Alright, wow, that's pretty gorgeous. Great balance of classy and sporty. But 41mm, meh, I hope they'll introduce the same models in 39mm And they're ridden with the usual lack-of-6-oclock-index disease
Getting better for sure, but I wish that Omega would come out with something more reminiscent of the 50's and 60's Constellations. The pie pan Globemaster was a nice start and has some of the vintage Constellation design elements. I wish that Omega would ditch the Roman numerals on the bezel and the "Griffin" claws on the contemporary Constellations. I've never been a fan of either.
I'm not a fan of them either but much like the He valve on the Seamaster and the tachy scale on the Speedmaster, these are almost defining characteristics of the (more recent) Constellation line aren't they? EDIT: Sorry, should've done my homework first! The design is linked back to the Manhattan models, not the Constellations of old. I hate the date cyclops on any watch but some people find it endearing. Well, more than some given the popularity on Rolex watches.
When my eye sight starts to deteriorate and I still want to see the date on my watch, I'll get something with a "big date" feature. A practical, elegant and visually attractive solution instead of a magnifying glass on the crystal . While I've never been a fan of the Constellation line (prefer the De Ville) the ceramic bezel does have a modern day charm.
Too big for a dress watch, these decisions must be made years in advance, market clearly going smaller
Thanks, unfortunately the 39mm models don't (yet ?) have a ceramic bezel, which makes them more feminine and less appealing to me. With the coloured ceramic, the "claws" are less prominent ; or rather, they are better integrated in the overall design IMHO. Although I'm a sucker for grey/blue dials...
I've always had a love/hate view of this model; Overall, the design is really cool, but I could never move past the Roman numerals around the bezel.
I got to see them up close but I feel like they took one step forward with the Globemaster and three steps backward with these.
Agree with previous sentiments that this is too big for a dress watch... maybe Omega was intending this to be more a casual watch, like the Vacheron Constantin Overseas. I find the integrated bracelets introduced with the 39mm Manhattan update last year to be an aesthetic upgrade over the previous Manhattan bracelet design.... hopefully it's not as heavy as the bracelet on the Globemaster. But in other areas, as Dedlock said so succinctly: 1 step forward, but 3 steps back for the Constellation line. On the plus side, at least this upsized 41mm range gets the 8900 movement with a silent rotor! Major upgrade over that swirl-swirl-swirl... noise that the 8806 makes on the wrist.
Said it before, going to save my keyboard and just post it again: [Bienne, morning] "Let's have Roman numerals on the bezel." "OK - but some people want baton markers." "Sure, why not, those too! The first Manhattans put them on the bezel." "Put the batons on the dial and the Romans on the bezel, and you got a deal." "Wait, guys, you said we could have the claws!" "There's still plenty of room! - put 'em on!!!" Two out of three, and you have style. If one of the elements is the claws, you have a distinctive look, copyright Omega. But the whole shebang ("no-one said diamonds yet, where do I put 'em?"), and you have, frankly, a messy smorgasbord of Omega visual cues put together by the marketing department. Globemaster is in the great tradition, these things are not. Just my opinion...
If there's one thing I can't stand on a watch it has to be Roman numerals and the modern Constellation line has been stuck on them for way too long now. A big pass from me.