I have to say that none of the points I thought gave cause to concern has been addressed properly, IMO.
Dial colour not seen previously on a SAS Polarouter (right?).
Text of a type not seen previously.
Missing "Swiss" and "Polarouter".
Lumed hands on dial without any lume dots.
Print quality low.
The fact is that pretty much every point of visual interest on this watch is an exception to what is considered the norm. Adding to that, I feel that the overall presentation of the dial is just... I don't know how to put this in a different way than "clumsy". That gold ink applied in rather heavy manner on the black dial makes for an unelegant look which I just don't associate with UG, least of all the other SAS Pole/arouters I've seen here.
The only reason I am not expressing myself more confidently is that I am not that into UG, but what I know from assessing vintage watches in general enough inconsistencies are evident for me to, personally, judge this one out.
Click to expand...