Vintage Constellation mania

Posts
307
Likes
901
Hi guys,
during the last months I came back to have a focus on vintage constellation watches only.
I sold some of my “modern” omega, so I’m ready to start my next trip

These are two interesting pieces for me:

Constellation Gran Luxe
Ref 14398 sc
Cal 561
18kt solid gold
Asking price 4000€ (physical shop)
Some doubts on crown reference
(I m waiting pics about caliber and internal caseback)

Constellation
Ref 167.005
Cal 551
Stainless steel
Asking price 1000€ (private seller)
Dial have some signs (maybe water?)
Crown aftermarket?

what do u think about their status and value?

many thanks
 
Posts
8,624
Likes
61,380
If it is only between these two, I pick #1 but at a much lower price.



But I would keep looking into other references and best condition types
 
Posts
307
Likes
901
If it is only between these two, I pick #1 but at a much lower price.

But I would keep looking into other references and best condition types

Thanks @TexOmega.
Could u please describe your opinion about the value of the first and what do u think about its condition?

I see some similar examples sold in famous auctions at 2500€ 10 years ago

Many thanks
 
Posts
8,624
Likes
61,380
Appears to me the crown shows the wrong color

Appears to me they attempted to manipulate the pix enough to get a sharper case, lugs especially

I'd rather have another cal than a 561 in a watch with an RE
 
Posts
337
Likes
1,004
I'd rather have another cal than a 561 in a watch with an RE

Yes, or to put it another way: You would rather have a cal 504 with that dial. But then it could not be a ref 14398, which, btw, I have not yet seen with a snap back. So OP should definitely wait for pics of case back and movement.

As to the second watch: The lugs seem to be heavily polished. Also, I would try for a dial in better condition for that price.
 
Posts
307
Likes
901
Yes, or to put it another way: You would rather have a cal 504 with that dial. But then it could not be a ref 14398, which, btw, I have not yet seen with a snap back. So OP should definitely wait for pics of case back and movement.

As to the second watch: The lugs seem to be heavily polished. Also, I would try for a dial in better condition for that price.

What SnapBack do u expect with this ref?
I will post the pics asap.

The second watch could be good at 500€ but for sure the lugs seem over polished.

thanks @aprax
 
Posts
4,828
Likes
12,220
The second watch could be good at 500€ but for sure the lugs seem over polished.

I would not be interested in adding the second watch to my collection at any price. Doglegs really do not look good when over polished, and I am not a fan of the speckled dial. With the prices as they have been lately, I suspect you could probably get most of your money back if you had to sell it later. It's to you what you think of the condition.
 
Posts
337
Likes
1,004
If I am correct 14398s have screw backs (as opposed to snap-on backs like the one of the first watch you posted). Also, in my experience, they usually come with "missing text" dials, i.e. they lack the words "officially certified". The dial of the watch you posted looks like it could belong to a previous generation deluxe model 2954 which would have a cal. 504 (and a snap-on back).
It could also be possible, that the watch you posted is some sort of a transitional version of 14398 using the new generation movements but with the old dial layout.
 
Posts
24,585
Likes
54,589
The 167.005 is not in good condition, definitely not the watch for a collector of Constellations.
 
Posts
307
Likes
901
If I am correct 14398s have screw backs (as opposed to snap-on backs like the one of the first watch you posted). Also, in my experience, they usually come with "missing text" dials, i.e. they lack the words "officially certified". The dial of the watch you posted looks like it could belong to a previous generation deluxe model 2954 which would have a cal. 504 (and a snap-on back).
It could also be possible, that the watch you posted is some sort of a transitional version of 14398 using the new generation movements but with the old dial layout.

now I understand better, my English is not so good
In my research I found some 14398 with “official certified” on dial but no with snap-on backs.
I hope to update the thread asap with the new pics.
Have a nice weekend and thanks for your time.
 
Posts
13,426
Likes
18,635
Top watch is more likely a Ref. 2988:

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-constellation-calendar-grand-luxe-ot-2988

Cal. 504? Check. 18K gold with gold dial?, Check. Press-in case back? Check.

These sometimes came with gold bracelets, like this example:



https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auc...ga-constellation-retailed-by-meister-a-yellow

You need to be careful that the sharp edges on the lugs are not heavily polished. I can’t tell the condition from the pictures provided, but you can see the edges clearly on the Sotheby’s example.

If it all checks out OK, I don’t think the price is ridiculous, but if you can get it down a few hundred euros, it would be a better value.

