Seamaster 300 question - how original?

Posts
383
Likes
349
Hi dear Seamaster specialists. See below. How original do you think this is. Seller states 100%. It might be the reflection but the hands seem odd.
Then the bezel. Next to the fact that it looks “too good” I also feel that the numbers are not in line with other bezels I see and more “thin printed”. Where there fakes for the 300? Aftermarket or later period service bezel inserts?

Thanks!

 
Posts
383
Likes
349
This is a great reference. Thanks very much for sending this through.
The thing is that this would of course be the type F. The case is 165024 (with HF logo) which would be a combination not possible from the table. The serial is 18xxxxxx making it 1961. Different cal inside? No 300 in that year and certainly not this one.

https://omegaforums.net/attachments/bezel_12-jpg.299246/

if the bezel is fake it clearly can only be the first fake one but it looks more like type F than the fake one.

anybody????
Edited:
 
Posts
354
Likes
1,321
It sounds very much like a watch assembled from a multitude of mismatched parts. Caveat emptor
 
Posts
383
Likes
349
Well the conclusions were as follows:
All original Omega, but
Movement not from the year of the watch, bezel later replacement bezel, crown not the original Naiad crown, hands either later version with later lume or overly polished.
Watch sold to somebody else.
“Case closed”.