- Posts
- 859
- Likes
- 3,448
qazwsx1
·Dear Members,😀
Today, I am pleased to share another notable piece from my collection — the Omega Constellation reference 168.0065, housing the caliber 1011 movement.
This particular model was produced exclusively for the Japanese market. Notably, in this reference, the Constellation star is absent from the dial.
This reference has been extensively reviewed by experts, as shown in the following sources:
https://omega-constellation-collect...last-omega-constellation-piepan-left.html?m=1
https://stories.omegaforums.net/japanese-constellation-168-0065-piepan/
A fine example was also offered for sale by @nanjingcigaretes in December 2023: https://omegaforums.net/threads/197...al-1011-with-omega-mesh-bracelet-1800.166552/
Let us begin with an overview of the watch itself.😀
Firstly, the Omega emblem remains applied but is now separated — the symbol is preserved in its traditional upper position, while the word “OMEGA” has been repositioned toward the lower half of the dial. The text layout has also been revised, with “Constellation” now appearing at the top, followed by “Automatic,” and “Chronometer Officially Certified” relocated to the bottom.
Additional Images in Natural Lighting.
In my assessment, the case appears sharp and likely unpolished. Similarly, the case back shows no signs of polishing.
The current plexiglass, bearing the Omega logo, appears to be original.
The movement number is located in an unusual position when compared to other models, such as those with dog-leg lugs. According to Desmond’s article, a similar reference with a movement number of 37,281,000 was produced on May 28, 1975, and shipped to Japan. Given that my watch’s movement number is only approximately 20,000 units higher, it is reasonable to estimate that it was manufactured in June to July 1975.
It is worth noting that the correct and original crown for this special reference is not the thin decagonal style commonly seen on dog-leg lug models.
I have included close-up images of the crown for future reference.
More Close-Up Dial Photographs:😉
From certain angles, the dial reveals an elevated border characteristic of the pie pan design.
It is fortunate that this 50-year-old timepiece shows no signs of dial spotting — a condition frequently observed in tropical regions such as those in Asia. Please also note the pronounced “starburst effect” on the silver-tone dial.
Finally my wrist shot:
I have included a wrist shot, along with a comparison to another piece in my collection — a dog-leg lug model featuring the final pie pan dial with arrowhead markers versus this uncommon last reference of the pie pan in the same lug style.
I sincerely appreciate the advice and insights received via private messages from members of Omega Forums — your input has been invaluable.
Thank you all for your feedback, comments, and support. 😊👍
Warm regards,
Teerapat
Today, I am pleased to share another notable piece from my collection — the Omega Constellation reference 168.0065, housing the caliber 1011 movement.
This particular model was produced exclusively for the Japanese market. Notably, in this reference, the Constellation star is absent from the dial.
This reference has been extensively reviewed by experts, as shown in the following sources:
https://omega-constellation-collect...last-omega-constellation-piepan-left.html?m=1
https://stories.omegaforums.net/japanese-constellation-168-0065-piepan/
A fine example was also offered for sale by @nanjingcigaretes in December 2023: https://omegaforums.net/threads/197...al-1011-with-omega-mesh-bracelet-1800.166552/
Let us begin with an overview of the watch itself.😀
Firstly, the Omega emblem remains applied but is now separated — the symbol is preserved in its traditional upper position, while the word “OMEGA” has been repositioned toward the lower half of the dial. The text layout has also been revised, with “Constellation” now appearing at the top, followed by “Automatic,” and “Chronometer Officially Certified” relocated to the bottom.
Additional Images in Natural Lighting.
In my assessment, the case appears sharp and likely unpolished. Similarly, the case back shows no signs of polishing.
The current plexiglass, bearing the Omega logo, appears to be original.
The movement number is located in an unusual position when compared to other models, such as those with dog-leg lugs. According to Desmond’s article, a similar reference with a movement number of 37,281,000 was produced on May 28, 1975, and shipped to Japan. Given that my watch’s movement number is only approximately 20,000 units higher, it is reasonable to estimate that it was manufactured in June to July 1975.
It is worth noting that the correct and original crown for this special reference is not the thin decagonal style commonly seen on dog-leg lug models.
I have included close-up images of the crown for future reference.
More Close-Up Dial Photographs:😉
From certain angles, the dial reveals an elevated border characteristic of the pie pan design.
It is fortunate that this 50-year-old timepiece shows no signs of dial spotting — a condition frequently observed in tropical regions such as those in Asia. Please also note the pronounced “starburst effect” on the silver-tone dial.
Finally my wrist shot:
I have included a wrist shot, along with a comparison to another piece in my collection — a dog-leg lug model featuring the final pie pan dial with arrowhead markers versus this uncommon last reference of the pie pan in the same lug style.
I sincerely appreciate the advice and insights received via private messages from members of Omega Forums — your input has been invaluable.
Thank you all for your feedback, comments, and support. 😊👍
Warm regards,
Teerapat
Edited:
