Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Perhaps, Thomas, however value based on status symbols are terribly fickle. This year's hot fashion item could be completely out of style in 5 years... like a 1974 Impala was considered good looking, giving a desirable floaty ride, and American when new, but by 1979 was considered old style, inefficient, boring to drive, domestic, and unmaneuverable. The car didn't change, but fashion did. The mechanical watch market won't disappear, but I wouldn't bet more than I was prepared to lose that today's collector's grail watches will continue to be the grail watch when I (or my heir) is ready to sell them.
What if future Apple watches and their imitators get even better, allowing full customization and programming of the screen with millions of graphic elements plus loading any animations you wanted? What if they could be smooth and tasteful, or garish and loud, depending what you were in the mood for? What if it wasn't a pain in the butt to program it? I do a little amateur astronomy; wouldn't it be nice to specify a watch with nighttime mode that was completely dark, with UTC in faint red when a button is pushed? What if it showed RA, Dec of the zenith of the sky at all times, taking your location from the built-in GPS?
I would still want mechanical watches... but I bet fewer people would be getting into them.
I actually had another thought to add to this as well. The guys who grew up around the Moon watch, and the James Bond watch and all these iconic figures who wore watches will also provide a demand for nostalgic items that remind them of their childhood. I think between all the presidents, super stars, and historical figures that wore watches that we remember and think are relevant today, also add additional value in our minds because we relate those items to people in power!
Best,
Thomas
Not necessarily. Is there a collector market for the type/style of hats worn by famous people in the 30's-70's? No, even though people that grew up during this period now have significant levels of disposable income. The reason being hats are no longer in fashion. The same may well occur with watches. It's not that the style of a watch may go out of fashion. Wristwatches in general may go the way of pocket watches.
I'm curious if there has been a market correction previously?? I would love to see a chart over the last 10-20 years. Was there a dip in 2008 during the financial crisis? I wasn't collecting then. I know markets can't continually rise, but seems to me there's going to be a lot of people buying if there is a correction 👍
The 2008 crisis if anything spurred demand for watches because it made financial products so difficult to trust, interest rates so low, and corporate returns so iffy. But if interest rates rise, people might prefer to do something else with their cash, and that is when you'll see a "market correction" for watches.
Absolutely, there has been a rise/fall of Rolex Subs (Red in particular) as well is 1655's. It's well documented in other forums.
Not necessarily. Is there a collector market for the type/style of hats worn by famous people in the 30's-70's? No, even though people that grew up during this period now have significant levels of disposable income. The reason being hats are no longer in fashion. The same may well occur with watches. It's not that the style of a watch may go out of fashion. Wristwatches in general may go the way of pocket watches.
You mentioned fashion. Great example! Yes, you are correct in saying that fashion is an every developing/changing market. Having said that, are people going to stop buying $800 belts from designer brands? No. Why? Because even if the belt changes, and the design, and how you where it, and where you acquire it, and who's wearing it....Human beings will continue to put something of value on their body to represent their status/ego through material goods. I guess my real point is that we will always have a natural desire to impress without working hard for it, and that my friend supports the luxury market.
You cannot compare fashion to watchmaking. It's not in the same playing field as far as where the value is placed in the item. There are too many variables for anyone to have the answer pegged, but my point still remains the same. Wrist watches have no reason to ride off in the sunset.
Of course you can. Very few people buy chronographs to time their laps or monitor production efficiency, and very few buy SM300's or Subs to go diving. Vintage Watches are many things to different people, but with the recent surge in interest in vintage watches, like it or not, they are clearly fashion items to a large number of people.
Exactly what happened in the vintage car market, when genuine Mopar parts evaporated from junk yards, the secondary suppliers filled in the vacuum to keep the cars on the road.

No need to apologise at all.
I do disagree though.
It's not in the same league but there is a vintage clothing market, t shirts and old Levi's that would have been thrown out years ago now sell for good money at vintage boutiques because they're currently in fashion. Once this trend passes, they'll go back to being thrown out as there won't be a large enough market to support it.
Similarly with watches, there used to be a core of wierdos who for some reason bought battered old watches rather than new ones. Presumably because they are significantly cheaper on the whole and they couldn't afford the a new Omega/Rolex. Then all of a sudden, vintage watches become very popular. There's an explosion of online vintage dealers/blogs etc, it snowballs, and now vintage exceeds the cost of new.
I just can't help but think it's a passing phase and although collectors will keep the prices of the rare and/or quality pieces elevated, once interest wanes, prices will too.