches, pricing is important.
 
Posts
20,238
Likes
46,923
This is a very simplistic and binary view. Collectors buy and sell often, and in a great deal of those instances it's buying a better example of the watch and selling on the lesser example you had. Regardless if you are a trader or collector, if you are actively buying or selling watches, pricing is important.
Yep.
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
This is a very simplistic and binary view.
That's my specialty!

But I guess there's lots of agreement here that being a "collector" is a pretty complex thing.
 
Posts
27,359
Likes
69,758
That's my specialty!

But I guess there's lots of agreement here that being a "collector" is a pretty complex thing.
Good sense of humour...I like it. 👍

Let's look at a pretty obvious example - Spacefruit. He dives deep into the details on Speedmasters, publishes valuable information for anyone who wants it on his site, AND he tracks prices based on real life transactions (which he also publishes). I don't think anyone here who is familiar with him would doubt that he is a collector, and a passionate one at that, but he regularly buys and sells a lot of Speedmasters.

In fact, if you read this story he bought one from someone here who later said they had regrets over selling a family heirloom, and Spacefruit completed restoring the watch for him and sold it back...


I don't see that as something a "trader" would do...
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
I don't think anyone here who is familiar with him would doubt that he is a collector
[ nice guy stuff ]
I don't see that as something a "trader" would do...
Good points; didn't mean to imply there's any "right" or for anyone to take the discussion personally, just fun discussion. Obviously the definitions are whatever anyone wants them to be.

With that, notionally, I tend to (wrong I guess?) think of "collectors" as buy & hold types ... and I probably couldn't write up a better definition of a trader in any pursuit better than you did here:

  • publishes valuable information [on target asset],
  • tracks [asset] prices based on real life transactions (which he also publishes)
  • regularly buys and sells a lot of [asset]

That kind of sounds like the Wall Street Journal of trading speedmasters, no?
 
Posts
27,359
Likes
69,758
Good points; didn't mean to imply there's any "right" or for anyone to take the discussion personally, just fun discussion. Obviously the definitions are whatever anyone wants them to be.

With that, notionally, I tend to (wrong I guess?) think of "collectors" as buy & hold types ... and I probably couldn't write up a better definition of a trader in any pursuit better than you did here:

  • publishes valuable information [on target asset],
  • tracks [asset] prices based on real life transactions (which he also publishes)
  • regularly buys and sells a lot of [asset]

That kind of sounds like the Wall Street Journal of trading speedmasters, no?
By "trader" (a term not widely used as far as I've seen) do you mean "dealer"? That is what I have assumed, and if so, then no that's not at all what I would expect a dealer to do. I expect dealers to hold their cards close to their chests, not publish their buying/selling prices, and to use the knowledge they have to their advantage, not spread it around freely to educate their marks...err...customers.

If "trader" is something different in how you are using it, then I'm not sure what it is you are saying.
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
I'm not sure what it is you are saying.
I'm familiar with it.

No, by "trader" I meant a hobbyist who buys & sells watches for fun and/or profit. They're concerned with real-time prices because they both sell and buy.

By "collector" I meant a hobbyist who buys & holds; they don't really care about the price after purchase because they already own it & don't plan on selling it, ie they only "collect" things.

But, yeah, maybe it's time to 🥸
 
Posts
27,359
Likes
69,758
By "collector" I meant a hobbyist who buys & holds; they don't really care about the price after purchase because they already own it & don't plan on selling it, ie they only "collect" things.
Again, this is an unusual and overly literal view of what "collector" means - maybe this is a language barrier thing? I have no idea if English is your first language or not.

Of course you can attach whatever meaning you want to it, but doing so here would likely cause confusion. Many people here would call themselves collectors, and they regularly buy and sell in the effort of building their collection - if you want to tell them they are not collectors, be prepared for some push back.

By the way, people who "only collect things" are commonly known as hoarders...
 
Posts
11,312
Likes
19,808
In the watch collecting world I’d say collectors who only buy to keep and never sell are the exception, not the rule.
I’m a collector but I buy and sell several watches a year. Sometimes because I find a better one, sometimes because I decide I just don’t want that particular watch or model any more, sometimes I want to free up cash for another watch (or a different reason) and I can’t afford to do both and the main reason; because I like buying watches. I like buying barn finds, which look terrible, cleaning them up, wearing them for a period of time and selling. Sometimes at a profit, some times break even and occasionally at a loss. But, I simply can’t afford to keep everything I buy, it would cost me tens of thousands a year.

To your point (I think), the whole reason I feel comfortable doing this is that I know the market for certain models and can generally buy for less than I sell. There’s always an element of risk and sometimes I get burned, that’s fine as long as I at least break even over a period of time.

Additionally, to a degree, anyone can go to a dealer and buy pretty much any vintage watch they want. If they pay the premium. But where’s the fun in that. It’s the hunt that’s the fun, finding the diamond in the rough for a good deal and bringing it back to life.

I’m sure I have a point in there somewhere
 
Posts
66
Likes
76
My main concern with any vintage watch is how well maintained it was by the previous owner. Followed very closely by availability of parts if repairs are needed. Given a choice, I'd always choose the more modern, all else being equal.