Tudor Oyster Royal 1956: Original Dial or Redial?

Posts
24,658
Likes
54,773
Welcome to OF. Here is an original dial from I watch I owned at one time, from the same era. You can make comparisons. Although I will say that it can be difficult from one highly distorted and compressed photo.

 
Posts
4,417
Likes
10,620
From the web.



I would say yes, it is a redial.

A quick "tell" pointed out.

 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hey thanks for the advice, could that not be a moisture pimple on an otherwise evenly spaced dial?
 
Posts
3,995
Likes
8,661
Hey thanks for the advice, could that not be a moisture pimple on an otherwise evenly spaced dial?

If it is, where is the corresponding discoloration or damage?

For my info: this was radium dial originally? Edit: I have a strong suspicion it was so I'm guessing that it was. If this dial has been scrubbed of radium and moisture damage, and that's what it looks like, I would also suspect that it was touched up, and it sure looks like it to me.
Edited:
 
Posts
24,658
Likes
54,773
Please post undistorted high resolution images showing the dial straight on. Or study the comparisons as posted here, and also look for others on the web. Focus on the details/fine-ness of the font, the alignment of the text and markers, etc.

Hey thanks for the advice, could that not be a moisture pimple on an otherwise evenly spaced dial?
Moisture generally causes discoloration and I'm not sure how that is connected to "evenly spaced." I am noticing some very obvious problems with alignment (SHOCK-RESISTING appears to be dramatically off-center), but I hesitate to draw conclusions because of the distortion in the image, which is completely skewed.
Edited:
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
So appreciate the attention to detail, attaching better reference images. Wondering whether this is worth purchasing for a close friend? Do we believe the dial has been refinished?

 
Posts
4,417
Likes
10,620
Depends. It's an attractive watch. I'm convinced it has been refinished. I saw nice originals going for $700-900. If you friend is a connoisseur and a stickler for details, I would say no. If it's $500 and he likes cools watches, then this is it.
Remember this is a manual wind watch with a screw-down crown so if it's a daily wearer, the crown will be the first to go...
 
Posts
24,658
Likes
54,773
I am wondering how this ended up in the Modern Omega forum. 🤪
 
Posts
2,279
Likes
2,481
there are quite a few suspect minute markers as well, looks like a redial to me too.
 
Posts
1,503
Likes
6,569
For me, the giveaway is the relative position of Oyster Royal to Tudor. It just doesn’t exactly line up like originals. And in that case a suspiciously clean dial like this one is easily condemned to redial status.
 
Posts
3,168
Likes
9,467
So appreciate the attention to detail, attaching better reference images. Wondering whether this is worth purchasing for a close friend? Do we believe the dial has been refinished?

Tudors are like porno mags, you only buy them for a "friend"? 😉😉😉
 
Posts
13,778
Likes
53,743
If it is, where is the corresponding discoloration or damage?

For my info: this was radium dial originally? Edit: I have a strong suspicion it was so I'm guessing that it was. If this dial has been scrubbed of radium and moisture damage, and that's what it looks like, I would also suspect that it was touched up, and it sure looks like it to me.
+1 Washed and retouched.
 
Posts
2,279
Likes
2,481
Legitimacy post in the Modern Omega Watches section. Not legit 😁
Doh! Guess that sound WAS the joke going over my head!
 
Posts
69
Likes
114
Doh! Guess that sound WAS the joke going over my head!
It was a bad joke, I guess I’m just not sure why there’s a Tudor here.
 
Posts
3,995
Likes
8,661
It was a bad joke, I guess I’m just not sure why there’s a Tudor here.

I suspect that the poster knew he would get some knowledgeable responses regardless of where he posted...