asrnj77
·Ras47 has a defense strategy that works for that home. No different than a machine gun belt loaded with a tracer every fifth round or a police shotgun running slugs with beanbags on the side saddle or a trained German Shepherd. Or a 90 year old with a .22 revolver because that is what he feels confident in. When I turn 90, I hope I can wield a 9mm effectively, but if it is a .22, then so be it and no steel frame .44 magnum is even in the cards.
Depending on the country, the laws will determine the option of baseball/cricket bat or firearm for home defense.
As an aside, I googled bear attacks and was surprised by the number of 9mm and other pistols being used in bear attacks with success by the pistol user. Success here being person not dying and/or bear dying or running off. Bullets were normally full metal jacket and not hollow points. Great read.
Well it kind of is different. For starters a tracer round will still kill you. Likewise with somebody carrying a .22 revolver. A smaller caliber round isn’t considered “less than lethal”. In practical terms it could potentially do less damage than a 9mm but its not like you’re shooting a neighborhood punk with rock salt. You would still be shooting somebody with a bullet. I’m also not familiar with any police officer that mixes less than lethal ammunition with live ammunition. That is a nightmare waiting to happen. That’s also why police officers carry tasers on their non-weapon side so that they don’t instinctively reach for their duty weapon when they intended to grab the taser.
To Ras47’s point I get the preference for less than lethal. I can’t imagine any intruder that is going to continue to enter your home after first hearing/seeing a 12 gauge and then getting shot with any sort of projectile (bean bag or not). My point was just that when you mix non-lethal and lethal together you can get unintended consequences.





