Speedmaster pre moon 105.012-66 CB wrong movement number

Posts
457
Likes
458
Hi td69,

That would be very interesting! Can you share a bit more on where you have seen this Extract? Do you have a picture of it, by any chance?

Unfortunately I do not have any photo of the Extract. The watch was offered for sale by a seller who claimed with certainty for such provenance.
 
Posts
13
Likes
0
Hi guys and speedies’addicted !
i’ve been caught by the speedie mania for few months now and after my hunt, I found what could be my first speedie, in a possible interesting vintage spécimen. The watch is presented as a 145.012-67, with a « not so bad » but original DON bezel, an AML step dial with close T and patina matching hands (drop second hand). UV shows an harmonious low lume, so not relumed dial IMO.
The caseback is unfortunetaly a service one 145.0012.
Caliber is a 321 24.591.xxx.
After I’ve readen several opinion from several tables, i am a bit confused.
Serial matches w/145.013 as well as 105.012.
Dial is definitely a 105.012 one and ni réa son to have been replaced.
Before asking OMEGA an EOA to valid the watch UD, whatsapp is your general opinion about this deal before a quite expensive decision ?
Thanks at all !
 
Posts
80
Likes
99
I know a collector who got the same reply as the OP for a Ref. 145.022-69 with serial 2960xxxx.
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,640
Hi guys and speedies’addicted !
i’ve been caught by the speedie mania for few months now and after my hunt, I found what could be my first speedie, in a possible interesting vintage spécimen. The watch is presented as a 145.012-67, with a « not so bad » but original DON bezel, an AML step dial with close T and patina matching hands (drop second hand). UV shows an harmonious low lume, so not relumed dial IMO.
The caseback is unfortunetaly a service one 145.0012.
Caliber is a 321 24.591.xxx.
After I’ve readen several opinion from several tables, i am a bit confused.
Serial matches w/145.013 as well as 105.012.
Dial is definitely a 105.012 one and ni réa son to have been replaced.
Before asking OMEGA an EOA to valid the watch UD, whatsapp is your general opinion about this deal before a quite expensive decision ?
Thanks at all !
24.591.XXX serial should be a mid/late 1967 105.012-66
 
Posts
1,482
Likes
9,291
Hi guys and speedies’addicted !
i’ve been caught by the speedie mania for few months now and after my hunt, I found what could be my first speedie, in a possible interesting vintage spécimen. The watch is presented as a 145.012-67, with a « not so bad » but original DON bezel, an AML step dial with close T and patina matching hands (drop second hand). UV shows an harmonious low lume, so not relumed dial IMO.
The caseback is unfortunetaly a service one 145.0012.
Caliber is a 321 24.591.xxx.
After I’ve readen several opinion from several tables, i am a bit confused.
Serial matches w/145.013 as well as 105.012.
Dial is definitely a 105.012 one and ni réa son to have been replaced.
Before asking OMEGA an EOA to valid the watch UD, whatsapp is your general opinion about this deal before a quite expensive decision ?
Thanks at all !

Think it needs a new thread.
The current title doesn't match IMHO...