- Posts
- 8
- Likes
- 0
Didn't you already get your answer over at WUS?
Hello! Yes, it seems to be original to me but this is a watch from the 80's or 90's so not really considered "vintage". It's from the post-quartz era and has an ETA 2892-2 movement. To me, it is less valuable and desirable than a proper vintage piece with an in-house movement (or a chronograph from Lemania).
You seem pretty needy and demanding! It is perfectly genuine example of a quite heavily worn unexceptional dress Omega from around 1990. Bizarrely it is known under the Speedmaster branding but I guess that is one of the many mistakes on the OVD since it is clearly more in the DeVille line.
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-gb/watch-omega-speedmaster-classic-heritage-da-166-0285
I like it, what do you think should I buy this watch?
Well only you can really answer that really. You haven't mentioned the price so it is difficult to judge but if it appeals to you and you can afford it, (and have considered that it may need servicing) then go for it. Would I personally buy it? Well that is rather different.
I bought $ 920.
How do you think the price? Obviously it didn't shake my budget, i liked its simplicity and elegance.