Seamaster 300 ref. 2913-5 from 1958

Posts
54
Likes
27
Cases generally stand up to a lot of environmental abuse as they’re stainless steel. They certainly do much better than everything else. I’ve got a fair few finds like this. As @Duracuir1 mentioned, you’ve already made a personal connection to the watch by the circumstances with which you bought it. This makes it a very appealing proposition to own, but it’s easy to have rose tinted glasses when thinking about how others see it. If you want to keep it, then for purchase price plus €500 you’ll have a very cool watch (and permanent reminder of that day).
Yeah, I’m in love!
 
Posts
10,305
Likes
16,126
The result of this collaboration was the Omega Seamaster and the Omega Constellation for which Genta designed various cases and dials.
The first Omega Seamaster was designed in 1948 and was a different smaller fat lug model to that which you own. Genta had nothing to do with that AFAIK (he started watch design work in 1950) so it is wrong to assume he had anything to do with the SM300 based on that sentence alone. He did have a hand in the Dog leg, C case and perhaps tonneau lug Connies as far as I am aware but not the 1957 Trilogy watches (one of which was the SM300) AFAIK. He did design the much later Seamaster Polaris, but that is a 1980s thing.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,327
Likes
12,964
Well, if you want to keep the dial etc as-is, the only real difficulty I see is the bezel insert, for which, realistically, you’ll need a repro part. It’ll never be in a “collector-grade” condition anyway, so why not (and I dislike the term, but I hope everyone knows how it’s meant).
For the movement: 501s were produced in millions, one of the (if not the) easiest 50s Omega movement to come by. Buy a good example, shouldn’t set you back more than 200$. Have a watchmaker who’s into vintage watches replace it and, importantly, keep the serial of your watch. There might be some smaller issues to take care of, rust at the stem / hands etc but that shouldn’t be an insurmountable object.
Would love to see the final result. 😀
 
Posts
54
Likes
27
Well, if you want to keep the dial etc as-is, the only real difficulty I see is the bezel insert, for which, realistically, you’ll need a repro part. It’ll never be in a “collector-grade” condition anyway, so why not (and I dislike the term, but I hope everyone knows how it’s meant).
For the movement: 501s were produced in millions, one of the (if not the) easiest 50s Omega movement to come by. Buy a good example, shouldn’t set you back more than 200$. Have a watchmaker who’s into vintage watches replace it and, importantly, keep the serial of your watch. There might be some smaller issues to take care of, rust at the stem / hands etc but that shouldn’t be an insurmountable object.
Would love to see the final result. 😀
Thank you! Will do!
 
Posts
54
Likes
27
The first Omega Seamaster was designed in 1948 and was a different smaller fat lug model to that which you own. Genta had nothing to do with that AFAIK (he started watch design work in 1950) so it is wrong to assume he had anything to do with the SM300 based on that sentence alone. He did have a hand in the Dog leg, C case and perhaps tonneau lug Connies as far as I am aware but not the 1957 Trilogy watches (one of which was the SM300) AFAIK. He did design the much later Seamaster Polaris, but that is a 1980s thing.
Good to know, thanks!
 
Posts
2,597
Likes
5,656
Out of interest… how many Parisians have messaged you asking for the name of the antique store 😁
 
Posts
54
Likes
27
Out of interest… how many Parisians have messaged you asking for the name of the antique store 😁
Too many to count, but I don’t even know the name of it and it’s closing down very soon
 
Posts
1,706
Likes
7,066
Interesting find and I like the idea to restore it just technical wise. I just wanted to add, that the watch at least have seen one service in the past. The crown is one from end of 60s (round Omega logo vs. Naiad Flat Feet or Mercedes crown).

Nico
 
Posts
6,331
Likes
9,920
Dreamcatch...
 
Posts
54
Likes
27
Dreamcatch...
I’m over the Moon on this. One of the earliest 300s ever made and it looks sick
 
Posts
54
Likes
27
Interesting find and I like the idea to restore it just technical wise. I just wanted to add, that the watch at least have seen one service in the past. The crown is one from end of 60s (round Omega logo vs. Naiad Flat Feet or Mercedes crown).

Nico
Thanks a lot for the info! And yeah, I want it to look blown up as it does now, except working like a charm
 
Posts
12,954
Likes
22,426
If you’re keeping the dial and bezel as is, it simply needs a through clean and what I expect will be a costly movement service. I guess the dial may also need some stabilisation to prevent further deterioration or debris contaminating the movement.

I’d assume Omega won’t service this as they’ll insist on a new dial. Best to try and find an independent watchmaker with an Omega parts account and let them advise you as to the best course of action.

I’d assume it could be rescued for under €800 dependant on parts.
 
Posts
54
Likes
27
If you’re keeping the dial and bezel as is, it simply needs a through clean and what I expect will be a costly movement service. I guess the dial may also need some stabilisation to prevent further deterioration or debris contaminating the movement.

I’d assume Omega won’t service this as they’ll insist on a new dial. Best to try and find an independent watchmaker with an Omega parts account and let them advise you as to the best course of action.

I’d assume it could be rescued for under €800 dependant on parts.
No way I’m letting omega touch my watch
 
Posts
6,331
Likes
9,920
it looks sick
It does. Litterally 😲😁
 
Posts
29,234
Likes
75,568
If you’re keeping the dial and bezel as is, it simply needs a through clean and what I expect will be a costly movement service. I guess the dial may also need some stabilisation to prevent further deterioration or debris contaminating the movement.

I’d assume Omega won’t service this as they’ll insist on a new dial. Best to try and find an independent watchmaker with an Omega parts account and let them advise you as to the best course of action.

I’d assume it could be rescued for under €800 dependant on parts.

Cost will depend a great deal on the parts required. The movement will need likely everything steel replaced, so there are some options. Donor movements can be useful, but often have the same worn out parts inside that you are trying to replace, so not always the panacea that people imagine (unless the watchmaker you use doesn't bother looking for wear)...

I expect 800 euro would be on the low side for this one.
 
Posts
12,954
Likes
22,426
Cost will depend a great deal on the parts required. The movement will need likely everything steel replaced, so there are some options. Donor movements can be useful, but often have the same worn out parts inside that you are trying to replace, so not always the panacea that people imagine (unless the watchmaker you use doesn't bother looking for wear)...

I expect 800 euro would be on the low side for this one.

Happy to defer to your experience Al.

I’ve had a couple of old 5xx movements serviced by an independent recently that needed new parts and came in around £400-600, however although there were various wheels, axle kits etc (no idea if that’s the correct terminology) that were replaced it probably would be dwarfed by what’s required here.
Edited:
 
Posts
29,234
Likes
75,568
Happy to defer to your experience Al.

I’ve had a couple of old 5xx movements serviced by an independent recently that needed new parts and came in around £400-600, however although there were various wheels, axle kits etc (no idea if that’s the correct terminology) that were relaxed it probably would be dwarfed by what’s required here.

Usually the financial viability of this will come down to the condition of the balance. But a donor can still be of use in the regard.

Not a whole lot of parts for this caliber are still available from Omega, so it will be a case of donors and parts bought on the open market, which can get expensive certainly.