Been searching on and off for a straight lug speedmaster and have used this thread as a reference on the cases but I thought this video from Omega was pretty interesting. Honestly, don't think it settles the debate but thought was a useful piece of information in case others hadn't seen it.
ETA - Go to 4:25 point to see discussion of what Omega currently thinks how straight were produced originally.
105.003-64 lugs look nothing like this. Anybody have a -63 they can add?
Fairly sure it's only the 105.003-65 that had bevels. All other straight lug Speedmasters did not have distinct bevels. The -65 was also a one (sub) reference only case maker.
Good find!
I think that reinforces that the -64 had no bevel originally, but it is ambiguous since he namechecks the FOIS (which is based AFAIK on a late iteration 2998) while he is discussing it. I do not believe at all that every straight lug had no bevel. If that is what he is saying, then I think he is plain wrong, and admitting that Omega got the FOIS horribly wrong, but if he was saying that the new EW has no facet since the original -64 had none, then that sounds perfectly reasonable.
Been searching on and off for a straight lug speedmaster and have used this thread as a reference on the cases but I thought this video from Omega was pretty interesting. Honestly, don't think it settles the debate but thought was a useful piece of information in case others hadn't seen it.
ETA - Go to 4:25 point to see discussion of what Omega currently thinks on how straight lugs were produced originally.
Interesting that they claim the facets were added during service, I suppose polishing out a ding on one lug would make it look asymmterical so they did all four...
Surely that could be the only reason to do this work. If this was done regularly there would be far more examples of " applied" facets. I doubt if this happened as a matter of course.
More light needs to be thrown on this issue.