Seamaster 2577

Posts
96
Likes
155
Trying to figure out if this dial on a Seamaster 2577 is refinished or not. Currently not sure, originally I thought no, then yes as the dial looks too clean, slight deotriation maybe, maybe not, minute markers are some longer than other, are they positioned too far back from the hour markers, is the text correct.

Then in comparison to others I am now wavering back across to an original unfinished dial.


So this is the dial I am referring to.

In comparison,the dial below on a sold 2577 was advertised as original condition, which I doubt. I thought the text was slightly incorrect.


Looking at a few other 2577, the seamaster text is in a different position on the 4th photo, but the minute markers seem to be similar to the 3rd and 4th photo to the dial in question.

Any help appreciated.

 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,778
I see no issues with dial number one.
 
Posts
96
Likes
155
I see no issues with dial number one.

Thank you, trying to learn from all the good knowledge and insight from you guys, think I go blind looking at dials sometimes. See things that are not there, and probably miss the obvious.
 
Posts
2,929
Likes
6,104
Yes: I forgot: in comparison to #2 with the square.
lume on hands need lume on hour indexes
edit: and vice versa
 
Posts
96
Likes
155
In comparison to similar dials, I have no lume on any indices, but open to correction.

Would we sée a "T" on the dial if Lume was to be present.
 
Posts
2,929
Likes
6,104
In comparison to similar dials, I have no lume on any indices, but open to correction.

Would we sée a "T" on the dial if Lume was to be present.
not if it is radium 😉
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
15,687
In comparison to similar dials, I have no lume on any indices, but open to correction.

Would we sée a "T" on the dial if Lume was to be present.
Your dial looks original to me, the indices except the numerals contains lume as it should.
The other dials you posted have another dial layout and therefore lume on other places than yours.

No T since this is a watch from the 50s (T is for tritium)
 
Posts
2,929
Likes
6,104
@hejsam : Show me any (hands lumed!) 50ies Omega with NO lume on 12 / 6 ( 3 -9)

edit: Seamaster in steel , CS , large second hand
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
15,687
@hejsam : Show me any (hands lumed!) 50ies Omega with NO lume on 12 / 6 ( 3 -9)

edit: Seamaster in steel , CS , large second hand
All with a similar dial configuration as the poster showed, or what do you mean?
There are loads of them
 
Posts
299
Likes
792
What about that one? I see some issues with it probably old refinished, right? No lume on numerals.
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
15,687
What about that one? I see some issues with it probably old refinished, right? No lume on numerals.
Looks fine to me, whats your issues?
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
15,687
The space between minute track and markers.
The indices can have fallen off at some point and then attached back again and ended up a bit crocked, not that uncommon they fall off "naturally". But can of course also be a hint for redial if the indices have been picked off, but in this case I think the dial looks fine otherwise but picutre quality is not great.
 
Posts
2,929
Likes
6,104
All with a similar dial configuration as the poster showed, or what do you mean?
There are loads of them
OK 👍
 
Posts
299
Likes
792
Well, who knows for the dial which is 70 years old. Let's call it OK.
 
Posts
1,282
Likes
5,716
Black version of the OP’s watch. As pointed out by @hejsam pretty common to have no lume on the numeral indices.