- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
Seamaster logos and Co.
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·... but I saw recently a watch posted by @ConElPueblo (if I’m not mistaken) that change my certainty...
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·I’m so wondering, What is the correct logo for a late 40 / early 50 seamaster?!? And more: how could it helps to identify a redial?
- Posts
- 3,839
- Likes
- 8,638
redpcar
·Also compare the patina of the hands vs the dial 😲
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·Ok, but about the logo? Could this be ok for the age?
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·That have with this watch not so much to do. It is only an example to learn something more. If the hands was in patina with the dial, what you s said about the watch?
- Posts
- 20,203
- Likes
- 46,862
- Posts
- 3,839
- Likes
- 8,638
redpcar
·The edges are too soft? Finish is wicking up the sides of the logo? Or just wrong logo / dial combination? I can't tell from the pick.
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·This is the logo I’m expecting on an old seamaster...
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·But the (extremely beautiful) seamaster on the second picture says something else...
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
nicolsson
·What is your opinion/
- Posts
- 3,839
- Likes
- 8,638
redpcar
·The "S" on Seamaster on the first pic is a later version than your second pic. Omega changed it in 1959 (?) This is mine from '54.
Coat hanger "S" vs the round "S".
Coat hanger "S" vs the round "S".
- Posts
- 20,203
- Likes
- 46,862
Dan S
·I think there is a thread somewhere that summarizes many different renderings of "Seamaster".
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
- Posts
- 2,822
- Likes
- 9,160
BenBagbag
·The seamaster font on the 2576 you posted is totally legit.
Lemme pull up a pic of mine...
Oh yeah and normal for hands to show more wear than dial from my limited experience.
Lemme pull up a pic of mine...
Oh yeah and normal for hands to show more wear than dial from my limited experience.
- Posts
- 3,839
- Likes
- 8,638
redpcar
·Ask the seller to adjust the hands to 9:15 so we can see the "Seamaster" more clearly. Unless the price was right, I would move on. Hands in that condition cause me great concern. Why put a shiny dial behind rusted / crusted hands? If you are going through the trouble of putting together a watch and taking nice pics in a photo box, why not take care of the hands?
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
- Posts
- 1,232
- Likes
- 5,681
Rochete
·The "S" on Seamaster on the first pic is a later version than your second pic. Omega changed it in 1959 (?) This is mine from '54.
Coat hanger "S" vs the round "S".
But yours is like neither 1st or 2d OP's pic. "S" is different in each one.
Mine (1954) seems to to be like OP's second pic:
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 198
