Real/redone dial?

Posts
14
Likes
3
Hi all, I'm new to vintage manual watches and so still can't decipher what's real or not. Got this off eBay a while ago and the swill sign at the 6 o'clock position intrigued me is it missing the made word? I can't open the back to look at the movement since it is the front opening case and I don't want to mess with that, from what I read it is not easy to open. Thanks for your help. Tom
 
Posts
5,082
Likes
15,706
... the swill sign at the 6 o'clock position intrigued me is it missing the made word?
Welcome to the forum! Ah, I love auto correct sometimes. Here鈥檚 what a real swill sign should look like



Sensible answers to your question will come soon馃槈 but what is your plan, to repair and wear or to sell?
 
Posts
24,386
Likes
54,262
At first glance the dial looks strange because I am accustomed to seeing the painted minute markers extending out at least as far as the applied metal hour markers. However, perhaps there are exceptions to this.
 
Posts
14
Likes
3
I've been wanting to get a piece of real vintage Omega history and technology that I can enjoy wearing so if this one is not it I'd get rid of it and keep looking, thanks
 
Posts
24,386
Likes
54,262
I've been wanting to get a piece of real vintage Omega history and technology that I can enjoy wearing so if this one is not it I'd get rid of it and keep looking, thanks

Wait for more opinions, there are some real experts on the forum.
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
While waiting for the real experts to chime in, please let me tell you what I think:

I don't think the "SWISS only" is the major problem, but it looks like a redial and I would be worried about the signs of water damage that can be seen on (re)dial and hands.

It is correct that this is a frontloader case and you need a good watchmaker to have checked and eventually serviced the movement.

The crown is definitely not OMEGA and I've never seen before this as a replacement, which lets me think the service history is doubtable.
 
Posts
14
Likes
3
Thanks, that's what I gathered from my brief online search and so just wanted to confirm here before I endeavor on another watch search, this time I'll probably stay away from ebay 馃榾
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
Thanks, that's what I gathered from my brief online search and so just wanted to confirm here before I endeavor on another watch search, this time I'll probably stay away from ebay 馃榾

I wouldn't necessarily stay away from ebay. I would come here and ask questions before purchasing. 馃榾
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
The coronaviruses left and right from the "T"s are unconventional, don't you think?
 
Posts
14
Likes
3
The dial seems to be more textured so I assume it's original the font in the Seamaster looks correct also, the sigma signes would indicate the hour markers should contain gold, can't tell if this is the case here, the T would possible indicate tritium used in luminous hands which would also look correct in this piece.
 
Posts
14
Likes
3
the 563 movement is a quick set date I would assume is a correct one also
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
Looking at the case, what can you see or what do you miss when comparing to other watches of this reference?

s-l1600.jpg
 
Posts
14
Likes
3
of course! it's missing the seahorse, not original?
 
Posts
2,170
Likes
1,354
Better get that bezel checked as it鈥檚 not seated properly and your going to lose it

img_20200321_113752-jpg.952199

DON