Thoughts on the new Vacheron 222 in steel?

Posts
1,225
Likes
6,285
"Vacheron Constantin now has a Historiques 222 in steel. It has the same great dimensions (37mm by 7.95mm), the same movement, and the same vintage touches, now in more casual and affordable stainless steel, for $32,000. And yes, it’s awesome."

Thoughts? I think it looks fantastic. Maybe we're generally towards the end of the integrated bracelet watch craze though (at least grey market prices are dropping massively). Love the colour they've gone with on the dial.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/introducing-vacheron-constantin-222-steel



The Movement

Caliber:
Caliber 2455/2
Functions: Hours, minutes, date
Diameter: 26.2mm
Thickness: 3.6mm
Power Reserve: 40 hours of power reserve
Winding: Automatic
Frequency: 28,800 vibrations per hour
Jewels: 27
Chronometer Certified: No
Additional Details: Hallmark of Geneva certified timepiece



Pricing & Availability

Price: $32,000
Availability: Immediately
Limited Edition: No, but exclusive to Vacheron Constantin boutiques.


 
Posts
3,166
Likes
8,300
To me, it looks like a Rolex Oyster Perpetual with a nice bracelet and date window at 5 times the price.
 
Posts
169
Likes
156
Incredibly expensive. And it just misses something that the gold version has
 
Posts
7,757
Likes
26,957
$35k? I rather buy a summer house.

Seriously, though, I was never an AP Royal Oak fan, even setting cost aside, and let's face it, the 222 was essentially a copy, albeit high-class.

As for this particular example, I would not want a date function, and have never been a fan of integrated bracelets. The movement, while presumably of very good quality, is not to my taste, aesthetically. I wouldn't want the model reference stamped on a 22k gold rotor, nor do I like the too-cute-by-half scalloping, designed to mimic the (unattractive, in my view) bezel.
 
Posts
7,059
Likes
13,166
It's in line with the pricing of the day for these uber sports watches, it will also be unobtainable for the average Joe. It does not have the original, ultra thin movement that the Royal Oak, Nautilus and VC 222 used. It's nice, but not compelling. VC is a lost brand, kind of like Breguet, it doesn't know where it wants to go.
Edited:
 
Posts
13,147
Likes
52,240
Overdone and overpriced.
 
Posts
229
Likes
738
I think it is a really nice watch. I might pay $5k for it. The reality is that new watches just simply price themselves out of everywhere except the absolutely brand new watch market, where they sure make some money.
 
Posts
1,225
Likes
6,285
It's in line with the pricing of the day for these uber sports watches, it will also be unobtainable for the average Joe. It does not have the original, ultra thin movement that the Royal Oak, Nautilus and VC 222 used. It's nice, but not compelling. VC is a lost brand, kind of like Breguet, it doesn't know where it wants to go.
Yeah interesting take, I think I recall reading in a few places that Vacheron had had a very good growth in the past few years, at least financially.

https://revolutionwatch.com/vacheron-constantin-morgan-stanley-luxe-consult-billionaire/

Agree that somehow even though it's the exact same watch, I really quite like the yellow gold model, but the steel is nice yet not stunning. Agreed that breguet seems a bit vague. I'd suggest there are a lot of brands far more lost than vacheron at least... AP have turned themselves into a 1-trick pony, even Omega I think massively cheapens their brand by having a million and one limited editions of all their most popular watches, plus some kinda average watches on the cheap end, I mean Omega is always going to play second fiddle to Rolex with this approach (which seems to be where they're happy to I guess). Where are ulysses nardin, blancpain, glashutte original going as brands? I'm not a huge fan of them but Breitling and Tag Heuer seem to at least have fairly compelling brand vision and direction!
 
Posts
1,084
Likes
2,048
VC is a lost brand, kind of like Breguet, it doesn't know where it wants to go.
Exactly that !