Support independent Watchmakers!

Posts
14,565
Likes
42,115
Fortunately, over all the years I have serviced quartz watches, when I have replaced a Swiss movement of any maker, I have rarely turfed the old one. I see the future supply problems for replacement movements and/or parts will simply mean I will be servicing rather than replacing a lot of these Swatch (group brand) movements, and relying on my sizeable bank of "spares" banked over all the years. A bit of a nuisance, but after 60 + years in this business, I don't think I will have to worry about this for too much longer!
 
Posts
27,946
Likes
71,206
Sometimes we have to invest money and re educate just to survive. Life in the last 20 years has become more demanding whatever you do.

Continuing education is a must in my view. I have certainly seen the contrary attitude with some watchmakers, but personally I find it puzzling. The technology of the watches themselves, and the technology used to service and repair them is always advancing. Just looking at the thread I made on quartz watches will show that very clearly. I have been to courses where other watchmakers present had no idea how to use epilame for example...

Out of interest, I'm not sure where the £40k extra tools comes from but from what Al says above and a post I read elsewhere, this seems to be more like £5k for a shop with all the usual tools. Surely for Watchmakers who still want to service Swatch watches, it would make sense to do this? You could amortize this over a year by just increasing the typical service cost by £10? Possibly less, as I suspect direct prices are less from Omega than Cousins (A PZ5000 crystal is US$50 from Cousins as an example but probably $30 direct?).

I realise this doesn't solve the problem for everyone (not me or any other amateur) but it does for some. Or did someone cost this out and it really is £40k as that is a huge investment? Does that number include additional Group specific training? I appreciate it could be more if you're doing specific training for coaxials (for example) or if you need more kit for those.

Just interested to see what a real figure might be.

Regards, Chris

You can get a quartz tester for maybe $1500, and the high pressure wet tester is about $5000. For me it's about having a modern and well equipped shop that allows me to be more efficient in my work and to serve my customers better. I won't say that having the account is secondary, but I would have this equipment even if I didn't need it for the account - I look at it as an investment rather than an expense.

I can't say how the training works in every country, but for example the co-axial training was free - all I had to do was get myself to NJ and pay for the hotel for a week. They picked us up each morning, dropped us off each night, and fed us lunch each day. I had to buy myself breakfast and dinner. At the end we were given tools (3 different movement holders) that were worth over $1000 to take with us for servicing co-axial watches. In addition to learning the co-axial specifically, we were shown refinishing techniques and other things in servicing that save me time on every watch I service.

I honestly think a lot of the push back I've seen to getting ready for an account is either related to lacking real knowledge of what is required, or some sense of fear of being judged unworthy. Add in the indignant group that feels like no one should be able to judge their skills, and this accounts for a lot of those who refuse to even look into the process in detail.

Most watchmakers work in isolation and are only judged by their customers, which quite frankly doesn't tell the whole story about how well a watch has been serviced ( running and keeping good time doesn't tell you if the job was done right in every way). It's human nature to be nervous when you put yourself in front of the brand for them to judge your work, but in my experience in NJ at least, they are there to help you if you will let them.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
514
Likes
560
Most watchmakers work in isolation and are only judged by their customers, which quite frankly doesn't tell the whole story about how well a watch has been serviced ( running and keeping good time doesn't tell you if the job was done right in every way).

Never a truer word written!
 
Posts
306
Likes
523
I realise this doesn't solve the problem for everyone (not me or any other amateur) but it does for some. Or did someone cost this out and it really is £40k as that is a huge investment? Does that number include additional Group specific training? I appreciate it could be more if you're doing specific training for coaxials (for example) or if you need more kit for those.

Just interested to see what a real figure might be.

Regards, Chris

I have first hand knowledge that one manufacturers accredited/approved shops have been told that in order to maintain their approval they must "invest" another 20-30,000 Pounds in tooling/equipement. Many of these individuals are approaching the end of their careers and therefore are dropping the approval, they simply can't amortize the cost over the work/time remaining. So while this may not apply to Swatch, it does to others...
Edited:
 
Posts
306
Likes
523
Continuing education is a must in my view. I have been to courses where other watchmakers present had no idea how to use epilame for example...

In the aviation world (where I worked for 35 years) Continuing Education is mandatory and actually regulated, for pilots and engineers.

Watchmakers, in my experience, in general refuse to listen or participate in any sort of continuing education, which is a real shame...

I honestly think a lot of the push back I've seen to getting ready for an account is either related to lacking real knowledge of what is required, or some sense of fear of being judged unworthy. Add in the indignant group that feels like no one should be able to judge their skills, and this accounts for a lot of those who refuse to even look into the process in detail.

