Here: http://www.ebay.com/itm/170935824255?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
So what is the consensus on the clean time and date Seamaster? Wrong hands? Wondering, as I like simple SS watches.
I don't count?? I know I've only got one But I'm on the hunt for more! However, there is something about this one that just doesn't grab me?
ask yourself this question - why replace readily available steel hands with much less common pink gold plated hands?
I used to have half a dozen. Now I have zero. Gavin and Justin got my last two - both caliber 342 models. Never fear though, When I make a comeback it's a on a bigger scale than the last tour.
Approved for posting here for your consideration: http://www.ebay.com/itm/130780976636?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649 No buying for me at the moment.
Won't go cheap but nice 14k gold cal. 321 seamaster chronograph. http://www.ebay.com/itm/121012360368Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
I was thinking the same thing, it might just be that the ~35mm case makes them look bigger, these smaller chronographs always look better with the rectangular style pushers rather than pumper pushers IMO
Maybe pushers bigger than they should. Thing about rectangular pushers they come with a snapback caseback which makes the chronograph less desirable.
Yea and the pushers themselves aren't the pinnacle of water resistance either on these rectangular ones, the design does look more elegant though