Good luck,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
307
Likes
901
Hi guys,
the “professional” seller said me that open the caseback is too difficult and without a real offer I can’t have infos About reference and caliber 😵‍💫
I don’t understand how customers could have interest and buy an expensive watch without know and see these infos.
Tomorrow I will switch my communication from text to voice.
In this moment I believe that he find the reference num from a similar watch on website and add it on sale so maybe the watch could be an older model.
I will update the post
 
Posts
13,426
Likes
18,635
I don’t understand how customers could have interest and buy an expensive watch without know and see these infos.
Because such sellers only want to do business with those that ask no questions.
In this moment I believe that he find the reference num from a similar watch on website and add it on sale so maybe the watch could be an older model.
Maybe he found the reference number on my post above? 🙄 I can tell you that he has not updated the listing at this time.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
304
Likes
681
I don’t understand how customers could have interest and buy an expensive watch without know and see these infos.
Its not so bad, when the seller does not really know, what he has, if only you know, what it is, yes with a risc. You sometimes may get a bargain!
This is obviously a ref 2988 with cal 504 and in my view more attractive than the later 14.398 or even 168.002 with cal 561.
It would have been in my collection, if it would not miss the 18k bracelet. With a little discount the price is not too bad, when you prefer a leather bracelet.
And about sharp edges, how could I aspect them at a watch 60 years old? Gold is forever, worn or not.
The pristine watch from Sothebys may have achieved a much much higher price, than we see in 'normal' offerings (or the sale is long, long ago).
Look at mine at my wrist, doesn't it look great regardles of worn edges?
Konrad

Edited:
 
Posts
7,958
Likes
36,084
If I am correct 14398s have screw backs (as opposed to snap-on backs like the one of the first watch you posted). Also, in my experience, they usually come with "missing text" dials, i.e. they lack the words "officially certified". The dial of the watch you posted looks like it could belong to a previous generation deluxe model 2954 which would have a cal. 504 (and a snap-on back).
It could also be possible, that the watch you posted is some sort of a transitional version of 14398 using the new generation movements but with the old dial layout.
2954's have both 're' and 'er' spelling of chronometer. So before they stopped with the 504 and moved over to the 561 the spelling had already changed. I've never seen a 561 with 're' spelling
 
Posts
142
Likes
200
I would not be interested in adding the second watch to my collection at any price. Doglegs really do not look good when over polished, and I am not a fan of the speckled dial. With the prices as they have been lately, I suspect you could probably get most of your money back if you had to sell it later. It's to you what you think of the condition.
That Ref 167.005 once was mine, bcs. of the lugs and dial i sold it quite cheap. 1000€ ist too much...
 
Posts
19
Likes
2
Hi guys,
during the last months I came back to have a focus on vintage constellation watches only.
I sold some of my “modern” omega, so I’m ready to start my next trip

These are two interesting pieces for me:

Constellation Gran Luxe
Ref 14398 sc
Cal 561
18kt solid gold
Asking price 4000€ (physical shop)
Some doubts on crown reference
(I m waiting pics about caliber and internal caseback)

Constellation
Ref 167.005
Cal 551
Stainless steel
Asking price 1000€ (private seller)
Dial have some signs (maybe water?)
Crown aftermarket?

what do u think about their status and value?

many thanks
I see your constellations have both variations of "Chronometer" and "Chronometre" - any idea why the differing spelling?
 
Posts
6,445
Likes
9,966
I see your constellations have both variations of "Chronometer" and "Chronometre" - any idea why the differing spelling?

The simple answer is ‘timing’.

Omega initially spelled the word the French way but towards the end of the 50s changed the spelling to the English way.

Confusion sometimes arises during the transition period where both French and English versions are used within the same reference or similar aged references .
 
Posts
19
Likes
2
The simple answer is ‘timing’.

Omega initially spelled the word the French way but towards the end of the 50s changed the spelling to the English way.

Confusion sometimes arises during the transition period where both French and English versions are used within the same reference or similar aged references .
Thanks. My Dad's Omega is 1958 and spelled the French way. He was born and bred in France and I wondered if he'd bought the watch on a visit back to France or on one of his trips to West Africa.
 
Posts
6,445
Likes
9,966
Thanks. My Dad's Omega is 1958 and spelled the French way. He was born and bred in France and I wondered if he'd bought the watch on a visit back to France or on one of his trips to West Africa.
He may well have done but ‘58 is roughly the spelling transition point and dating Omegas from serial numbers is not an exact science.

Even if you know for sure that the watch was bought in 58 it could have been manufactured up to a couple of years earlier.

The issue comes when certain watches have the French spelling when they are clearly past the transition time or clearly pre the transition time - that’s when you know they are redials
However, whilst It would be nice and easy if there was a definitive cut off -for both date and reference- there are a small number of references that could have both spellings and be correct.