speedy 38 mm?

Posts
41
Likes
53
So I seem to see semi-disparaging remarks about the 38 mm speedy on various forums. While I get that it is not the real deal in terms of the moon watch, some of us do have smaller wrists compared to most on this forum (6 inch exactly - not tiny for a lady, but tough to carry a 44.5 mm). I do intend to try some of the bigger speedys next boutique visit. But I want to balance having people admiring whatever watch I end up with against something that just screams "Hi, here I am with my enormous watch!"

And I will just say that I am all over the map with various constellations, ladymatics, and now dabbling in the speedy concept. I can't quite decide if I want to be sportier or dressier. The only good news in that is that it will slow me down on a purchase. I really am not ready or able to splurge on multiple omegas a this time.
 
Posts
5,340
Likes
9,072
If you want Style as well, forget Ladies watches. Italian women sport bigger watches like Rolex Subs. So, the Speedmaster is in that league. Good luck with your decision.
 
Posts
9,927
Likes
47,369
Have you been to a boutique? When I was in Boston they did have mechanical speedmasters with the same dial layout as the moon watch in 38.5mm. Tbh I can’t remember now if the said professional and had the moon thing on the back but they had a real nice brown dial one. Besides that there are the speedy dates automatics which make me happy when it comes to speedmasters but yes some people do look at them cross eyed I really don’t mind but I do appreciate the real moon watches.
 
Posts
419
Likes
2,132
Have you given vintage any thought? Many nice options in the 34-36mm range.

 
Posts
30,432
Likes
36,075
The Speedmaster reduced with the piggyback movement is the source of a lot of the disparagement, its not the only 38-39mm Speedy and is long gone in terms of Omega's current production, anything that isn't a reduced is actually pretty good indeed.
 
Posts
219
Likes
2,399
Hey,

I have a similar wrist size like yours.

I started with a Speedmaster Automatic (reduced) and really like it a lot. However, I would also like to have an additional Speedmaster Professional. I tried some older ones (thanks to @MtV) but also the new 3861 at OB. I will attach some pictures.

From 1986


-69


3861


3861 vs Reduced


Reduced


As you can see, the Professional appears not as huge on the wrist as one might think - although it is significantly larger than the reduced. What I like about the new 3861 is that it sits a little lower on the wrist.

There are also new 38mm Speedmasters with a co-axial movement available. These look a little dressier I would say but I did not try it myself:
https://www.omegawatches.com/de-de/...-chronometer-chronograph-38-mm-32430385001001

I hope that it gives you a first hint on the size differences.
 
Posts
1,476
Likes
2,828
Have you considered the Speedmaster FOIS (First Omega in Space)? Like you, I've got a slim wrist about 6in in diameter. I was also looking at the Speedmaster 38 and then came across the FOIS. I find that it wears a bit smaller than the Pro thanks to the 39.7mm diameter case and straight lugs, which just fits within the outer margins of my wrist. It came originally on a brown leather strap. Mine is on a Forstner flat link:
 
Posts
41
Likes
53
If you want Style as well, forget Ladies watches. Italian women sport bigger watches like Rolex Subs. So, the Speedmaster is in that league. Good luck with your decision.
I think many of the ladies watches have nice styles. But really, the issue for me is to not be too enormous on my wrist. I had tried on a couple of larger seamasters because I was checking those out for the husband. I liked what I saw (especially for him), but I did feel that those were just too huge. On the other hand, this dilemna is saving me a bundle for now!
 
Posts
41
Likes
53
Have you been to a boutique? When I was in Boston they did have mechanical speedmasters with the same dial layout as the moon watch in 38.5mm. Tbh I can’t remember now if the said professional and had the moon thing on the back but they had a real nice brown dial one. Besides that there are the speedy dates automatics which make me happy when it comes to speedmasters but yes some people do look at them cross eyed I really don’t mind but I do appreciate the real moon watches.
I have the good forune of living in a city with an actual omega boutique!
 
Posts
41
Likes
53
Have you given vintage any thought? Many nice options in the 34-36mm range.

VIntage looks like a whole new rabbit hole that I am not quite ready for! But I have seen some nice looking photos on these pages.
 
Posts
41
Likes
53
Have you considered the Speedmaster FOIS (First Omega in Space)? Like you, I've got a slim wrist about 6in in diameter. I was also looking at the Speedmaster 38 and then came across the FOIS. I find that it wears a bit smaller than the Pro thanks to the 39.7mm diameter case and straight lugs, which just fits within the outer margins of my wrist. It came originally on a brown leather strap. Mine is on a Forstner flat link:
Those do look good on the wrist! I have been wearing my captain cook whcih is a 37 or 38 - I am liking the size of it, though when I first bought it I thought it would be too big on me. I entered this new hobby thinking I needed less than 30 mm or so, but I have definitely changed that approach.

And those are some great looking watches!
 