Most watchmakers work in isolation and are only judged by their customers, which quite frankly doesn't tell the whole story about how well a watch has been serviced ( running and keeping good time doesn't tell you if the job was done right in every way). It's human nature to be nervous when you put yourself in front of the brand for them to judge your work

Which is why there are more watchmakers that haven't subjected themselves to any professional accreditation than those who claim to be one. Since this is an unregulated trade in most countries (Switzerland excepted?) there is no incentive or requirement for anyone who wants to claim to be a watchmaker. And as you have probably witnessed many times, there is a lot of crappy botched work out there, which is a real black mark on the trade. With no regulation or standards to follow, it's a free for all, just look at all the terrible customer reviews on line for various outfits that offer watchmaking service.

In my case I wanted to know if I could meet a standard both for knowledge and practical skills, so I chose the British Horological Institute's Distance Learning Course.

I challenge anyone who is interested in watchmaking to attempt only one each of the written and practical DLC exams. The expectations and standards you have to meet to achieve a "Pass" mark, force you to work to another level of perfection that you would have a hard time achieving on your own. It's very difficult for most people to open yourself up to others and accept their critical review of your workmanship. Given my aviation background where you check your attitude at the hangar door, or risk killing someone, I had no problem with the process and took away more from the DLC than I could ever expect to achieve on my own. I would like to see all watchmakers achieve some type of professional recognition, and belong to one of the major organizations, we should police ourselves and stand together for many reasons, parts embargo notwithstanding.
 
Posts
12,742
Likes
17,250
I would like to see all watchmakers achieve some type of professional recognition, and belong to one of the major organizations, we should police ourselves and stand together for many reasons, parts embargo notwithstanding
It used to be that way, at least here in Florida. There is a local watchmaker that actually posts a copy of his state issued watchmaking license on his website.

http://mirowatchrepair.com/content/photos/cert3.jpg

I guess at that time the states regulated watchmakers the same way they regulate CPA's. They had to pass state tests, have required professional education at regular intervals, and pay a licensing fee.

With the advent of quartz watches in the 1980's, these rules faded away. They were replaced by non-profit certification organizations like AWCI and also by requirements of the watch companies that are being discussed here.

gatorcpa
 
Posts
27,946
Likes
71,206
It used to be that way, at least here in Florida. There is a local watchmaker that actually posts a copy of his state issued watchmaking license on his website.

http://mirowatchrepair.com/content/photos/cert3.jpg

I guess at that time the states regulated watchmakers the same way they regulate CPA's. They had to pass state tests, have required professional education at regular intervals, and pay a licensing fee.

With the advent of quartz watches in the 1980's, these rules faded away. They were replaced by non-profit certification organizations like AWCI and also by requirements of the watch companies that are being discussed here.

gatorcpa

It "faded away" because it was found to be unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court has determined that licensing occupations is valid when it is in the interest of public safety, but in cases where it is not then licensing would "unconstitutionally deprive one of his right to pursue a lawful vocation."

State licensing of watchmakers has been struck down in the courts several times, and as a result states have dropped this requirement.

Here In Ontario a watchmaker was a licensed trade at one time, just like an auto mechanic, plumber, or electrician, but it no longer is. I know a watchmaker locally who's bench is 6 inches deep in parts including dials mixed in getting all scratched up, he uses fake parts because he has no parts accounts (tired to sell me a fake Rolex once), and I would not trust him to change the springs bars on a bracelet, but he has his old trade license displayed prominently in his shop...

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,945
I challenge anyone who is interested in watchmaking to attempt only one each of the written and practical DLC exams.

I was not aware that you could do these exams at a distance I've looked at the two Distance Learning Courses (DLC) from the BHI, they appear to relate as follows to watches:

Technician grade course – aiming towards being a technician servicing quartz watches

Intermediate/Final grade course – aiming towards being a Watchmaker servicing mechanical watches for which interchangeable parts are available (high relevance to this discussion!)

As far as I can see, these prepare you for a series of exams to be either a Technician or a first level of Watchmaker (there is a further grade of Watchmaker higher than that mentioned above). You don’t have to do the exams so, the courses can be done just out of interest.

The first course is about €1000-1200 which may not too bad as you get proper tutoring support for it where I assume you can send the tutor your work and he will comment. The exact extent of that support is not clear but as it’s half the course cost, you would hope it would be sufficient.

Oddly, the second course is cheaper at about €600-800 but, you only get tutor feedback on technical aspects.

The biggest problem is finding out the details of the courses. Taking the first one, all I have been able to get is that the Technician grade DLC prepares the student for these exam modules which are likely the ones you mention (I really thought you had to do these in UK)

D1: Theory of clock and watch servicing
D2: Construction of clock components
D4: Servicing and correcting faults in a quartz watch

In order to be a BHI accredited Technician, you need to be examined for D1, D2 and D4 so I suppose it all dovetails. Do the DLC Technician course, pass these three exams and you are awarded something to say you’re a BHI approved Technician (service of quartz watches). Then you can move on to what I'm calling the first grade of Watchmaker by doing the second course and further exam modules.

