Tough question.... the one that got away!

Posts
16,307
Likes
44,937
Like you, I have to wear it to know, and price or brand doesn't matter- if I don't love it, then I don't love it. I have had a few coveted and "expensive" watches that I just didn't enjoy wearing for one reason or another but felt no need to keep them-if you don't wear it, it's just a dust catcher. One of my favorite regular wears is my Benrus military re-issue from 1995 (50th anniversary of D-Day). It is only worth about $150, but it's incredibly comfortable, well built, easy to read and I don't care what happens to it.

If you want smaller vintage sport Omegas, that wear like your Seiko, look towards the late 60's Seamaster 120, the Seamaster Cosmic's, the Admirality Geneve, the C-cased Constellations or any of the Tissot PR516 or T12 lines (I know not technically Omega but the same family).
For your birthyear- anything from Rolex or Tudor would be fab. The Tudor Prince's of that era are a bargain.
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
This is tricky. Especially with social media, forums, etc., we can get influenced. The best way is trying them on, although not always easy when it's something vintage and/or rare.

I'm a novice collector myself, and I have sold some watches because they didn't speak to me, or your taste changes, or like @gostang9 mentions, you tend to find more expensive pieces that start to attract you. I went through a period where I bought too much, too fast. Now I'm trying to focus on thing that I absolutely love, from the appearance to the history. But in the process, this means making more room (so difficult to part with them!!)

Good luck and part of the fun is discovering. Important thing is not to make too many expensive mistakes 😉

the story is what keeps bringing me to purchase like the original seiko factories in Japan or the Sinn back story. What is the Omega story I should investigate? because of this the vintage market is what tends to call my name.
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
Like you, I have to wear it to know, and price or brand doesn't matter- if I don't love it, then I don't love it. I have had a few coveted and "expensive" watches that I just didn't enjoy wearing for one reason or another but felt no need to keep them-if you don't wear it, it's just a dust catcher. One of my favorite regular wears is my Benrus military re-issue from 1995 (50th anniversary of D-Day). It is only worth about $150, but it's incredibly comfortable, well built, easy to read and I don't care what happens to it.

If you want smaller vintage sport Omegas, that wear like your Seiko, look towards the late 60's Seamaster 120, the Seamaster Cosmic's, the Admirality Geneve, the C-cased Constellations or any of the Tissot PR516 or T12 lines (I know not technically Omega but the same family).
For your birthyear- anything from Rolex or Tudor would be fab. The Tudor Prince's of that era are a bargain.

wow great response thank you ... this will take time to research ! lol

The omega's all sound great and will look into them... The vintage tudor might be interesting but although I like the vintage rolex story and look I don't like their current approach to limiting the supply and only selling to high rollers so I have a fundamental problem with the brand now. tudor being affiliated with Rolex kind of spoils it for me... BUT I waffle on the above statement because Rolex is just so cool. I would love a silver vintage president... or an original explorer... lol with my lottery winnings!
 
Posts
1,023
Likes
1,018
what is your favourite watch currently and why? mine is my seiko 6139 because it has the original bracelet

If no omegas have jumped out at you yet, take a look at the speedmaster mkii. The case is similar to a seiko 6139 (mkii doesnt have end link cutouts though) Honestly the mkii was never on my radar cause the look just wasn't for me until I seen one in person and I was very wrong with my judgment of it in pictures.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,937
wow great response thank you ... this will take time to research ! lol

The omega's all sound great and will look into them... The vintage tudor might be interesting but although I like the vintage rolex story and look I don't like their current approach to limiting the supply and only selling to high rollers so I have a fundamental problem with the brand now. tudor being affiliated with Rolex kind of spoils it for me... BUT I waffle on the above statement because Rolex is just so cool. I would love a silver vintage president... or an original explorer... lol with my lottery winnings!
The Rolex of then is not the Rolex of now. I still crank up Micheal Jackson’s “Can’t Stop” in the car when it comes on the radio... despite the fact that the song may have other meanings in hindsight 😗

I have been vocal in the Rolex hater threads...I own 3 older Rolexes.
 
Posts
75
Likes
255
I have only sold modern (relatively new) watches. I have 17 vintage watches and would never consider selling any of them. I am careful when I make a purchase, and generally my watches are in exceptional condition. Selling one of these watches most likely means I'll never have another one. NOS watches, or close to it, aren't common. It takes years of paying attention in order to snag those special watches. Selling would certainly be followed with regret. No regrets so far.
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
If no omegas have jumped out at you yet, take a look at the speedmaster mkii. The case is similar to a seiko 6139 (mkii doesnt have end link cutouts though) Honestly the mkii was never on my radar cause the look just wasn't for me until I seen one in person and I was very wrong with my judgment of it in pictures.
The MKII doesn't jump off the page with the off case configuration but seeing it in person can be totally different. is it a thick watch? Reason I ask is I loved the idea of the MK40 but found it proportionally thick (14mm) at 38 mm wide. the same with many 3 subdial chrono's that is why I like the 6139 as it is still thin. I will try to find a MKII
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
I have only sold modern (relatively new) watches. I have 17 vintage watches and would never consider selling any of them. I am careful when I make a purchase, and generally my watches are in exceptional condition. Selling one of these watches most likely means I'll never have another one. NOS watches, or close to it, aren't common. It takes years of paying attention in order to snag those special watches. Selling would certainly be followed with regret. No regrets so far.
NOS vintage scares me because you don't want to make it old old stock with one bump on the wrist.... lol not to say I wouldn't but I didn't by a NOS GS from 69 for that reason... too perfect and pricey

Dave what is a good example of a watch in your collection that speaks to you and why?
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,937
damn it!!!! I might need to reconsider my Tudor stance... nice watch and in beautiful condition at an incredible price... back to my research ... lol
It’s actually been pretty heavily polished/rebrushed (albeit I think fairly well) and is overpriced by about 1/3 imo, but is an example of a nice daily wear from a respected brand of it can be had at the right price.