Posts
41
Likes
53
The Speedmaster reduced with the piggyback movement is the source of a lot of the disparagement, its not the only 38-39mm Speedy and is long gone in terms of Omega's current production, anything that isn't a reduced is actually pretty good indeed.
Oh ok - yes, I saw the term reduced floating around a bit. I am just talking about the brand-spanking-new stuff.
 
Posts
41
Likes
53
Hey,

I have a similar wrist size like yours.

I started with a Speedmaster Automatic (reduced) and really like it a lot. However, I would also like to have an additional Speedmaster Professional. I tried some older ones (thanks to @MtV) but also the new 3861 at OB. I will attach some pictures.

From 1986


-69


3861


3861 vs Reduced


Reduced


As you can see, the Professional appears not as huge on the wrist as one might think - although it is significantly larger than the reduced. What I like about the new 3861 is that it sits a little lower on the wrist.

There are also new 38mm Speedmasters with a co-axial movement available. These look a little dressier I would say but I did not try it myself:
https://www.omegawatches.com/de-de/...-chronometer-chronograph-38-mm-32430385001001

I hope that it gives you a first hint on the size differences.
Nice looking!
 
Posts
198
Likes
194
Don’t listen to other people. One of favorite and most worn watches is my Speedy reduced that I got new in 1990. Picked it over the Speedy pro because of the size. Bought a Speedy Pro much later and now my son took over the Reduced. Still going strong, looking good and running extremely accurate. The people who dump on those or call the lady’s watches have no idea what they’re talking about. My next watch will likely be a 36mm Explorer.
The dinner plate style watch trend is over anyway.
And no, ladies should not be wearing men’s watches. My petite wife wears her 28mm watch and wouldn’t have it any other way.
 
Posts
88
Likes
234
You really just need to try on a watch instead of shopping for specific bezel size. For example, my MOTFM is bigger than my Submariner, but feels/wears/looks smaller.

A Nato, adding bulk actually gives even more of an illusion of being smaller.

I’ve gotten away with dismissing watches because of their size. You need to try it on.
 
Posts
21,200
Likes
48,321
My first Speedmaster was a reduced. I hated it as soon as I unpacked it, and not because of its size. I sold it immediately. I have not handled any of the newer small Speedmasters.

Fortunately, a Speedmaster is not the only chronograph. If I had a 6" wrist, I would also be looking at other brands, and probably focusing on thinner hand-winding chronographs, perhaps vintage. One or two mm of thickness can make a smaller watch look very unwieldy IMO.
 
Posts
1,476
Likes
2,828
OP, your thread just got me thinking of whether it's possible to have a chronograph of 36mm case diameter so I went online to have a look. I found this one for sale which might suit your needs:

https://www.carousell.com.my/p/omeg...l-861-chronograph-36mm-4840-51-01-1206808094/
It's a 145.00.00 so it's vintage. Having the manual wind Calibre 861 movement inside gives it a connection to the Moonwatch. Also means that servicing shouldn't be a problem.
 
Posts
149
Likes
192
N newfan
So I seem to see semi-disparaging remarks about the 38 mm speedy on various forums. While I get that it is not the real deal in terms of the moon watch, some of us do have smaller wrists compared to most on this forum (6 inch exactly - not tiny for a lady, but tough to carry a 44.5 mm). I do intend to try some of the bigger speedys next boutique visit. But I want to balance having people admiring whatever watch I end up with against something that just screams "Hi, here I am with my enormous watch!"

And I will just say that I am all over the map with various constellations, ladymatics, and now dabbling in the speedy concept. I can't quite decide if I want to be sportier or dressier. The only good news in that is that it will slow me down on a purchase. I really am not ready or able to splurge on multiple omegas a this time.
Focusing on bezel size & lug to lug measurements have thrown me off more times than I can count. Some have straight lugs, some have lyre lugs that appear smaller. Some cases are symmetrical & some are not. A black dial watch can look smaller than the same watch with a white dial. Bezel color and material can make a watch look bigger with more presence or make the dial look smaller.

Same for wrists. A watch will look different on a 6” round wrist vs. a 6 inch flat wrist. Try them all on and choose what you love. If you are going back and forth between sporty vs. dressy consider an Aqua Terra. It’s a very nice mix of both and is chosen by many because of that. Very versatile, it can do it all for a 1 watch owner. Good luck and enjoy the hunt!
 
Posts
236
Likes
257
6 inch wrist here, in fact in winter when it's cold it shrinks to 5.75 inches. I was convinced the speedy pro would be too big for me till I tried it on.

The speedy pro is not a true 42mm. The bezel is 40mm, and the lug to lug is 47mm, which is slightly smaller than the width of my wrist at 50mm.

Ultimately you should wear whatever makes you happy, and ignore people who think a watch is "too big". If you like it, that's all that matters.

 
Posts
38
Likes
39
I'm a guy with a 6.375" skinny wrist. Watch size is something I constantly battle when looking at new timepieces. While I can probably just barely pull off the modern 3861 Moonwatch, I chose to go semi-vintage with the Speedy Triple Date and am very pleased with the result. It's a more robust design than the Speedy Reduced and if you don't like a silver dial like mine, they made them with blue or black dials as well.