Forums Latest Members
  1. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    Hi Guys,

    I'm new to this forum and I just wanted to say thanks for providing such helpful info. I'm sorry if this isn't the correct place to post a question, but I wanted a second opinion. I'm relatively new to collecting vintage watches and I'm close to making my very first purchase on ebay. The seller has a relatively good reputation and his listing is for a "Vintage Omega Automatic SS with rare cal 560 movement. I obviously know the popular models like the geneve, deville, seamaster, etc but this one puzzles me. I already read the popular post
    http://omegaconstellationcollectors.blogspot.com/2009/07/unearthed-more-omega-calibre-560.html
    but I still have questions?

    1. Is this watch legit? Worth purchasing? If so, how much would you suggest I pay?
    2. Is this a generic version of an omega? If not, what model is it?
    2. Is the dial refinished? Does everything on this watch look original?

    Thanks guys, some guidance would be greatly appreciated and sorry again, if this is the wrong place to put it
    -Chris
     
    s-l1600-1.jpg s-l1600-2.jpg s-l1600-3.jpg s-l1600-4.jpg s-l1600-5.jpg s-l1600-6.jpg s-l1600-7.jpg s-l1600-8.jpg s-l1600-9.jpg
  2. Vercingetorix Spam Risk Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    3,266
    Likes
    5,256
  3. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    STANDY likes this.
  4. Vercingetorix Spam Risk Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    3,266
    Likes
    5,256
    According to Omega, via the link, the watch should have a 562 or 565 not 560.
     
  5. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    dear o dear...sigh...thank you for the info
     
  6. Dan S Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    18,810
    Likes
    43,263
    The OVD is not comprehensive, and there are a lot of threads about the use of cal 560 in several references including 166.002, so I'm not sure that's enough to disqualify the watch.

    However, the hands need a closer look, since they should have lume to match the dial. The photos aren't good, but they appear to show black inlay in the hands, not lume.
     
    Edited Dec 23, 2018
    lecq likes this.
  7. padders Oooo subtitles! Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    8,992
    Likes
    13,941
    The XX0 movement’s like the 500, 550 and 560 shown here are US market versions with a reduced jewel count of 17. This was for tax reasons and is also indicated by the OXG stamp. These are not always shown on the OVD but are valid when found in US delivered watches. Personally I would rather have a ful jewel count!
     
    lecq likes this.
  8. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    again sorry for the novice question, but could that just be where the lume used to be?
     
  9. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    So in your eyes this is a legit watch?
     
  10. Edward53 Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    IMO the watch is legitimate and the hands are that colour because the lume has fallen out. The case looks somewhat polished and I'd want an unremarkable Omega like that one to be a lot more crisp.
     
    lecq likes this.
  11. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    Thank you Edward53 for the info. How much would you pay for the watch?
     
  12. Edward53 Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    Personally? I wouldn't, I'd wait for a sharper example to come along.
     
    lecq likes this.
  13. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    Thanks everyone! Really value the opinions and info
     
  14. Edward53 Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    Spend some time studying and getting your eye in for what's good, what's bad and what's boring. No problems with the dial here or hands (that's just my opinion), and the crown is correct, but apart from the polishing, the case is a bit bland with those straight lugs and no facets. Oh and as you said, it is a generic Omega. The 560 movement is ok but this range is not rare yet and you can and should be more picky about your first vintage.
     
    lecq likes this.
  15. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    We shall be more patient then. It was tempting going for a watch that was only $350
     
  16. Edward53 Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    I am going to bed in a moment (it is midnight here) but I just want to say you risk falling into the classic beginner trap, ie thinking something is a good buy because it's cheap. Buy a cheap mediocre watch and as you learn more about watches, it will disappoint you increasingly. Spend more on a really nice one and the reverse is true. You're not really saving money either, as when you decide to upgrade you'll discover how difficult it is to sell on a mediocre watch. Good ones tend to sell themselves. Best of luck!
     
    dougiedude, KingCrouchy and lecq like this.
  17. lecq Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    1
    great advice that I will take. Appreciate it
     
  18. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Dec 23, 2018

    Posts
    16,352
    Likes
    44,924
    Been here a bit and at $350 the above watch is a great first piece.

    Buy it and enjoy it.

    It’s not a collectors piece but for $350 it’s a solid watch and you won’t loose much or any if you get deeper in the vintage game.

    Nice dial, clean movement ( except the few bits of lint ::facepalm2:: service will sort that ) case isn’t bad and the crown is also Omega
     
    fskywalker, efauser and lecq like this.