time flies
·I hear he has a book deal.
have fun
have fun
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
It’s morally wrong, some people want these watches but can’t buy them unless they pay well over the odds. Some people have bought these just to try and get a quick profit, depriving watch collectors who would happily keep the watch, wear it and never sell it.
He just did what most people do, what does his work place have to do with anything.
It has everything to do with it since he works for an AD and took pictures of the watch to sell at an AD. This is a terrible look for the AD and really poor judgement displayed by Lars. If he were just some regular Joe selling the watch and posting pictures from his home, no one would care. By using the AD to display the watch it makes it look like he gamed the system to profit.
Or did the OP of this thread click on Lars' profile page and find out that he is a student working part-time while studying economics, and decide to link the two pages together in his original post for whatever reason?
Have you seen his ad on Facebook? Was the AD where he works identified in the ad? Did Lars state in his ad that he worked at an Omega dealer?
Or did the OP of this thread click on Lars' profile page and find out that he is a student working part-time while studying economics, and decide to link the two pages together in his original post for whatever reason?
I took a screenshot of his ad, a screenshot of his public FB profile and Gjertsen’s front page and stitched them together to provide context that was at that point undisputed given the lengthy discussion that had just transpired on Klokkeriet
Perhaps you could explain your motive for doing that and bringing this to OF in the first place.
It's kind of funny that someone who has made more than a few posts lately about the Tintin watch, and its alleged meteoric rise in value, has a case of the vapors at someone else acquiring a watch legitimately through the standard Omega process and then selling it for a profit. Spare me the BS about morality or impugning the kid's character. Literally anyone who follows Omega's social media channels had an opportunity to reserve this watch. I had one reserved, but decided to cancel so someone on the wait list could get one. Does that make me morally superior to this kid because I didn't flip? Of course not - I thought about it but figured someone here might have the opportunity to snag it, so I passed. More power to the kid because he took the initiative and the risk - as there was no guarantee he could sell it for more than he paid. These are luxury goods that no one "needs". The moralizing about it is comical.
Perhaps you could explain your motive for doing that and bringing this to OF in the first place.
Can someone (@Robert-Jan maybe?) please enlighten me: what happens if a watch is delivered to an OB/AD and the person who legitimately placed the order online like the other 2011 who did (I was late by a couple of minute only... grrr...) decides to NOT pay for it when he sees/handles it in the shop, simply because he doesn't want it anymore? Does the watch "go back" to the (1) local DC (2) continental DC (3) global DC - to please the next guy in the waiting list ? (preferably: me 😁)...
...or can a smart young salesman pick it up on the spot for his own "enjoyment"? I'm just asking....
It's quite simple, if someone doesn't want his allocated piece it is offered to the next in line on the waiting list. .