Restoration of destroyed Rolex Submariner [video]

Posts
2,510
Likes
3,727
Here comes the parade of negative nancys right on cue...

Nothing less than completely deserved from all posts I read of his in this thread so far. IDGAF how talented someone is when they are a jerk about it and unwilling to share information. Pretty much the same as Karen from the HOA that refuses to share her potluck recipes.
 
Posts
20,708
Likes
47,575
Here comes the parade of negative nancys right on cue...

Sorry, I don't know what came over me, I accidentally posted something substantive, and forgot that we were supposed to limit our comments to juvenile humor, ass-kissing, and picking fights with other members.
 
Posts
27,593
Likes
70,197
Reluctance to venture into more (should I say) unconventional 'cleaning' techniques is completely understandable- dial cleaning is not a part of watchmaking curriculum and watchmakers hate dial restoration.

Certainly dial cleaning techniques were taught (at least to me) so I do clean dials. The dial in question here I would have cleaned the normal way I do it, taking the time to remove the shattered particles using a soft brush and Bergeon cleaning sticks. I understand flooding dial with the mystery liquid may have been faster but for me there's simply no reason to do so, at least that I could see.

The silvered dial you showed I clean this style using a very specific type of eraser (certainly nothing I was taught), as those dials hold up very well to cleaning. The vintage dials with bad lacquer, well those are very risky to clean. Often when the old lacquer is dissolved, the text and other marking comes with it. For every successful one I see, I can only imagine there are many unsuccessful ones out there.

Chemical processes are irreversible and unpredictable so be careful and go easy. Be brave, it's fun.

If you are restoring a dial on watch you have bought and are putting up for sale or something, and it's completely your loss if something goes wrong, then by all means be brave. For me, that's not what I do, so I'm fine with a more conservative approach, as are my clients.

It's all about calculated risks as you say, we just have different calculations.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
37
Likes
294
It's worth remembering that threads on the topic of dial cleaning suffer from severe selection bias, so don't get too excited. People are happy to post the results when they happen to be successful, but it's quite rare that someone bothers to show the many times that they completely destroy the dial in trying to clean it. It the blue liquid hadn't been successful, or further damaged the dial, then this thread would not exist. We have no idea what fraction of the attempts are successful.

Success rate? How about 10 out of 10?
Blue stuff, pitted and heavily oxidized gold hands, customer's watch - done as we speak (note the date).
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,791
I would imagine extreme jobs require extreme measures. It's probably also geographical as some watch makers don't see the kinds of mold, mildew and general "hazing over" that some vintage watch dials can suffer from in the tropical climates. In the Philippines my wife's Rolex trained Godfather regularly cleans dials, markers and hands with some sort of combination including lens cleaner stuff as there is no way those stains are going to come off with a brush or pieces of wood. I suppose the methods matter on what exactly one is trying to clean.
 
Posts
16,315
Likes
34,374
Success rate? How about 10 out of 10?
Blue stuff, pitted and heavily oxidized gold hands, customer's watch - done as we speak (note the date).

$3.40 for the SMH nowdays?

Phew, glad I'm in Melbourne, only $2 for our version.
 
Posts
223
Likes
190
This is a very sensitive issue for many watch enthusiasts because we are dealing here with emotions and perpetuated myths, rather than facts.

1. Look properly after your watch and treat it with respect as you would care for any high precision mechanical instrument and you'll never need a dial repair/cleaning/restoration/replacement. Luckily, most watch enthusiasts are careful and respectful.

2. When watch is severely damaged, then the right thing is to take it to manufacturer and have the damaged parts replaced. Broken Rolex should go to Rolex service centre.

3. However, Rolex (and every other Swiss watch manufacturer) does not provide dial and hands restoration service - but replacement only. This is unacceptable by collectors because replacement parts 'devalue' the watch on collectors market, in some cases severely.

4. this conflict between official servicing policy and collectors desire for preservation of original dial and hands is yet to be resolved. Clearly, Rolex's job is not to preserve the collectors value of your Rolex, but to return the watch in functional and aesthetically pleasing condition, and eventually, to sell you a new watch. I say nothing wrong with that.

5. For reasons only known to them, some collectors prefer not to deal with Rolex. Taking a watch to an independent watchmaker could be the way to go, but independent watchmakers have no access to original Rolex parts. Most of them use aftermarket and outright fake parts. Some of them are poorly trained and have very limited restoration skills. In many cases, small watchmakers are manipulated to install 'NOS' and fake parts provided by cashed-up collectors/ vintage watch owners.

6. The only win-win solution to all 3 parties (Rolex, watch owners and watchmakers) :
- Rolex to open a dedicated restoration service centre for vintage watches
- Rolex to once again provide training to independent watchmakers and allow them access to spare parts

In my opinion, neither is top priority for Rolex. Until then - we should brace ourselves to all sorts of quackery: from fake parts, poor servicing techniques, outright criminal enterprises who specialise in manufacturing of fake Rolex dial and hands, con artist and con 'dealers', auctioneers, fakers and 'Rolex investors'.

