ConElPueblo
·Being a member of the “lightweight class”, I was also very disappointed to learn that the ICO removed this class from the Olympic rowing program. 😒
Well, a Danish team managed to win bronze, very happy for them! 😀
Edited:
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Being a member of the “lightweight class”, I was also very disappointed to learn that the ICO removed this class from the Olympic rowing program. 😒
Well Canada has 11 medals so far, and all of them have been won by women. Hopefully the men step up soon!
This comment also leads me to ask a general question on how to rank countries based on tally of number of medals.
I am of the opinion of ranking countries by number of gold medals first and foremost, then, by number of silver (especially if there is a tie on number of gold medals), and so on.
I know that others look simply at the total number of medals to rank countries.
What are your thoughts on this one!?
I favor a points system for tallying...3 for gold, 2 for silver, 1 for bronze.
Having said that, I find the Olympics medals table and the jingoism that goes along with it a little tiresome. There, I said it. I enjoy watching the Olympics (although not so much this year) but I enjoy it for the amazing athleticism and skill...I don't much care about the nationality of the athletes demonstrating it.
This comment also leads me to ask a general question on how to rank countries based on tally of number of medals.
I am of the opinion of ranking countries by number of gold medals first and foremost, then, by number of silver (especially if there is a tie on number of gold medals), and so on.
I know that others look simply at the total number of medals to rank countries.
What are your thoughts on this one!?
This comment also leads me to ask a general question on how to rank countries based on tally of number of medals.
I am of the opinion of ranking countries by number of gold medals first and foremost, then, by number of silver (especially if there is a tie on number of gold medals), and so on.
I know that others look simply at the total number of medals to rank countries.
What are your thoughts on this one!?
Does MotoGP use remote sensors, with nothing attached to the athletes?
Of course anyone who wears a Fitbit has that technology, so clearly it isn't new if it's a worn device.
I sent Crispin a message to confirm with him that he’s not wearing a heart rate monitor for the information that is being broadcast, so this is being done remotely. I had read that this was done by the use of sensors on the exposed skin. If they are able to do this with riders in full leathers and helmets, I would be interested to understand that technology if you have details...
Archery is leading some Olympic innovation at these Games. It's the first sport to have live data on athlete physiology as they compete. In the lower left of the screen you can see the heart rate of the archer as they are shooting
They apparently do this with remote sensors focused on the skin
I expect we'll see more of this sort of thing in future Olympics




