wagudc
·I wonder what the thought process of geometry is, discovered or invented? Are we inventing the relationship between the radius, circumference, and area via π? Was π invented to make these have a relationship, or did we discover that π makes these things relate?
In my view a circle is an invented human construct. Mathematically a circle is a set of points equidistant from a single point. A point is a location with no length, width, or depth. So first off a point is artificial. Nothing has no length, width, or depth. Then nowhere will you find an exact circle in nature. You can find things very close to circles, but nothing will be exactly circular to infinite precision. On a side note, is infinite precision even possible? Is the real world continuous or discrete at some smallest scale? Physicists don't have an answer to that question yet.
Of course geometry is hugely important and very valuable for understanding the real world. But in my view it is a human construct used to understand the real world. When you first describe a set of definitions and axioms there are a bunch of logical results of those axioms that you may not know at the onset. One has to discover those results. one of these results is that the ration of the circumference to the diameter is the same for any circle, i.e. π. We didn't invent π, we invented the circle.
I am not a math historian, but I am pretty sure humans from different parts of the world have come up with the same same set of basic definitions and axioms of geometry, and independently found the same results. In my view that doesn't mean that geometry is reality, it just means that it is a very natural way to describe reality. I also believe other intelligent beings living in our universe could make the same sort of assumptions and then discover the same results, so in that sense it is not uniquely human if intelligent life does or has existed elsewhere in the universe.

