Reintroducing a Speedy 2998-2

Posts
693
Likes
705
That's an helluva of a 2998! A truly magnificent piece!

I'm especially thrilled (besides by the wonderful dial of course) to see a unique watch returned from service, and where it has so obviously escaped the bad faith of polishing! A big congrats on a very sympathetic renovation of a piece of watch history! Wear it in good health
Much appreciated. And it's this forum, as well as others, that informed my decisions.
 
Posts
312
Likes
511
¡¡¡¡¡ What a fantastic piece ¡¡¡¡¡¡ , congratulations
 
Posts
34,265
Likes
38,886
Ah, sorry I missed this Spacefruit. BASE 1000 is certainly correct, I'm just wondering if it would have survived servicing 10-15 years later, given its current state compared with the hands. And the crown too. I understand that the Mercedes/Naiad, whatever it's called, crown was early and short-lived. Would it have survived a service?
Does it have a mercedes crown on it?
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
What a beauty - the bezel condition (ghost bezel for you Rolex nerds😎) and tropical dial really make this watch. For me, this watch and the 2915 broad arrow are two of the greatest chronographs ever made.

I personally wouldn't worry about the hands. The alpha hands look correct (minute hand extends all the way to the minute markers) and the lume matches the markers perfectly. As far as the chronograph and subdial hands go, they do look pretty pristine, but I've seen a few never opened 2998's and 2915's that have had similar condition hands (also badly aged ones). Having said that it's entirely possible they are replacements, but seriously, whatever. Best to put it out of your mind, I say, and enjoy this great watch to the fullest! Congrats!
 
Posts
6,667
Likes
11,570
What a beauty - the bezel condition (ghost bezel for you Rolex nerds😎) and tropical dial really make this watch. For me, this watch and the 2915 broad arrow are two of the greatest chronographs ever made.

I personally wouldn't worry about the hands. The alpha hands look correct (minute hand extends all the way to the minute markers) and the lume matches the markers perfectly. As far as the chronograph and subdial hands go, they do look pretty pristine, but I've seen a few never opened 2998's and 2915's that have had similar condition hands (also badly aged ones). Having said that it's entirely possible they are replacements, but seriously, whatever. Best to put it out of your mind, I say, and enjoy this great watch to the fullest! Congrats!

Would love to see photos of the "never opened 2998 and 2915" watches you mention.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
Would love to see photos of the "never opened 2998 and 2915" watches you mention.

Omega museum has pieces that they say have never been opened (went 4 or 5 years ago), and I saw a 2915-3 at HQ Milton a few years back that they believed also had never been opened before (well until they did). Not possible to verify either case, but a couple of them had clean chrono and sub register hands to my memory. I don't have any pics, but maybe you can ask HQ milton to see if they have any in the archives.
 
Posts
693
Likes
705
What a beauty - the bezel condition (ghost bezel for you Rolex nerds😎) and tropical dial really make this watch. For me, this watch and the 2915 broad arrow are two of the greatest chronographs ever made.

I personally wouldn't worry about the hands. The alpha hands look correct (minute hand extends all the way to the minute markers) and the lume matches the markers perfectly. As far as the chronograph and subdial hands go, they do look pretty pristine, but I've seen a few never opened 2998's and 2915's that have had similar condition hands (also badly aged ones). Having said that it's entirely possible they are replacements, but seriously, whatever. Best to put it out of your mind, I say, and enjoy this great watch to the fullest! Congrats!
Thanks.

The faded and banged up bezel(s) really do look like crap close up in photos. And I'm sure they effect value. But in real life it looks kind of silvery-gray, charming, and de-emphasizes the Tachymetre scale, which I have little use for.

As to the hands, and correctness in general, I'm not stressing. I expected more challenges, frankly. The fact that there were few from this group bolsters my belief that if not perfectly original, at least it's correct. And I really did appreciate that one potential flaw being flagged (in addition to the bracelet) since it hadn't occurred to me. I've been looking at a lot of the research photos I've collected of similar and accepted correct examples and see a lot of pretty nice looking hands.