Which makes cleaning a dial with distilled soapy water rather naively innocent...

Great insight, thank you!
 
Posts
2,443
Likes
4,229
Success rate? How about 10 out of 10?
Blue stuff, pitted and heavily oxidized gold hands, customer's watch - done as we speak (note the date).
As @Dan S said,
"People are happy to post the results when they happen to be successful, but it's quite rare that someone bothers to show the many times that they completely destroy the dial in trying to clean it."
You've been so helpful and forthcoming with the details of your cleaning fluids, I'm sure you'd tell us if you ever had a failure while trying to clean a dial. Right?
 
Posts
674
Likes
2,522
Agghhhh, all that lovely patina gone !!! Took decades to get it just right and gone in minutes !!!! ;-).

On seconds thought think I'm going to try some break fluid on my 5513 tonight.

On a more serious note, good results, but surely there were some huge f ups while experimenting, and if fluids are dissolving crud surely there is impact to the lacquer ? How do they look a couple of years later?
 
Posts
261
Likes
179
@Nick Hacko Out of curiosity, how stable is that blue cleaning fluid? What happens 10 - 20 years from now? Will it yellow or cause other side effects?
 
Posts
37
Likes
294
On a more serious note, good results, but surely there were some huge f ups while experimenting?

Not good, excellent results.

Has Novak Djokovic ever lost a set and has Magnus Carlsen ever lost a game? Does Khabib Nurmagamedov gets upset over bleeding nose?

If your goal is to hit the ground at maximum speed, then jumping from plane with no parachute will yield 10/10 result. And if your goal is to impress your wife, then flowers, box of chocolates and a movie night out would have equally predictable outcome.

My goal is to to the best job possible - every time, no exception. And unlike my young colleagues here, I do have unfair advantage: I am not merely a watch repairer, or hobbyists, or yet another anonymous forum troll - I am a third generation Master Watchmaker. You can be cynical about that fact, or cynical about my work - which is by no means perfect - and that's fine, but that would make no difference at all. I am not here to chase more work or to impress you with my skills- this thread started with a simple invitation to watch a short restoration video and have some fun. And as statistics shows, 98.4% of voters like it. What's there not to be happy about?

You guys have a great day, and again, thank you for watching - and I'm off to work. Tonight I intend to upload another restoration video (complete overhaul on a music box / pocket watch automaton which had numerous issues, including gummed up governor). There is a bunch of 1970s Speedmasters, Omega 125, some cool railway pocket watches, a 1973 Daytona, a string of 5513- all sitting in a junk box so who knows what comes next. After that, once we build YouTube subscribership, we'll get into more serious stuff: complex repairs and videos about designing and machining watch components, using state of art modern CNC machinery.

Have a good one,
NH
 
Posts
516
Likes
1,242
He may be coy regarding the mystery blue liquid, which I believe to be "windex"::stirthepot:: but no one in Australia is doing what Nick is doing. Here, (in Australia) we have what we call the "Tall poppy Syndrone," which translates to, anyone that sticks their head above the crowd, usually gets it chopped off, so I know that Nick is used to criticism and more importantly, nothing anyone says is going to divert him from his goals, and his absolute love and dovotion to watch making and horology as a whole. I definitely do not love everything he says, but my respect and admiration for him is real and that has been earnt from following him for the past decade.
 
Posts
336
Likes
448
On seconds thought think I'm going to try some break fluid on my 5513 tonight.



haha yes that was my first thought, this thing is magical 🤨
 
Posts
27,593
Likes
70,197
So much drama could be avoided by just answering a simple question...

Like errantly hitting the ball into the throat of a line judge...to keep the Novak analogy going.
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,791
I thoroughly enjoy your videos and posts, but man you must be a glutton for punishment posting them on this forum 😁
 
Posts
27,593
Likes
70,197
I thoroughly enjoy your videos and posts, but man you must be a glutton for punishment posting them on this forum 😁

It's "Nick against the world" just as he likes it.
 
Posts
681
Likes
1,208
A provocateur, for sure. I suspect that there was no actual physical damage to the dial just surface particles that simply rinsed off.
 
Posts
37
Likes
294
I thoroughly enjoy your videos and posts, but man you must be a glutton for punishment posting them on this forum 😁

Hi Fred - I pay no attention to anonymous comments. Quite frankly, I probably get far more credit than I deserve from those who appreciate horology so all this 'forum drama' is nothing but a harmless fun. We currently have a year 3, year 2 and two year 1 apprentices who are constantly encouraged to share their thoughts and opinions; they are young and witty and we joke all day long. Yesterday, upon arriving to work, I found that one of them taped Archer's photo to my bench lamp - it was hilarious.