Everyone has different goals for their collections- some collect specific brands, styles, or periods. Some collect NOS examples, some want wabi-sabi galore. One man’s trash is literally another’s treasure. I think as we collect, our tastes and proclivities evolve- just as someone who gets into wine, craft beers or small batch distilled- your palette evolves.

I think if you were to ask every member here what they look for when collecting, every single one would give you a different answer- but I think a unanimous answer would be originality and condition. I don’t mind a little wear, I don’t care if it’s been lightly polished in its life as I intend to wear my watches regularly, not keep them in a showcase. But redialed watches or aftermarket parts (aside of period correct bracelets) are a no-go for me.
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
It’s actually been pretty heavily polished/rebrushed (albeit I think fairly well) and is overpriced by about 1/3 imo, but is an example of a nice daily wear from a respected brand of it can be had at the right price.

Everyone has different goals for their collections- some collect specific brands, styles, or periods. Some collect NOS examples, some want wabi-sabi galore. One man’s trash is literally another’s treasure. I think as we collect, our tastes and proclivities evolve- just as someone who gets into wine, craft beers or small batch distilled- your palette evolves.

I think if you were to ask every member here what they look for when collecting, every single one would give you a different answer- but I think a unanimous answer would be originality and condition. I don’t mind a little wear, I don’t care if it’s been lightly polished in its life as I intend to wear my watches regularly, not keep them in a showcase. But redialed watches or aftermarket parts (aside of period correct bracelets) are a no-go for me.
Great post and I agree that asking for peoples reasons for loving a watch is of interest to me for sure.... what appeals to the eye is fascinating. For instance I'm not a flashy guy, dress very conservative but a little pop of colour or originality on my watch is great, a dark dial with red hands or the sharp edges of a vintage king seiko or the stark contrast of a black dial with stark white indices of my Sinn are all enjoyable to me.

thank you again for your comments... great conversation
 
Posts
21,736
Likes
49,332
And what is it about the higher end watches that hold your attention longer? Modern size, finish, complications, prestige? I don't own anything in this price range so I can't guess what would do it for me and therefore can't pick the right one to start with.

It's funny I haven't found anything from $2-4 k that has jumped out at me. The mid range doesn't seem to have the value proposition or the magnetic draw of the luxury $5-10k pieces I have considered. do you find the same thing or am I missing something?

I would probably turn it around. Im not drawn to watches because they’re more expensive, I’m just increasingly interested in less common watches, watches with special history/features, or watches in particularly good condition. These are not usually inexpensive. When you hunt for a long time to find an uncommon watch in good condition you’re naturally going to be reluctant to let it go.
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
I would probably turn it around. Im not drawn to watches because they’re more expensive, I’m just increasingly interested in less common watches, watches with special history/features, or watches in particularly good condition. These are not usually inexpensive. When you hunt for a long time to find an uncommon watch in good condition you’re naturally going to be reluctant to let it go.
Well said...
 
Posts
47
Likes
37
Like you, I have to wear it to know, and price or brand doesn't matter- if I don't love it, then I don't love it. I have had a few coveted and "expensive" watches that I just didn't enjoy wearing for one reason or another but felt no need to keep them-if you don't wear it, it's just a dust catcher. One of my favorite regular wears is my Benrus military re-issue from 1995 (50th anniversary of D-Day). It is only worth about $150, but it's incredibly comfortable, well built, easy to read and I don't care what happens to it.

If you want smaller vintage sport Omegas, that wear like your Seiko, look towards the late 60's Seamaster 120, the Seamaster Cosmic's, the Admirality Geneve, the C-cased Constellations or any of the Tissot PR516 or T12 lines (I know not technically Omega but the same family).
For your birthyear- anything from Rolex or Tudor would be fab. The Tudor Prince's of that era are a bargain.

The Admiralty is stunning but seems to very rare and would to fight off others on this forum to get my hands on one! lol

I also really like the Seamaster 120's wow are they beautiful especially this one with the rare maybe mod dial

https://www.chrono24.ca/omega/seamaster-120-ref-166027-cal-565-broad-arrow-dial-rare--id11457493.htm
 
Posts
33
Likes
49
Others have said it, just get what u like and wear them. Collecting over the years, I tend to gravitate towards certain watches more than others. I love divers. I too would love a birth year. 77’ as well. Maybe one day I’ll get one. Maybe I won’t.
Also selling a bunch of watches, there’s always the one that got away. Or damn, I wish I kept that one. But I guess that also helps u become a better collector. Or home down what u really like.