Video: Omega Seamaster Pro 300M Ceramic Review

Posts
173
Likes
184

Omega Seamaster Professional 300M Co-Axial With Ceramic Bezel
Reference 212.30.41.20.03.001
Powered By Omega's Co-Axial Calibre 2500D Chronometer Movement


It's hard to imagine its been over 20 years since the original Seamaster Pro 300M Diver, reference 2531.80 was released back in 1993. Since then, its gone on to become one of the iconic Seamasters with a production run that between three iterations has now exceeded the lifespan of the original Omega Seamaster 300 diver of the 50s and 60s.

Powered by the accurate and durable Calibre 2500D three level Co-Axial Chronometer movement, with an upgraded version of the intricate yet substantial solid link “Bond" bracelet, an excellent clasp mechanism and helium escape valve. The new ceramic Seamaster Pro is a watch different in nearly every way and yet still so similar to its predecessors from the 90s and 2000s.

The new bezel is made from highly scratch resistant solid ceramic, with inlayed indices made from extremely tough chromium nitride, marking a significant upgrade over the relatively fragile painted aluminium of previous versions. This alone is one of the nicest upgrades on the Seamaster Pro, it has this look and feel of glass that makes you want to touch it, yet repels those marks and scratches that damaged the old aluminium bezel (which was not cheap to replace either).

While the classic bond bracelet remains aesthetically the same, the older pin and bushing method of securing links has been replaced by a new screw system, which is a fantastic improvement that was well overdue. Rather than a single screw, Omega uses two screws one on either end which hold in place a central bushing which carries the stress but is not friction fit.

The movement new ceramic Seamasters use the D revision of the Calibre 2500 Co-Axial movement, incorporating the improved three level Co-Axial escapement operating at 25,200 vhp, a similar configuration to that used in the Calibre 8500 rather than the two level version seen in A, B and C models. While some prefer the 8500 movement and display back the 2500 does keep the Seamaster Pro significantly thinner than the Planet Ocean and in a very reasonable price segment.

Luminous material on the dial and hands glows a bright blue, with the exception of the minute hand and bezel pip, which are both a strong green for contrast, making at a glance reading of elapsed time easier for divers.

The new dial is a major departure for the Seamaster Pro line, with the traditional wave pattern painted dial being replaced by a gorgeously finished glossy blue ceramic that catches light to change colour from a vivid blue to a deep navy depending on the angle. The applied Omega logo and hour indices are made from solid white gold, and almost appear as if they're floating the glassy smooth dial. As an owner of previous Seamaster Pro models I’ll definitely miss the wave dial and some will probably prefer it but in person the gloss finish dials are remarkably clean to look at and certainly do fit with the style of the bezel nicely.

Omega has also changed the clasp, with the Seamaster Professional wording replaced by a simple and elegant Omega logo placed in the centre.

The level and detail of Omega's finishing on the Seamaster Pro has really been taken to a higher level level with this new ceramic version and they should be commended for that. The Seamaster Pro 300M always was a popular watch but it really seems like they’ve been listening to customer feedback on small gripes such as the bezel, clasp design, sizing mechanism and movement and endeavoured to step up all areas to meet owner’s demands.

These really are a watch designed to be worn every single day of its owners life, in all conditions, decade after decade, and so many of the 1990s 2531.80s have performed just that service. For that reason, if I had to choose just one timepiece to wear long term, the Seamaster Pro Ceramic would be among the top contenders, especially given its very reasonable pricing within Omega’s lineup.



Fantastic video and fantastic Post!! What do you think about the new Omega SM 300 professional?? The one with the calibre 8800?
 
Posts
9,053
Likes
46,931
I love mine. It’s just about the perfect all occasion watch. And so distinctive. Nothing else looks like it. Although the new model has superior technology, the 2012-2017 version has the best aesthetics IMHO.
Edited:
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Mine has a white background behind the date? Had it for ten years plus and still looking brand new. Never take it off. Great piece.
 
Posts
346
Likes
1,039
Great review! Nicely captured the beauty of the watch! Cheers!
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
I love mine. It’s just about the perfect all occasion watch. And so distinctive. Nothing else looks like it. Although the new model has superior technology, the 2012-2017 version has the best aesthetics IMHO.

View attachment 807466
Agreed
 
Posts
1
Likes
1
saf saf
Just loved the review- indeed one of the best ones so far..and excellent photography- omega should hire you guys 😀
good to know they used white gold for the applied logo and indices-
got mine in black dial 2days ago 😀 i had been eyeing this for quite a while and once I learned aluminim is replaced with ceramic bezel- it was an easy choice to make
And i totally love the lacquer and wont miss the waves 😀
Omg, the waves 🤮
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
Sans waves is much better
We have all three in our house. Smooth dial is the prettiest...just not the most iconic. New wave growing on me, in black & white it looks a little less toy-ish. On the bezel, I do not understand the move from chromium nitride to enamel...other than higher contrast. Chromium and ceramic are much more durable. Subdued visibility is a less garish look to me, plus I can't damage it as easily. I love this one and eventually bought it just before the stock of brand new smooth dial, chromium nitride bezel inlay dried up around here.
 
Posts
1
Likes
0
I felt the SMP 300 ...212.30.41.20.03.001 was a bit fancy because of the bracelet and open hands. I picked up a Tudor Black Bay 58. . It fits very well on my 6.5 wrist. and I know always know the date since it does not have a date and I remeber the date every day now. I gave the SMP to my son. That seemed like a better idea than loosing $1500 with a trade in (only lost $4000 this way Duh), I really miss the SMP, but he has agreed to share it with me. Now he wants me to buy a Rolex Sub we can share. Great idea, for him
 
Posts
323
Likes
1,131
Great review & thread, this has definitely fueled my recent obsession/fascination with the SMPc in blue 😁 now how do I sneak one into the house without the eagle eyed missus noticing!
 
Posts
11
Likes
5
👍 Great review. I really like the blue and I'm glad this generation of Seamasters didnt incorporate the wave design on the bezel. It makes this gen very clean and unique. Definately a standout while keeping a thin profile.
Pair this with the 2500D and youve got a champ!
 
Posts
1,359
Likes
6,073
Looks a bit instagrammed, but I still love the blue 😀

I'm a little proud to say that, in all honesty, I have no idea what " a bit instagrammed" might mean.😀😀
 
Posts
59
Likes
99
After reading this review now I want to get a SMPc lol. Job well done.
 
Posts
233
Likes
326
I watched the video only now... my bad! Now i regret not pulling the trigger on this seamaster! I prefer it over the current "cupcake" version!
 
Posts
39
Likes
90
Will the ceramic bezel from this fit the earlier Seamaster Pro, mines from 1999.
 
Posts
38
Likes
50
Nice vid I still greatly prefer the classic 2254.50 generation sword hands SMP though.
+1