Anyway, none of this actually explains what you will be doing on this course (this really is just about all the data available except for the picture below which gives some very brief details of the modules) and for me, I don’t usually invest €1000+ based on so little information. That’s one thing that holds me back, the other being that for the second course, you don’t seem to get any feedback from the tutor on practical matters.

Even this picture below is unclear. For unit D2, will I be manufacturing from raw materials a clock train? I can’t believe it’s that and assume it’s just assembling something as the course that leads to that only needs "simple and inexpensive tools and machines".

I’m not being critical, Rob, but, they could make this a lot clearer if they want to get people to sign up. I know you’re involved with the BHI so, treat this as feedback. I do feel like I’m missing something here….

As an aside, I am adding "I would not trust him to change the springs bars on a bracelet" to my list of possible put downs. Thanks, Al.😉

Best regards, Chris

 
Posts
4,437
Likes
18,230
In most European countries there are still protected titles.
In order to title yourself an engineer, watchmaker of electrician you need to pass exams according to government set standards.
Lately this has been somewhat relaxed but to be a "master" of a given trade is still an honoured and protected title.

Having supervised technical work performed in the US I was, at the time, shocked to see the lack of professionalism from persons claiming to be electricians. We basically had to let them do their work (as required by state law and unions) and then redo the whole thing as soon as we had the vessel out in international waters.
When I later learned that any guy in the US (at lest in Virginia) with a box of tools and a helmet could claim to be an electrician it became just too clear what should be avoided in the future.

But again I have also had properly licensed guys do shitty work....
 
Posts
12,742
Likes
17,250
It "faded away" because it was found to be unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court has determined that licensing occupations is valid when it is in the interest of public safety, but in cases where it is not then licensing would "unconstitutionally deprive one of his right to pursue a lawful vocation."
I don't doubt for a second that you are correct.

However, I'm not sure where one draws the line between "the interest of public safety" and "unconstitutionally deprive one of his right to pursue a lawful vocation". As a CPA, I have to be licensed by the state. So do attorneys, cosmetologists and dozens of other professions which provide services to the general public, not all of which require college degrees. But that's why we pay the Supreme Court the big bucks.

I had always thought that the certification went away because it was costing the state a small fortune to administer the testing and continuing education at a time that the demand for watchmakers was at its lowest point.
gatorcpa

PS - Just found this interesting article, and it turns out we are both correct.
"We have also mentioned that the courts struck down most watchmaker licensing laws. Since the 1930s, however, few federal, state, or local economic laws or regulations have been struck down on substantive due process grounds"
 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,945
In most European countries there are still protected titles.
In order to title yourself an engineer, watchmaker of electrician you need to pass exams according to government set standards.
Not in UK, unfortunately, at least not for Engineers. I was at an event a few years ago and saw a guy in his dayglo jacket with something along the lines of "Movements Engineer" written in large letters on his back. His job was to direct people across the road.

I don't believe there is any protection on the use of Electrician or Watchmaker either in UK.

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
27,946
Likes
71,206
I don't doubt for a second that you are correct.

However, I'm not sure where one draws the line between "the interest of public safety" and "unconstitutionally deprive one of his right to pursue a lawful vocation". As a CPA, I have to be licensed by the state. So do attorneys, cosmetologists and dozens of other professions which provide services to the general public, not all of which require college degrees. But that's why we pay the Supreme Court the big bucks.

I had always thought that the certification went away because it was costing the state a small fortune to administer the testing and continuing education at a time that the demand for watchmakers was at its lowest point.
gatorcpa

PS - Just found this interesting article, and it turns out we are both correct.

I never meant to indicate you were completely wrong, only that the view being put forward was not complete. Yes of course the lack of watches to fix and decline of watchmaking has had an effect in more recent years, but as you've found these laws were being struck down well before the "quartz crisis."

And yes, your Supreme Court is the one making those distinctions, so if you are puzzled they are the people to ask, not me. 😀

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
4,437
Likes
18,230
Not in UK, unfortunately, at least not for Engineers. I was at an event a few years ago and saw a guy in his dayglo jacket with something along the lines of "Movements Engineer" written in large letters on his back. His job was to direct people across the road.

I don't believe there is any protection on the use of Electrician or Watchmaker either in UK.

Cheers, Chris
Movements Engineer? Perhaps something to print on some silly underwear😁!

There are exceptions over on this side of the North Sea as well. Engineer alone is not protected, but your degree & the word "Engineer" combined is.
 
Posts
27,946
Likes
71,206
But again I have also had properly licensed guys do shitty work....

And this is partly my point. Certification, while it may be a good thing generally, is a guarantee of exactly nothing when it comes to how well any work being done will be performed. Because you pass a test in a classroom doesn't mean you will work to that standard all the time.

