Universal Geneve Watches On Ebay

Posts
5,632
Likes
8,752
Interesting one. Ref 289. Seems to be legit but contains obvious flaw
 
Posts
41
Likes
64
Does anyone have thoughts on whether this is the original dial?

I noticed that
1) There is no circle around the days on the moonphase subdial
2) The minutes subdial counts by 5s instead of 3s (5,10,15,20,25,30 instead of 3,6,9,12,15...30)

I am not sure whether either of these things indicate that the dial is definitely not original. However, it seems like most of the 'original' 40s dials I've seen do not have 1) or 2)
 
Posts
3,268
Likes
7,752
Does anyone have thoughts on whether this is the original dial?

I noticed that
1) There is no circle around the days on the moonphase subdial
2) The minutes subdial counts by 5s instead of 3s (5,10,15,20,25,30 instead of 3,6,9,12,15...30)

I am not sure whether either of these things indicate that the dial is definitely not original. However, it seems like most of the 'original' 40s dials I've seen do not have 1) or 2)

it's an original dial. whether it started life in that case would require more brain cells than I can muster at the moment. you could start by documenting every 12553 you can find. It is worth noting that many of the archives pics for 122XX and 125XX have 3/6/9, but a fair number of them have 5/10/15, however we cannot date the archives pics without case serial, so we don't know what year they are from.

offhand, just on first impressions, this watch was not ringing alarm bells IMO
 
Posts
5,632
Likes
8,752
Well not a watch which I would give to a random watchmaker but a competent one could service this for under USD 1000
 
Posts
5,632
Likes
8,752
Happens more often:

 
Posts
5,632
Likes
8,752
Sold long ago but still very interesting. Ref 12464

 
Posts
855
Likes
2,342
looks to be the last 3 digits of the case serial. I wonder why?

Omega did that too on some models from 30s and 40s I think its simply for the casemaker to match case + caseback in the factory but some1 correct me if Im wrong..