Forums Latest Members

Seamaster 176.007 appreciation. Love that 70's funk!

  1. dialstatic Oct 28, 2016

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    Shots look great, and the watch looks awesome! I really like how it looks on isofrane, too.

    Ooh, I've been looking for a set of vintage ones for this model! Mind if I PM you?
     
    Ken G likes this.
  2. Albe100 Oct 28, 2016

    Posts
    572
    Likes
    613
    Oups! Congrats on correcting it all. Looks great!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    Ken G likes this.
  3. dialstatic Dec 22, 2016

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    It's mentioned as modern (...more modern than the one before it ;-) but this document on Connie buckles led me to believe your (closed omega symbol) buckle is not only genuine, but period correct:

    http://users.tpg.com.au/mondodec//Omega_Constellation_Accessories_Part_1.pdf

    ...which is a good thing, since I was finally able to source exactly the same as yours (for exactly the same strap on exactly the same watch).

    C0B9BA19-3227-4D25-BBC7-1E666E6BDE60.jpg
     
    Edited Dec 22, 2016
    ahartfie, zxrmatt and Ken G like this.
  4. Ken G Dec 22, 2016

    Posts
    349
    Likes
    364
    ^^^^
    Congratulations! :thumbsup:

    And thanks for confirming...
     
    dialstatic likes this.
  5. dialstatic Feb 12, 2017

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    Wanted to share this 'semi-tropical' dial with you, especially in combination with the amusing description. Can't help but wonder if it's possible. The text reads:

    "Provenance of the watch: it has been worn by a gentleman in Africa who wore a suit all day which caused discoloration of half the dial."

    IMG_2837.JPG

    IMG_2838.JPG
     
  6. Andy K Dreaming about winning an OFfie one day. Feb 12, 2017

    Posts
    1,819
    Likes
    5,885
    ...another reason not to wear a suit!
     
    dialstatic likes this.
  7. alfanator Mar 15, 2017

    Posts
    707
    Likes
    3,717
    My daughter was messing around with my watch Case this weekend. She saw this watch and said hey it looks like R2-D2.
    New nickname for this watch is R2-D2.
     
  8. Screwbacks Mar 15, 2017

    Posts
    1,682
    Likes
    4,859
    sharing my 007
     
    IMG_20170119_123302.jpg
    Searching, ConElPueblo, GregH and 2 others like this.
  9. Igora Mar 15, 2017

    Posts
    386
    Likes
    1,146
    one of the best blue dials I have ever seen! here is mine:

    [​IMG]
     
    Searching, GregH, Andy K and 4 others like this.
  10. Screwbacks Mar 15, 2017

    Posts
    1,682
    Likes
    4,859
    nice, sunburst blue
     
  11. dialstatic Mar 21, 2017

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    Incoming....

    IMG_4720.JPG

    This was the clearest / sharpest pic by far, so fingers crossed. Anyway, the price was decent and I couldn't resist the sunburst, syringe minute hand and low serial number. Oh well, I guess I'll find out soon enough :rolleyes:
     
    Edited Mar 21, 2017
    Searching, GregH, ahartfie and 2 others like this.
  12. Andy K Dreaming about winning an OFfie one day. Mar 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,819
    Likes
    5,885
    ::popcorn:: Congrats @dialstatic! Can't wait to see clear pics.
     
    dialstatic likes this.
  13. photo500 Mar 21, 2017

    Posts
    519
    Likes
    1,469
    Here's mine, going to be a while before I get around to sorting it out [emoji26] All the bits are there but being a Watchmaker means the personal work has to take a back seat.

    IMG_1853.JPG
     
  14. dialstatic Mar 21, 2017

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    Cool! That's a relatively rare 176.001 (without the tachy ring). Very interested in seeing this once you have worked your magic on it.
     
    photo500 likes this.
  15. Searching Mar 21, 2017

    Posts
    40
    Likes
    72
    Here is mine with tropical deal :) and wrong bracelet... i m still searching for one missing end link 653...

    20170124_093609.jpg
     
    joso likes this.
  16. dialstatic Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    Quick pic - just arrived.

    Super happy with it! The case looks unpolished: sides are shiny, edges are sharp enough (some dulling that seems consistent with wearing rather than polishing), and the top is more matte, with a hint of the original sunburst (plus some minor scratches that simply make it an 'honest watch' imo).

    I adore the original dial - I've really missed the sunburst metallic after the one on my other 007 got replaced with a matte service one. Tritium pips are largely intact and have had only very minimal impact on the dial: just a little oxidation of the paint at 3, 6 and 9 where there are no hour markers. No paint flaked off these markers either, as is often the case. Transitional caseback is consistent with the low serial (PM'ed to @Andy K ) and the chronograph seems to function very well, resetting nicely to zero.

    But it's the hour and minute hands that do it for me. They're just perfect. After a little TLC (crystal polishing, DNA removal, and off to my watchmaker for an inspection) I'll be one happy camper.

    IMG_4833.JPG
     
    Edited Mar 23, 2017
  17. Igora Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    386
    Likes
    1,146
    nice one! congrats!
    mine says hello:
    [​IMG]
     
    Searching, Lou P, ahartfie and 3 others like this.
  18. Andy K Dreaming about winning an OFfie one day. Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    1,819
    Likes
    5,885
    Great find. Congrats!
     
    dialstatic likes this.
  19. pfibiger Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    31
    Likes
    46
    Wanted to share my new-to-me 176.007. I bought it from the son of the original owner, aside from an deep scratch in the crystal (which may not be original, and which I am working on the scratch w/ polywatch) It is near perfect condition. The original case sunburst is very prevalent. I tried to submit the serial to calibre1040.com but it didn't look like it went through. The serial is: 355973XX -- is there any way to date its production short of ordering an extract? Thanks!
     
    IMG_4065.JPG
    Searching, Lou P, Andy K and 3 others like this.
  20. dialstatic Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    924
    Likes
    1,773
    Nice one!

    According the the tables floating around on the set (e.g. http://chronomaddox.com/omega_serial_numbers.html) the movement dates to 1972 (or mayne 73). Remember, it's not an exact science and there's no way to tell if it was put in the case & shipped in that year without an extract.

    And according to Andy's excellent website (http://www.calibre1040.com/omega-se...-cal-1040-1041-serial-number-data-and-charts/) your serial is very plausible for a 176.007. Specifically:

    IMG_4863.JPG