If that really, really floats your boat then it's worth considering. I have a closely related 1342 movement Seamaster that I've owned from new which doesn't get enough wrist time. Omega Bienne can still sort out any movement problems -- at a cost.
But, A$1k? Hmmmm. I'd need it to be perfect and recently serviced for that. And I'd like to see Seamaster on the dial!
I am told that is has been recently serviced and the photos came back today after a visit from the watchmaker - this is on Chrono24. Going to the Omega Vintage Database Search and plugging in the numbers, Omega refers to it as a Seamaster.
Question for anyone, should I opt to spend more and simply avoid the early 1345 quartz movement?
I see no evidence that it's a Seamaster. And I do not recall seeing a caseback like that -- BICBW. I will have to hand you over to the '70s Constellation experts now, but of the watches you've presented the Connie is the one with with most expertise hereabouts.
Just one last question on the Connie. Lumed hands and dial -- where is the "T" for Tritrium?
To answer your original question: No.
Your alternative is getting better, but for au$1600 way overpriced. There are good c-cases around for much less, and I'd aim for the previous generation 168.017 or .027 (date only) with an original bracelet. With patience you should be able to pick up a good one for your price range.
Best advice: stick around here for a bit, learn some more, and watch for the member's sales -- almost always great watches for good (fair) prices and virtually no chance of being ripped off.
@STANDY thanks for the observation. May I ask, where would you suggest is the best site to buy a Vintage Omega? Chrono24 at least seems to offer reasonable security when you buy from a Dealer. My budget is, between $1,000 and $2,000 Australian Pesos. Also, when buying in AU from overseas we must add 15% to the import price for GST and Duties, alas, alas.
