Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I have seen a lot of -69s from 1970 : no one had this lume. I keep my question mark about that dial. 😒
Maybe I'm wrong but your Speedy looks a bit polished or worn.
The edges (highlighted with the red arrows) should be extremely sharp as shown in the second picture.
Sharp edges
Concerning the sides (yellow arrows), they should exhibit a brushed finishing that I can not see on yours (maybe because of the picture).
Brushed finishing.
Nevertheless, your 145.022-69 is a very nice one 👍
Why?
If replaced early because of a misprint or another issue, could absolutely be a replacement step dial.
And yes, it happens that a dial has to be replaced short after the sale, even nowadays, see SpeedyTuesday...
I think the lume is probably OK, would like to see macro shots of it if possible. Also try charging it under a bright light for a minute or so, then turn the lights off and take a photo? We can get a better idea about it from that.
I have tried the lume and "charge" it under direct light, then 100% darkness, very weak lume that fades away in a few seconds, so typically what should be normal on a vintage watch?
here is a close up
I thought it was common knowledge that dials of this era tend to turn a lightish green rather than the usual yellow on earlier tritium dials.
I thought it was common knowledge that dials of this era tend to turn a lightish green rather than the usual yellow on earlier tritium dials.