Seamaster 300m Diver Orange

Posts
1,978
Likes
2,139
This is the thing that always strikes me when I hear this specific criticism of Omega. Rolex basically makes a few watches, all with a similar looking case, many based on variations of the same movement, and then they change dials and colours, just like what people complain that Omega does. But they get a pass on this for some reason.

Omega has always offered a ton of models. When people say that this is a recent thing and it's killing the brand or whatever, I always get a chuckle.
Yeah, I don't get the argument. Rolex has about 500k different Datejust and OP combos, and now like 30k different GMT masters. Omega has a handful of color schemes for the 300m.

The difference is you can see all of the Omegas and choose the one you want in store!
 
Posts
145
Likes
118
This is the thing that always strikes me when I hear this specific criticism of Omega. Rolex basically makes a few watches, all with a similar looking case, many based on variations of the same movement, and then they change dials and colours, just like what people complain that Omega does. But they get a pass on this for some reason.

Omega has always offered a ton of models. When people say that this is a recent thing and it's killing the brand or whatever, I always get a chuckle.
I think the reason for this is that Rolex is thought off more as a brand rather than a luxory watch maker. While Omega is always thought off as a watchmaker than anything else
 
Posts
511
Likes
989
I think the reason for this is that Rolex is thought off more as a brand rather than a luxory watch maker. While Omega is always thought off as a watchmaker than anything else
Both are luxury watchmakers, with a rich history in my book. Both have well made calibers and capable of fine watchmaking.
 
Posts
33
Likes
35
Even if I did like the model, I still wouldn’t be interested, because I’m waiting for the new generation. I’m afraid Omega is losing momentum - just like Blancpain did with the smaller versions of the Fifty Fathoms. You don’t hear anyone talking about them, do you?

Too little too late.
 
Posts
1,853
Likes
2,814
Different strokes for different folks: I’m sufficiently pleased with these new releases—don’t feel antsy for a new generation. Offering a no-date, scrapping the overwrought wave dial; I feel listened to. 😀 I do agree with the previous poster who wishes they would reduce the case size. I wish they offered it on a real bracelet. And I wish they’d lose the He valve, but that’s an unpopular sentiment, I know.

As for Blancpain, How much does anyone ever talk about them? They strike me as a higher level brand that has a smaller market share and appeal—and I assume their devotees are buzzing plenty about the new releases. If I had Blancpain money to burn on watches, I’d ditch this sideshow and move to the Blancpain Forum (assuming such a thing exists).
 
Posts
29,669
Likes
76,827
As for Blancpain, How much does anyone ever talk about them? They strike me as a higher level brand that has a smaller market share and appeal—and I assume their devotees are buzzing plenty about the new releases. If I had Blancpain money to burn on watches, I’d ditch this sideshow and move to the Blancpain Forum (assuming such a thing exists).
They do make a nice watch...I kinda miss mine...

 
Posts
2,979
Likes
8,731
This is the thing that always strikes me when I hear this specific criticism of Omega. Rolex basically makes a few watches, all with a similar looking case, many based on variations of the same movement, and then they change dials and colours, just like what people complain that Omega does. But they get a pass on this for some reason.

Omega has always offered a ton of models. When people say that this is a recent thing and it's killing the brand or whatever, I always get a chuckle.
Its odd that these people think variety is a bad thing. If you dont like the LE dont buy it and if you dont like black there are other colors. Omegas job is to sell watches, not to simplify the range for some collectors.
 
Posts
846
Likes
2,697
Hope it looks better in the flesh than online. I bet it does. For some reason the pictures make my eyes tired a bit.
 
Posts
3,873
Likes
8,367
His general take on Omega is that they’ve diluted their brand and gone too gimmicky with all the color variants and limited editions and commemorative pieces and heritage lines, etc.
Yeah, I don't get the argument.
Its odd that these people think
This is the thing that always strikes me when I hear this specific criticism of Omega

The person who posted the criticism- and I suspect that the grand majority of people who consistently use this argument- they're not interested in any sort of rational debate. These statements are made with no regard to how logical they aren't. These people aren't thinking.

If a statement inherently does not hold water and the person who made the statement doesn't seem interested in any fashion to discussion about the statement, it's likely the motivation behind the statement is the point.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,873
Likes
8,367
I think the reason for this is that Rolex is thought off more as a brand rather than a luxory watch maker. While Omega is always thought off as a watchmaker than anything else

this might have been the case in the 1990s, but I don't believe it is the case in 2025. There's a cultural subset that scoffs at any brand perceived as "below" Rolex, but it does not seem to be the main stance today. As far as I can tell, over the last decade and a half, Omega has consistently been in the top three or four best known watch brands and either two or three in sales behind Rolex. Omega has been referred to as the eternal "runner up" to Rolex for a long time.

