lecorbusier
·Hello everyone. I am Jeff and this is my first post in this forum. This forum struck me--when compared to a few other forums centered on the watch hobby (!)--as extremely cordial and supportive. I don't own an Omega--yet--but recently and perhaps because of too much online surfing, I have been struck by the ephemeral beauty of vintage seamasters (and even speedmasters) on vintage leather straps. There is something robust, and quite beyond words, about these watches.
I did some research and came to the newly release SM300 co-axial either in SS or Ti. However, a visit to the boutique reveals that the watch in bracelet form is too clunky for my wrist and so I requested to be informed when the version with the leather strap arrives. As I am new to this brand, I hope the forum participants here can enlighten me on a few questions:
1. I am stunned by the high price of Omegas, and especially the price difference between the PO and the SM300 Co-axial. While I understand that like many high-street brands, Omega has also gone into the deep end of marketing, I still don't quite understand the high price point for a SS diver. In your opinion, what are the merits of the SM300 Co-axial and in tandem, should I source for this watch in the used market, rather than to purchase new? (I predict the price is likely to be lower after a few years).
2. Is changing the strap to bracelet, or vice versa, a simple task--for example, like the Nomos Metro where there is a mechanism to switch out/release the strap from the lug? Based on my research, it appears that this is not a task that could be handled easily even by an AD rep. On this, I have weighed the economics between a bracelet and a strap for the SM300 Co-Axial. It is debatable if a strap is a better value--but at least I don't have to hassle with switching straps; but it is highly doubtful to pay the premium for the Ti with strap especially when the Ti bracelet is the main reason for the premium.
3. In your opinion, is it likely (or more accurately, in the history of Omega) that the Co-Axial case would become slimmer in thickness in the coming years? I noticed that the watch does sit quite high on my wrist, and there are advantages in thinner watches especially when used for desk-diving! If there has been precedence in the horology of Omega to come up with thinner but not less robust movement, I think I should wait for a thinner SM300 in due course.
Thank you--this is a rather lengthy post. I look forward to visiting and participating in this forum.
I did some research and came to the newly release SM300 co-axial either in SS or Ti. However, a visit to the boutique reveals that the watch in bracelet form is too clunky for my wrist and so I requested to be informed when the version with the leather strap arrives. As I am new to this brand, I hope the forum participants here can enlighten me on a few questions:
1. I am stunned by the high price of Omegas, and especially the price difference between the PO and the SM300 Co-axial. While I understand that like many high-street brands, Omega has also gone into the deep end of marketing, I still don't quite understand the high price point for a SS diver. In your opinion, what are the merits of the SM300 Co-axial and in tandem, should I source for this watch in the used market, rather than to purchase new? (I predict the price is likely to be lower after a few years).
2. Is changing the strap to bracelet, or vice versa, a simple task--for example, like the Nomos Metro where there is a mechanism to switch out/release the strap from the lug? Based on my research, it appears that this is not a task that could be handled easily even by an AD rep. On this, I have weighed the economics between a bracelet and a strap for the SM300 Co-Axial. It is debatable if a strap is a better value--but at least I don't have to hassle with switching straps; but it is highly doubtful to pay the premium for the Ti with strap especially when the Ti bracelet is the main reason for the premium.
3. In your opinion, is it likely (or more accurately, in the history of Omega) that the Co-Axial case would become slimmer in thickness in the coming years? I noticed that the watch does sit quite high on my wrist, and there are advantages in thinner watches especially when used for desk-diving! If there has been precedence in the horology of Omega to come up with thinner but not less robust movement, I think I should wait for a thinner SM300 in due course.
Thank you--this is a rather lengthy post. I look forward to visiting and participating in this forum.