Show us your 2577 Omega Seamaster (and a little introduction to the reference)

Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
This is my first post here on OF, so be gentle!

I really appreciate this thread, it actually helped my a lot while researching my latest purchase. Thus, I thought I'd show my appreciation and share my beautiful 2577-12SC, Cal. 354, from with I believe to be 1952. Serial number is 13.9m.


Welcome aboard - great start 😀 Love the Breguet numerals, too. 13.9m serial points more to ca. 1954 imo, but that doesnt make this any less wearable or interesting, of course.
 
Posts
12
Likes
20
Thanks, @MtV, I've used a online serial number decoder, but I trust and welcome your expertise and will happily refer to it as a 1954 model. I believe I've read the entire thread and don't recall having found this: can you, or anybody else, tell me what the SC in the reference refers to?
 
Posts
2,041
Likes
25,203
At least in this extract, the date of manufacture of the movement and the date of delivery is indicated. When the watch was assembled, you can probably not say exactly...

 
Posts
9,733
Likes
54,422
New acquisition with a black honeycomb dial featuring a rail track and Breguet numerals. I put it on a black ostrich strap from Artisan. Currently with my watchmaker getting a tune up.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Good Lord are these black honeycomb dials hard to photograph! Put it on a black ostrich strap from Artisan. I think that it’s an attractive combination.

dibs
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Sorry, big guy, MtV beat you to it. 🙁

If I hadn't met him in person, I'd say I'd wrastle him for it lol
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
If I hadn't met him in person, I'd say I'd wrastle him for it lol

I dislocated my shoulder yesterday. Now is your time Erric! 😁
 
Posts
9,733
Likes
54,422
2577 two tone hobnail dial. Thanks again to MtV for pointing me to this one.
 
Posts
325
Likes
165
Well, don't know whether my last acquisition is entitled to be shown here : it is not a 2577, but a 2576, with Breguet Numerals...
and with what I believe to be a period correct original Omega bracelet.
A quick shot on the day I received it (including my cat...)
Ready for a thorough service as soon as my 168.005 Constellation is back.
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
Another example that certainly deserves a spot in this thread. @Bill Sohne and @kyle L will know this one:



There are a few points that make this 2577 special:

-it’s powered by the legendary cal. 352
-it’s a “plank” dial (the word Omega is on a raised badge)
-the positioning of the text, as well as the font size, is rather unusual
-that lovely blued second hand
-and last but not least: Would you look at the patina on this lovely 18k case. Never fails to make me smile when they come like this.
 
Posts
10,438
Likes
16,317
Beautiful watch certainly but it has me reaching for the polishing cloth! I’d want to X-ray that, 75% Au normally stays brighter, it’s unusual to see it like that. I wonder else is in the alloy.
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
Beautiful watch certainly but it has me reaching for the polishing cloth! I’d want to X-ray that, 75% Au normally stays brighter, it’s unusual to see it like that. I wonder else is in the alloy.

Mmh - surprised to hear that. I’ve held numerous examples with much darker discoloration, rainbow colors even.
 
Posts
10,438
Likes
16,317
Mmh - surprised to hear that. I’ve held numerous examples with much darker discoloration, rainbow colors even.
9K (only 37.5% gold of course), even 14K patinates fairly quickly but in my experience 18K stays pretty bright. That said, maybe that hasn't been touched in 70 years and the items I see have. It could well be the alloy make up, there is quite some variety seen in that remaining 25%, which is what makes me curious.
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
9K (only 37.5% gold of course), even 14K patinates fairly quickly but in my experience 18K stays pretty bright. That said, maybe that hasn't been touched in 70 years and the items I see have. It could well be the alloy make up, there is quite some variety seen in that remaining 25%, which is what makes me curious.

Ah, got you. I thought you meant that this might not be solid gold at all but could be a counterfeit, lead core case or something. Which I doubt. But I can have it tested, sure. Got another 2577 in 18k that also has a significantly darker color than my Connies in 18k from that time.
 
Posts
10,438
Likes
16,317
Ah, got you. I thought you meant that this might not be solid gold at all but could be a counterfeit, lead core case or something. Which I doubt. But I can have it tested, sure. Got another 2577 in 18k that also has a significantly darker color than my Connies in 18k from that time.
Oh don't bother on my account lol, just professional curiosity on my part. I don't doubt for a second it is legit 18K. If it says it is in the caseback, it is. I have a solid 18K fat lug myself, but its a later 2846 so off topic for this excellent thread.
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
Combine rose gold and a hobnail dial and I instantly feel a twitch in the trigger finger... Far from being a perfect example, but for the right price I figured I'll still enjoy it. Cal 354, late bubble back case. Just need to replace that hideous crown for a correct clover-style example.