Universal Geneve “Prototype” Compax

Posts
865
Likes
2,371
Agree really cool. It's up to 5 different case refs now that I've seen this dial appear in 🧐So avant garde for the time - in the 40s they were already in the 60s! Maybe they thought it ugly back then so it never caught on and went into mass production..
 
Posts
6,256
Likes
9,814
Good question. I've seen similar markings but I have no clue what they mean
 
Posts
2,784
Likes
5,853
No. 3 of 4 😉

Seller claims: "Weniger als 5 Exemplare sind bekannt." (less than 5 known)
 
Posts
428
Likes
5,636
weird handset
what do you think the "3" is below the case reference?
Odd indeed. Some Polerouter Subs (Gen 2, 2nd Execution) have a similar marking but on the inside of the caseback to indicate bezel color variation. Not sure how thatight relate to this reference. Could there have been some type of planned minor variation necessitating a 1, 2, or 3?

Or maybe since it's a prototype they added that number to more clearly identify which of the handful of prototypes it is.
 
Posts
3,468
Likes
8,060
Odd indeed. Some Polerouter Subs (Gen 2, 2nd Execution) have a similar marking but on the inside of the caseback to indicate bezel color variation. Not sure how thatight relate to this reference. Could there have been some type of planned minor variation necessitating a 1, 2, or 3?

Or maybe since it's a prototype they added that number to more clearly identify which of the handful of prototypes it is.
There's no indication from UG these are prototypes, it's just a nickname being loosely thrown around. We have UG archives pics of these dials in two different gold cases, but no UG archives pics for steel cases. Doesn't mean they couldn't exist, but we don't have any documentation from UG. I think this is the first time we are seeing these dials in this paticular case reference, the other steel examples are Spillman. Not sure if this reference is also a spillman case? I don't know how to identify the makers on SS cases since they don't have the hammerhead.

Anyhow there's no way to know if the extra digit is related to the dial, or if the dial came with the case originally. I guess to start would need to track every other example of this case ref that can be found, and see if any others have the extra number below. The fact that the hands don't match any other example so far, and are a mix of blued and silver, and lume hands with no lume dial, isn't an especially convincing starting point in terms of this being a factory configuration IMO.
 
Posts
428
Likes
5,636
There's no indication from UG these are prototypes, it's just a nickname being loosely thrown around. We have UG archives pics of these dials in two different gold cases, but no UG archives pics for steel cases. Doesn't mean they couldn't exist, but we don't have any documentation from UG. I think this is the first time we are seeing these dials in this paticular case reference, the other steel examples are Spillman. Not sure if this reference is also a spillman case? I don't know how to identify the makers on SS cases since they don't have the hammerhead.

Anyhow there's no way to know if the extra digit is related to the dial, or if the dial came with the case originally. I guess to start would need to track every other example of this case ref that can be found, and see if any others have the extra number below. The fact that the hands don't match any other example so far, and are a mix of blued and silver, and lume hands with no lume dial, isn't an especially convincing starting point in terms of this being a factory configuration IMO.
It does not look terribly convincing to my eyes either. Maybe, just maybe, the 3 is indication of this different handset or a similar variation. Yet another fun mystery to unravel, but obviously just speculation and guesses for now, and we may never know.
 
Posts
3,468
Likes
8,060
I don’t know if they would be willing to share case reference and serial

 
Posts
3,468
Likes
8,060
Alpolso is the IG account, not someone that I know personally but obviously a serious UG collector, I think Italian?
 
Posts
6,256
Likes
9,814
Never shares numbers
 
Posts
428
Likes
5,636
Seems worth an ask. All they can do is say No or not respond.
 
Posts
485
Likes
811
why putting it here?
I think you need to read this whole thread again back to 2017; starting with the initial post. Menta Watches is mentioned in the very first sentence of this thread. Adam (MW), also wrote on this thread numerous times.
 
Posts
1,040
Likes
3,777
I remember very well this thread but I still don't see the point; it's a thread regarding dials, not sellers. Just IMHO of course.
 
Posts
334
Likes
600
@pereztroika wrote an article about mantawatches selling a Rolex with a fake Khanjar dial. Link here.

Big debate ensued on the IG post of the article. In one of the comments someone cited that this isn't the first time Adam has sold watch with a dubious dial.

Kingflum posted that comment with a link to this thread.

Tenuous link at best.