The situation is fairly simple imo. Humans inherently suck at ranking things objectively. In fact, we just in general, suck at objectivity. Believing that something is golden, or best, and ignoring faults, while criticizing something perceived as not best, and scapegoating it and even hyperfocusing on the same things that are perceived as faults in item #2, is just the default way that (unfortunately) many people look at the world.


To be completely honest, it would actually be AWESOME if people kept this type of thinking limited to luxury brands and sports teams, maybe then the world wouldn't be so incredibly polarized and non-sensical.
 
Posts
2,979
Likes
8,731
Just to be clear, my comment was not directed at any specific member. I have seen this stated many times here on OF and have always wondered why some think variety is a bad thing.

Sometimes I think Omega knows what they are doing.
 
Posts
3,873
Likes
8,367
Just to be clear, my comment was not directed at any specific member. I have seen this stated many times here on OF and have always wondered why some think variety is a bad thing.

Sometimes I think Omega knows what they are doing.

Fair and reasonable. Some of my posts lately have been... a bit roughly and bluntly worded.
 
Posts
145
Likes
118
this might have been the case in the 1990s, but I don't believe it is the case in 2025. There's a cultural subset that scoffs at any brand perceived as "below" Rolex, but it does not seem to be the main stance today. As far as I can tell, over the last decade and a half, Omega has consistently been in the top three or four best known watch brands and either two or three in sales behind Rolex. Omega has been referred to as the eternal "runner up" to Rolex for a long time.
In eastern Asia, this is still the case. As all 2nd hand watch shops in Asia still consider Rolex to be the creame de la creame when it comes to luxury watches.

The situation is fairly simple imo. Humans inherently suck at ranking things objectively. In fact, we just in general, suck at objectivity. Believing that something is golden, or best, and ignoring faults, while criticizing something perceived as not best, and scapegoating it and even hyperfocusing on the same things that are perceived as faults in item #2, is just the default way that (unfortunately) many people look at the world.


To be completely honest, it would actually be AWESOME if people kept this type of thinking limited to luxury brands and sports teams, maybe then the world wouldn't be so incredibly polarized and non-sensical.
I agree with you on this 100%. But as they say "too error is to human as to human is to error......"
 
Posts
3,873
Likes
8,367
eastern Asia, this is still the case. As all 2nd hand watch shops in Asia still consider Rolex to be the creame de la creame when it comes to luxury watches.

I appreciate the information, I must admit I'm not particularly versed on Asian watch culture.
 
Posts
145
Likes
118
I appreciate the information, I must admit I'm not particularly versed on Asian watch culture.
Yeah, in eastern Asia if you wear a Rolex means that you are rich, wealthy and hold a very high position within a multinational company.

However since China has been producing Super Clones of Rolex watches that are so good, you don't know who is wearing a real Rolex. In fact my barber wears a gold Daytona on a brown leather strap, which I have seen allot of delivery people wearing on the streets of HK.
 
Posts
2,979
Likes
8,731
Fair and reasonable. Some of my posts lately have been... a bit roughly and bluntly worded.
I am sorry Erich, but I have to disagree with you on this; your post are always reasonable and well founded and delivered in the manner of a true gentleman.
 
Posts
337
Likes
288
I wanted the orange to be chrome orange, but the enamel is extremely glossy. If this watch had waved dials I would have gotten it. The orange band is gorgeous though!

 
Posts
145
Likes
118
I wanted the orange to be chrome orange, but the enamel is extremely glossy. If this watch had waved dials I would have gotten it. The orange band is gorgeous though!

That doesn't look as bad as I thought it would. Shame that Omega seems to be moving away from the traditional Seamaster 300M Pro Diver 5 link bracelet, as that is the most comfortable metal watch bracelet I have ever worn.
 
Posts
2,180
Likes
2,354
Local AD had it on the rubber today. So of course I had to try it on.

Must say in the flesh the dial is lovely and I prefer it over monochrome small waves. The strap is lovely & fit, maybe too orange for me & I’ll go black additionally.

Just to need to wait to see if anything else it announced.

Also debate if this or go back to the Speedy.

 
Posts
239
Likes
304
Local AD had it on the rubber today. So of course I had to try it on.

Must say in the flesh the dial is lovely and I prefer it over monochrome small waves. The strap is lovely & fit, maybe too orange for me & I’ll go black additionally.

Just to need to wait to see if anything else it announced.

Also debate if this or go back to the Speedy.

Looks nice on the wrist.