In my former life I recall once having a rather heated conversation with an older structural engineer who was involved in a plant addition I was having constructed - he was using a code book from 1967, so his designs did not reflect how current structural codes were being used (Limit States Design). He was a P. Eng. (Professional Engineer, which is a protected title here in Ontario) but clearly the work he was doing was not up to current codes - we adopted LSD in our building codes in the mid-90's...

Often the certifying bodies are the cause of some problems, since rather than discipline their members when they have done something wrong, they see their role as protecting them so that the profession does not suffer when someone screws up. We have seen some of this behavior here in Canada.

Here for trades we have a bit of a hybrid system. If I want to run my own electrical wiring in my house (which I have done many times) I can do that, and I can call the electrical inspector in for rough and finished inspections, but I can't make any connections in the actual panel. I would need a licensed electrician for that, or at least that was the case the last time I checked as I haven't done any of this work for years. Same for natural gas piping - I can run the pipe but had to have a licensed gas fitter do the final connections again.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
5,427
Likes
9,285
Having supervised technical work performed in the US I was, at the time, shocked to see the lack of professionalism from persons claiming to be electricians. We basically had to let them do their work (as required by state law and unions) and then redo the whole thing as soon as we had the vessel out in international waters.
When I later learned that any guy in the US (at lest in Virginia) with a box of tools and a helmet could claim to be an electrician it became just too clear what should be avoided in the future.
Generally in the States the companies are licensed, but not individual workers. In areas where a trade is still largely union, there may be union designations for the level of the specific worker/ technician. If any electrical work was not up to code the licensed company who employed the electricians should have been on the hook to make things right. Of course this is based on the building trades; I'm not sure how the rules change for naval construction.
 
Posts
4,437
Likes
18,230
Generally in the States the companies are licensed, but not individual workers. In areas where a trade is still largely union, there may be union designations for the level of the specific worker/ technician. If any electrical work was not up to code the licensed company who employed the electricians should have been on the hook to make things right. Of course this is based on the building trades; I'm not sure how the rules change for naval construction.
The problem with vessels is that you do not want to hang around for the guys to come back and do their job right. Better get out to sea and make some money instead....
Our biggest problem at the time was that we had plenty of qualified electrical engineers onboard, but they was not allowed to perform any work as long as the vessel was in a US shipyard. They basically had to hang around and just make notes on what had to be redone later.
These kind of problems is one of the biggest contributors to why several of the major cruise line companies have now set up a complete ship yard on the Bahamas.
Sad but true.
 
Posts
4,437
Likes
18,230
And this is partly my point. Certification, while it may be a good thing generally, is a guarantee of exactly nothing when it comes to how well any work being done will be performed. Because you pass a test in a classroom doesn't mean you will work to that standard all the time.

In my former life I recall once having a rather heated conversation with an older structural engineer who was involved in a plant addition I was having constructed - he was using a code book from 1967, so his designs did not reflect how current structural codes were being used (Limit States Design). He was a P. Eng. (Professional Engineer, which is a protected title here in Ontario) but clearly the work he was doing was not up to current codes - we adopted LSD in our building codes in the mid-90's...

Often the certifying bodies are the cause of some problems, since rather than discipline their members when they have done something wrong, they see their role as protecting them so that the profession does not suffer when someone screws up. We have seen some of this behavior here in Canada.

Here for trades we have a bit of a hybrid system. If I want to run my own electrical wiring in my house (which I have done many times) I can do that, and I can call the electrical inspector in for rough and finished inspections, but I can't make any connections in the actual panel. I would need a licensed electrician for that, or at least that was the case the last time I checked as I haven't done any of this work for years. Same for natural gas piping - I can run the pipe but had to have a licensed gas fitter do the final connections again.

Cheers, Al
I am actually certified to approve installations and also run a company with installation guys working for me.
However I do not hold an installation license myself so I can not do the actual work. 🙁
 
Posts
27,946
Likes
71,206
I was not aware that you could do these exams at a distance I've looked at the two Distance Learning Courses (DLC) from the BHI, they appear to relate as follows to watches:

Technician grade course – aiming towards being a technician servicing quartz watches

Intermediate/Final grade course – aiming towards being a Watchmaker servicing mechanical watches for which interchangeable parts are available (high relevance to this discussion!)

Hi Chris,

I have no direct experience with the BHI courses, but coincidentally someone on WUS was asking about the courses, and the feedback was...less than stellar to put it mildly...

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f6/regarding-recently-updated-bhi-distance-learning-course-2503906.html

Again this is just one person's view, but you might want to keep an eye on this thread for further feedback from others.

You can also add "firmly stuck in the dark ages in attitude" to your list of potential insults. 😀

Cheers, Al