But I still hope to uncover more about the watch's history. For example, I found out, though haven't yet 100% confirmed, that the owner died in 1990. So that shortens the watch's actually used life from 50 odd years to 30 years or less. And given the mostly non-working condition, it must have been shelved some time before. Also, I do know, the gentleman was a ship pilot at a major U.S. port. So the watch spent a lot of time out in the sun, on boats, climbing and guiding ships through the port. So could that explain the differing aging of bezel, hands, dial? I don't know. But it probably explains the relatively quick aging and maybe the need for a bracelet change.
 
Posts
6,667
Likes
11,570
Omega museum has pieces that they say have never been opened (went 4 or 5 years ago), and I saw a 2915-3 at HQ Milton a few years back that they believed also had never been opened before (well until they did). Not possible to verify either case, but a couple of them had clean chrono and sub register hands to my memory. I don't have any pics, but maybe you can ask HQ milton to see if they have any in the archives.

Not sure if they have unopened 2915s or 2998s since there are none pictured in AJTT and thousands of the museum watches are pictured in that reference. Would be interested in seeing the 2915-3 from HQ Milton but not sure if they still have records or photographs of that one. Certainly none of these mint watches to my knowledge have come up for auction anywhere.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
Not sure if they have unopened 2915s or 2998s since there are none pictured in AJTT and thousands of the museum watches are pictured in that reference. Would be interested in seeing the 2915-3 from HQ Milton but not sure if they still have records or photographs of that one. Certainly none of these mint watches to my knowledge have come up for auction anywhere.

ooh I gotta get me a copy of that book. Btw I didn't say that any of these watches were mint (they weren't even close), I just meant that the chrono and sub register hands looked very clean. I apologize if I wasn't clear, but like I said, I have no way of verifying the claims. I was only trying to dissuade flyingout, maybe unnecessarily, from feeling any doubts about the watch. I'm a huge fan of the watch and would be thrilled to find one in this condition. There's is only one way to clear up any doubts: go visit Bienne! Totally worth it!
 
Posts
693
Likes
705
There's is only one way to clear up any doubts: go visit Bienne! Totally worth it!
How does that work?
 
Posts
6,667
Likes
11,570
How does that work?

You have the omega forums stamp of approval! 😉
 
Posts
693
Likes
705
That's where the museum is
Yes, I knew that. Just wondered if they provided services like an extract or more detail or is it just lots of cool stuff to see.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
Oh haha sorry. It wasn't very busy when I went, so my dad and I pretty much got a private tour. We weren't there too long, but I requested to see 2913/2914/2915/2998 and the guide talked to us about the watches. This was when I got to see the watches I refer to earlier but it was before I really got into collecting so a lot of what the guide said went over my head. I'm a very visual person, so I do recall the condition the watches were in 👍 I don't recall any extracts or additional info in the displays though. They have thousands of watches there so I barely scratched the surface; i definitely want to go back - their audio tour is supposed to be pretty comprehensive.
 
Posts
118
Likes
67
Please use your beautiful example and not just masturbate with it as others do with his collection. Thanks
 
Posts
309
Likes
360
Please use your beautiful example and not just masturbate with it as others do with his collection. Thanks

Um... what?
 
Posts
693
Likes
705
Not touching that (well, I may have just done). I'm not really a collector. I have a small collection designed to be used, with very different watches for different purposes. This new guy won't go everywhere my Sub does, but it has taken over most of the casual wear duty. The Rolex will take on the water (I dive with it), hazardous, and exercise duties. More formal wear goes to JLCs. And a Hamilton only for travel to places where the others are not wise to display. A birth-year Seamaster (little guy) doesn't get much love any more but it's not worth selling. And one or two other strays.

So yes, it will be used, probably too much.