Porteroso
·Wow what a story. Glad you are getting it back.
Encouraging news.
But I'm curious as to how the watch was stolen to begin with. You never wore the watch, but it wasn't with the box and papers when stolen. 🤔
Encouraging news.
But I'm curious as to how the watch was stolen to begin with. You never wore the watch, but it wasn't with the box and papers when stolen. 🤔
Encouraging news.
But I'm curious as to how the watch was stolen to begin with. You never wore the watch, but it wasn't with the box and papers when stolen. 🤔
You think that most people keep watches with the original box and papers?
I don't. The boxes are stored somewhere out of my way, and I imagine that most people probably do the same thing probably, checking them away in a closet or in the garage, or basement.
Really?
This isn’t the first and won’t be the last watch stolen without the box and papers. @abrod520 I believe had his ST1 & ST2 stolen without the box and papers. I’ve seen threads on here where watches were stolen out of home safes without the box/papers. Shit happens.
and doesn’t their mandatory “authentication” process account for cross referencing serial numbers?
I'm not doubting his report. I just don't see how it happens. He had never worn the watch.
Cross referencing with what? The serial number had been purged from the NCIC database.
I addressed all this in an earlier post in this thread. Ebay "Authentication" for watches does not make any attempt to check for stolen items. the authenticator (Stoll & Co) compare the item received from the seller, to what was advertised in the Ebay auction, to determine if the watch is the same one that was listed, (e.g. not a Chinese clone if the ad said it was an authentic Swiss watch). NCIC doesn't apply here at all. I have asked Ebay to consider adding this as an additional step in their authentication process, but I think it entirely unlikely that will happen. In most states in the USA, pawn shops are required by law to check items they receive against the NCIC database, and if stolen, take possession of said items and turn them over to law enforcement. Seems reasonable to me, Ebay should be forced to do the same, otherwise it just becomes a channel for stolen goods.
I would like to add, Ebay hides behind several legal protections when it comes to the buying and selling of stolen goods on their platform. First, Ebay is shielded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives them immunity since they are neither buyer or seller and as long as they didn't know it was a stolen item. Second, they only have to remove a live auction if they are properly notified it is a stolen item, and there are hoops you have to jump through for that. Third, after a auction is complete and the item is sold, they don't even want you to contact them at all, they tell you go report it to law enforcement, its a criminal issue, once subpoenaed they will hand over information. As for Ebay providing reimbursements, that is not policy. They have a "Moneyback Guarantee" policy but that mostly covers when the seller doesn't ship your item, or what you got is grossly different than was was advertised. It specifically does not cover stolen goods, although if the anecdotal reports of some people getting Ebay reimbursement for stolen items is true, it would have been done using this policy as its the closest policy that applies.
Really?
This isn’t the first and won’t be the last watch stolen without the box and papers. @abrod520 I believe had his ST1 & ST2 stolen without the box and papers. I’ve seen threads on here where watches were stolen out of home safes without the box/papers. Shit happens.
All I can hope for is that spare LE kits - especially unique ones like the Speedy Tuesday and the Ultraman - aren't available from Omega and so my watches, whenever they should finally surface, are easy to identify.
Glad this one came back around though!
since he surrendered the property willingly (or would he have had to surrender it to the police?